Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley
...leading many to question whether it was part of a pay-to-play scheme during the former first lady’s tenure as US Secretary of State.

Oh, please. It is SO BLATANTLY OBVIOUS. If you have to "question" if it was pay-to-play and selling of the US SOS office, you have a room temperature IQ.

13 posted on 11/23/2016 4:17:06 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ProtectOurFreedom

Why does it not surprise me that Leftist tool Julia Gillard was a mark for Clintoncrime?


14 posted on 11/23/2016 4:18:56 PM PST by Nothingburger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: ProtectOurFreedom

Well, it was pay to play.

The question here now, is whether the play that was purchased was not worth it. Whether it actually bought wickedness.

Increasingly it is obvious that yes, it bought wickedness. Australia is like, fool us once shame on you, but fool us twice shame on us!


26 posted on 11/23/2016 4:33:39 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson