I don't think so.
What Im saying, in a nutshell, is that if you want to nail the Clinton Foundation, go for the worst, most criminal, most brazenly illegal activities it engaged in.
Wrong again. You try for that but more often than not one is forced to go after using the evidence they got or what they can get. Tiny example, see Al Capone.
I don't give a damn what or who Trump uses to obtain evidence on Clinton. And if that means using foreign governments or foreign contractors to obtain evidence, oh well.
In as few words as possible, delineate how what I’m saying differs from what you’re saying. To me, they sound like exactly the same thing.