Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New idea from anti-Trump electors: Use the electoral college to make a statement(T)
hotair.com ^ | 11/23/2016 | Allahpundit

Posted on 11/24/2016 9:22:56 AM PST by rktman

They’ve all but given up on flipping the 37 electoral votes they’d need to deny Trump 270 (not quite all, I guess, but most) yet they can still exploit the process to do some PR for changing the way the system works in the future. One thing that occurs to me: If a few more Democrats and a few less Republicans had turned out in Florida on Election Day, Hillary might have won the state while going on to lose the presidency very narrowly to Trump, 277/261. In that scenario, all you would have needed to throw the election to the House is eight red-state “faithless electors” to withhold their votes from Trump. If nine red-staters shifted their votes from Trump to Clinton, Hillary would have won the presidency outright and the country would have been paralyzed in a major national crisis. Everyone, pro-Trump or anti, should be glad that he piled up a comfortable electoral college win once he crossed 270, as the outcome easily could have been much tighter. (Remember, the winning trifecta of Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, which accounted for 46 electoral votes, was decided by a total of just 107,000 popular votes.) You would think such a miserable election would naturally end in the most contentious way possible, but we ended up being spared one last bitterly controversial act.

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: selections
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Religion and Politics
That would seem way too sensitive to gerrymandering to me. I like the statewide model much better.

I think that you are greatly over-estimating the effectiveness of gerrymandering. It's not that easy to gerrymander with the myriad to lawsuits that result if the attempt is too obvious.

21 posted on 11/24/2016 10:13:57 AM PST by CommerceComet (Hillary: A unique blend of incompetence and corruption.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource

Closest Hillary states: NH (0.4%), MN (1.5%), NV (2.4%), ME (2.7%), CO (4.9%), VA (5.3%).


22 posted on 11/24/2016 10:27:57 AM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rktman
I believe altering the Electoral College process would require a change in the Constitution. Each state would have a vote. There are more red states than blue.

It'll never happen.

23 posted on 11/24/2016 12:03:48 PM PST by HotHunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WashingtonSource

NV
hildabeast-—537,753

DJTrump———511,319

Around 26,000 union votes from vegas put her over.


24 posted on 11/24/2016 1:00:26 PM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rktman

They’re gonna get 36 states to pass an Amendment to erase the Electoral College? Many of those states’ populations would rightly understand that their states are thus disenfranchised and cease to have any influence on national government.


25 posted on 11/24/2016 2:12:14 PM PST by arthurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I agree completely.

It takes the brilliant concept of the electoral college to the next level.

All of the states are free to do this now if they so choose.


26 posted on 11/24/2016 2:37:11 PM PST by bankwalker (Does a fish know that it's wet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Hillary ain’t gonna live that long. I give her two years, tops.


27 posted on 11/24/2016 2:42:13 PM PST by abb ("News reporting is too important to be left to the journalists." Walter Abbott (1950 -))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Next time we must take Nevada.


28 posted on 11/25/2016 7:45:01 AM PST by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: jmaroneps37

If they were to go to Counties to allocate EVs, would you want to see how quickly county lines would change?? Doesn’t make any more sense than giving all states the same # of EV’s. Montana and Wyoming would have as many EVs as NY/CA?

Let’s face it, D’s get the populous counties. The 300/5000 counties HRC carried are populated by half the country. Unless we were to go to an absolute, fraud-proof popular vote, the current EV system is the best.


29 posted on 11/25/2016 7:59:47 AM PST by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rktman

That would make the Rats work harder on gerrymandering and the Rat judges come up with more and more idiotic excuses to overturn redistricting when R’s are in power.


30 posted on 11/25/2016 8:03:48 AM PST by Gil4 (And the trees are all kept equal by hatchet, ax and saw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

Hmmm. Each state gets the same amount of EC votes. Like 2 per state or 5 or 1. None of this is going to happen any time soon regardless of what the petitions signers want.


31 posted on 11/25/2016 9:33:29 AM PST by rktman (Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson