Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did You See Mrs. Clinton Last Night?
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | November 17, 2016 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 11/17/2016 12:16:42 PM PST by Kaslin

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: What else do we have before have to take next break? Chuck Todd, F. Chuck Todd, NBC, was on MSNBC yesterday, and he said that it sure looks like the Democrats are trying to quietly sideline the Clintons. He pointed out that considering the Clintons dominated much of the air supply in the Democrat Party for the last 30 years, it's notable that they seemingly have evaporated in the past week, that they're nowhere.

What Chuck doesn't say here, folks, that this confirms, is the Clintons were out selling access. Hillary and Bill Clinton with their foundation were selling access, selling American policy, in exchange for big dollar donations to them, their foundation, them personally. And now that Hillary hasn't been elected, all that money's been donated for what? I mean, nothing. What are the donors gonna do now to get their money back, if they can? But what Chuck Todd means here, the Democrats are throwing the Clintons overboard, sure looks like the Democrats are trying to quietly sideline the Clintons, it means the Clintons have zero value right now.

Hillary Clinton Children's Defense Fund Gala FULL Speech 11/16/16

They have nothing to sell. The Clintons were of valuable to the Democrats as long as they had something to sell or as long as they looked like they might return to power or as long as they were at front and center of the movement of money around the globe, which is what the Clinton Global Initiative is about, being involved in the flow of money around the world, the Clintons taking whatever they can get for themselves at the same time. Hillary was a defective political product propped up by an extensive team of fixers, but they don't need her now.

And they don't need by... The way to look at this -- it's an amazing thing. The Obamas are gone -- well, the Obamas are leaving, but he's not gonna vanish. But the Clintons are gone, the Bidens are gone. Think of it! In one week, a little over a week now. Go back to the day of the election, the day before, the week before, and look what would have been the case had they won. Obama ascendant. Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton ascendant. Biden ascendant. The Democrat Party ascendant. Look at just one election, what it has exposed.

The dire straits the Democrats have actually been all these eight years, and how somewhat phony their claim to massive popularity and total devotion. It was all not true. And now, even F. Chuck Todd at NBC is lamenting the passing of the Clintons. They're no longer visible.

You just can't see 'em out there. By the way, Hillary did show up for a speech last night. You know, this is incredible. You're not supposed to mention these things, but I'm sorry.

You know, I have vastly developed powers of observation. I have a highly tuned curiosity. You combine the vast powers of observation with keen curiosity and that equals profound learning. Mrs. Clinton showed up last night at the Children's Defense Fund. People hadn't seen her since the day after the election. As I say, you're not supposed to say these things, but my friends, if you can catch the video, you just need to look at it for a minute and a half and catch a still shot.

The difference in Mrs. Clinton's appearance from, say, the last week of the campaign or even the day after the election to last night is striking. Gone was this Princess Diana haircut or whatever they were trying to make it look like. Gone was... There was no makeup. The hair was flat and just hanging there. It had not been styled. There obviously was no makeup. Obviously. I know you're not supposed to say these things. Saying these things is considered to be misogynistic and anti-women. It's not. I'm making an observation. She's a human being.

She had a vastly, dramatically different appearance. And had a still shot here. I can't show the still shot to you on the Dittocam. I couldn't get close enough for you to see it, anyway, no matter how I zoomed in, but it's striking. The eyes... It's just striking, the difference. I mean, it's so much phoniness. The Mrs. Clinton we saw last night's the real Hillary Clinton. Tired. She admitted that she's been wanting to crawl up with a book and pretend that nothing in the last six months ever happened. She told 'em this last night. She told 'em how tough it was. She didn't want to be there last night but she felt a duty to the children to show up.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Mr. Snerdley just told me that he doesn't buy this for a minute. He thinks Mrs. Clinton's appearance last night was strategic and purposeful. He said, "Everybody's blaming her, gunning for her, talking about how she blew it. So it's quite natural that she comes out and acts like the poor beat-up victim, suffering mightily, evoking sympathy from people." That's pretty much what you think, right? "Because she's plotting her future." I said, "What do you mean? She's 69 going on 80! What future?"

"She thinks she's got another ten years. This election's over, but she's plotting. These people, they're the Clintons, Rush. They never go away." I can't deny that, but... (interruption) All right. We'll put it in the mix. I have to admit the Clintons plot, that very little is real. Snerdley's theory is she wanted to look like that last night for the express purpose of, "Oh, how suffering it must be! How difficult it must be. Poor Hillary. She worked so hard and to be savaged by some brute like Trump who's now trying to find all the transgenders and move 'em to Mexico! Oh, my God, how bad could it be?"

And then there's this. The Huffing and Puffington Post. Somebody there named Sam Stein. "The Clinton Campaign Was Undone By Its Own Neglect And A Touch Of Arrogance, Staffers Say." Not Sam Stein. Sam Stein just the vessel here. Clinton "staffers." This always happens after a loss. The passage of time goes by, and then the staff starts whining and moaning and leaking so that they don't get the blame for it. Staffers -- nameless, faceless staffers -- they always end up getting the blame from debacle like this.

So these people supposedly leaking and what they're saying is that Hillary was arrogant. The campaign thought they had it in the bag, didn't even go to Wisconsin, didn't even take Trump seriously. They thought they were gonna win five or six points. You know, if I were Hillary, I might think of suing the media and their polling units. Why did they think they were so ahead? Why did anybody think Hillary was up five to six points? Why did anybody think the election was over before we voted? Why did anybody think that?

The Clintons clearly did, and so did their staff. Grounds for a lawsuit. Quote, "They had staff on the ground and lots of volunteers, but they weren’t running a massive program because they thought they were up six, seven points." Democrats... It's like I've been saying: They ran a conventional, inside-the-Beltway political blueprint campaign against an unconventional opponent that nobody knew how to program for. And then they bought hook, line, and sinker the leftist media, the leftist spin and believed it all. Not that they needed that.

I think they're arrogant enough to think they had it in the bag, anyway; that Trump couldn't possibly be supported by anybody. In fact, we kept hearing about the massive ground game that Hillary had -- the massive, coordinated, well-oiled machine the Clinton ground game was -- and this story says, "In key battleground states, calls for help weren't taken seriously..." Sounds like Benghazi. Clinton campaign offices were asking for help from the campaign. They said, "What difference it make now? We got it in the bag!"

Calls from Benghazi. "We need some help!"

"What difference does it make now?"

She left a lot of people hanging 'cause she thought it was in the bag.

END TRANSCRIPT


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: beauty; cdf; hillary; hillary2016; rush; rushtranscript
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: Kaslin

Probably knocking back the Xanax and Valium with belts of Scotch right out of the bottle. Huma probably left her too.


61 posted on 11/17/2016 3:23:09 PM PST by jmacusa (Election 2016. The Battle of Midway for The Democrat Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedomlover

She reminds me of a Rat Fish I snagged a few yours ago.


62 posted on 11/17/2016 3:28:20 PM PST by Gator113 (~DRAIN THE SWAMP~ ~ LOCK HER UP ~ ~DRAIN THE SWAMP~ ~DRAIN THE SWAMP~ ~DRAIN THE SWAMP~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FamiliarFace

She was not ‘without makeup’. She had makeup on. She was without a professional crew to hide all that crap and make her look fabulous. It just looks Ike she did her makeup herself.


63 posted on 11/17/2016 3:36:47 PM PST by sheana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: VisualizeSmallerGovernment
You seem to be ignoring the healing power of ObamaCare.

ObamaCare would do for them in less than 2 years, but they're not on it. That's for peons.

64 posted on 11/17/2016 3:43:45 PM PST by thulldud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Oatka

Hillary looks like she went back for seconds at a spirit dinner.


65 posted on 11/17/2016 4:35:41 PM PST by Towed_Jumper (I'm not homophobic --I'm homonauseated.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sheana

I agree with you. She did her own makeup, no professional doing it for her. I think I used the term “no make up” early on in the day, but upon closer examination, I saw that she was wearing mascara, eyeliner, rouge, and lipstick. I added that in later conversation, either on this thread, or another related one.

I think the real question is, why? I know she has an ulterior motive. It’s her MO. She’s trying to paint herself the victim. I’m not buying it. The American people are her victims, every minute of every day, 24/7/365.


66 posted on 11/17/2016 6:26:35 PM PST by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: FamiliarFace
She did her own makeup...I saw that she was wearing mascara, eyeliner, rouge, and lipstick

I guess now they won't allow her to have any sharp objects....like a trowel.

67 posted on 11/17/2016 6:29:59 PM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Canadians can't be our President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: ROCKLOBSTER

I actually LOLed when I read that!


68 posted on 11/17/2016 6:36:36 PM PST by FamiliarFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

IF Shrillary has ‘another 10 years’ I sincerely hope that she spends every single minute in a hard core prison.

Sure would be funny to see here breaking rocks on Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s chain gangs.


69 posted on 11/17/2016 7:51:54 PM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I will differ with Rush in that she clearly has some makeup on. I detect eyeliner and blush. However, she clearly didn’t have the team of stylists made her up for the debates. She does not look well here at all.


70 posted on 11/18/2016 2:54:17 AM PST by Pinkbell (http://dtforpres.blogspot.com/2016/11/cnn-lies-multiple-times-to-help-hillary.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Rumor has it they want to get Chelsea elected for Congress. The Clinton’s thirst for power in the next generation will drive them forward.


71 posted on 11/18/2016 2:55:42 AM PST by Pinkbell (http://dtforpres.blogspot.com/2016/11/cnn-lies-multiple-times-to-help-hillary.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart

Her left eye (right if you’re looking opposite her face at the picture) looks like she has a black eye.


72 posted on 11/18/2016 2:56:53 AM PST by Pinkbell (http://dtforpres.blogspot.com/2016/11/cnn-lies-multiple-times-to-help-hillary.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Myathenia gravis.


73 posted on 11/18/2016 3:07:09 AM PST by Mashood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
By the way, Hillary did show up for a speech last night.

I wonder what the going price for her words are THESE days!!??!!

74 posted on 11/18/2016 4:58:38 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mashood

Put away wet...


75 posted on 11/18/2016 5:03:46 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: FamiliarFace
The question is, did she go without makeup on purpose, to show how victimized she’s been? Life is always a photo op for the Clintons. They pose in the way they want you to see them.

That's a distinct possibility: "Yes, I know I look kinda beat up, but that's the price I was willing to pay by working so hard for all of you."

76 posted on 11/18/2016 5:07:44 AM PST by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

-—They’re no longer visible——

and, they are no longer viable

the question for the world is, are the Clintons more valuable to us dead , or alive?


77 posted on 11/18/2016 5:12:28 AM PST by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Does America still have lots of safe closet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

But NOT ridden hard?


78 posted on 11/18/2016 11:24:22 AM PST by Taxman ((H. L. Mencken correctly observed: Government is actually the worst failure of civilized man.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Taxman

Cheap carpet will leave impressions where the furniture used to be...


79 posted on 11/18/2016 3:36:32 PM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

LOL!


80 posted on 11/18/2016 9:16:41 PM PST by Taxman ((H. L. Mencken correctly observed: Government is actually the worst failure of civilized man.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson