Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SCOOP: Trump is discussing TED CRUZ for AG
Twitter ^ | 11/15/2016 | Jennifer Jacobs (Bloomberg)

Posted on 11/15/2016 6:29:12 PM PST by MountainWalker

SCOOP: Trump is discussing TED CRUZ for AG


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: cruz2016; debunked; fake; hoax; trumpcabinet; trumptransition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 421-434 next last
To: TEXOKIE

You don’t know if Ted Cruz loves the Constitution? Who are we supposed to look to who talks more about the Constitution than Cruz? Boehner? McConnell? Cantor? Ryan? Romney? McCain? Graham?


341 posted on 11/15/2016 10:24:15 PM PST by JediJones (Social conservatism is the root of all conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 338 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

The founders were not going to write an extremely complex text just to define what a citizen is. You do realize any law that was written to exclude any such rare and bizarre cases would need to be extremely wordy and awkward? Such laborious text would turn the Constitution into a comical document...or one about as long as Obamacare. I’m sure the founders didn’t want a child molester to become President either. But I don’t see any text in there excluding it.


342 posted on 11/15/2016 10:28:44 PM PST by JediJones (Social conservatism is the root of all conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: MountainWalker

Cruz was my choice. “flame away”

BUT we need him in congress.

And yes. Ted lost. I didn’t burn any cars. That being said. Go Trump go!!! Whoo hoo.


343 posted on 11/15/2016 10:32:06 PM PST by Organic Panic (Gentrification in America. Rich White Man Evicts Poor Black Family - MSNBCPBSCNNNYTABC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

And, remember, Obama would not have been a natural-born citizen if he was born outside the U.S. because the law at the time had residency requirements his mom didn’t meet.

The law said:

”When one parent was a U.S. citizen and the other a foreign national, the U.S. citizen parent must have resided in the U.S. for a total of 10 years prior to birth of the child with FIVE of the years after the age of 14.”

That law changed in 1986. Because the specifics of what constitutes citizenship are determined by lawmakers, not by the Constitution.


344 posted on 11/15/2016 10:32:51 PM PST by JediJones (Social conservatism is the root of all conservatism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Well from my understanding , according to my recollection from grade school civics class, it requires two citizen parents on American soil. As for only one parent, you get into dual citizenship/ loyalties.As it relates to Cruz, he has records,show them, don’t seal them. Why would anybody do that? That’s what I don’t understand, should I seal my birth records? Are your birth records sealed? Nobody finds this a little strange?


345 posted on 11/15/2016 10:37:30 PM PST by crosdaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

>>>And, remember, Obama would not have been a natural-born citizen if he was born outside the U.S. because the law at the time had residency requirements his mom didn’t meet.

Yes, I do remember. It was key to the controversy.

>>>Because the specifics of what constitutes citizenship are determined by lawmakers, not by the Constitution.

Yes. In this context we are talking about those born outside the U.S. Congress determines whether these persons are “born citizens” or require naturalization to become “naturalized citizens.” It is the law at the time of birth that applies.

thanks for your reply.


346 posted on 11/15/2016 10:40:46 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: MountainWalker

Relax folks Trump knows what he is doing, he is 20 steps ahead of everybody.

Let Cruz stay in the Senate and work to be part of the team to undo Obama and Bush.


347 posted on 11/15/2016 11:13:59 PM PST by free_life (If you ask Jesus to forgive you and to save you, He will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jpsb; D-fendr; JediJones; ROCKLOBSTER

Oh Canada!

It’s no wonder it took Ted nearly 1-1/2 years to clear up his Canadian citizenship once the Dallas Post called him out on this after they discovered they had a Canadian-Texan Senator. This was no routine revocation of citizenship. He had his records and his parent’s records sealed. It was Breitbart News that interviewed Ted’s staff when Ted became ‘unavailable’ for comment with a straight answer. And DJT has exactly what Steve Bannon and The NE knows about the Cruzs.

From an earlier comment: It doesn’t matter whether Eleanor or Rafael Cruz voted during the period that they were Canadian citizens.

They were on the rolls because the Provincial Elections Supervisor of Alberta, Canada approved their placement on the voting roll as Canadian citizens. Eleanor and Rafael’s names were printed in the Calgary newspaper and publicly posted 60 days prior to each election.

They were interviewed at their home in Calgary, declared their Canadian citizenship, presented ID, confirmed their permanent address and respective occupation / status. After this interview process, the information was verified at the Provincial Elections Office. Eleanor and Rafael Cruz were placed on the voting rolls which consisted of 100% Canadian citizens eligible to vote (over age 18.)

One who is born in Canada to Canadian citizens (a Cuban-expat and an American expat) is a 100% natural born Canadian citizen.

Ted is once.....twice.......three times a Canadian.

There are thousands of people born around the world to an American mother or father and they will never be natural born citizens. Most will never apply for U.S. citizenship. Ted holds a Canadian birth certificate and it is not amendable to a USA certification.

And Rafael Cruz’s “story” of how he came from Cuba—>Miami-—>Texas-—>New Orleans-—>Texas-—> Europe-—>Canada-—>Texas leads to lots of questions which all come back to the circle of BUSH.


348 posted on 11/15/2016 11:59:43 PM PST by Beautiful_Gracious_Skies ('45 will be the best ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

I am still amazed that after all this time and innumerable words typed, that people are STILL confused between “citizen” and “natural born citizen”.

No law passed by congress can make you a “natural born citizen”.

Your status as a “natural born citizen” was determined at the moment of your birth by your physical location and the citizenship of BOTH of your parents. (at that moment)

You must be born on United States soil, and BOTH of you parents had to be United States citizens (naturalized or native) at the moment of your birth.

If you were born in the lower 48 states by two citizen parents (naturalized or native), you are without question a “natural born citizen”.

If you were born on U.S. soil of Alaska, Hawaii, or other territories or possessions, it may depend on WHEN you were born there and the laws of those states or possessions or territories at the time of your birth.

A potential president could still have been born in Alaska or Hawaii before they became states. Different laws, at that time, might affect citizenship for individuals and parents as in the example of Obama’s mother.

Various territories and possessions have various laws in various years so that research would have to be done before a person could claim citizenship let alone natural born citizenship.

In Puerto Rico it depends what year you were born. Before or after a certain law was enacted. (don’t remember the exact details.)

On at least one island possession it depends on which half of the island you were born on.

U.S. soil is not Panama, Canada, Kenya, a ship on the ocean, a foreign embassy in a foreign country.

By the citizenship of one or both of your parents you can still be a N A T I V E born citizen (a citizen at birth), not requiring naturalization. But you could NOT be a natural born citizen eligible to the office of president or vice president.


349 posted on 11/16/2016 12:15:16 AM PST by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
I’d be happier if he were the candidate for Scalia’s seat on the Supreme Court. He’d be a very reliable conservative and a very smart one at that!!

I'm with you. SCOTUS is the place for Cruz.

350 posted on 11/16/2016 12:57:11 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eddie01

The fishing boats go out across the evening water
Smuggling arms and guns across the Spanish border
The wind whips up the waves so loud
The ghost moon sails above the clouds
And turns the rifles into silver on the border

Go and tell Lord Grenville that the tide is on the turn


351 posted on 11/16/2016 12:59:34 AM PST by Rastus (#NeverHillary #AlwaysTrump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
I have you beat, I can proudly say that I have been zotted twice, once for defending Ted Cruz against the defamations to which you have referred the second time, believe it or not, for defending Mark Levin who was being castigated for recommending the impeachment of Hillary Clinton!

If only I had known that Ted Cruz' father had personally assassinated John F. Kennedy and Mark Levin was a closet Rino.


352 posted on 11/16/2016 2:36:55 AM PST by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
Yes, I would very much like to see your links instead of merely reading your conclusionary language. I presume your link will also have the language of Dr. Carson which precipitated the whole fiasco?


353 posted on 11/16/2016 2:52:01 AM PST by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: MountainWalker

LOL! Bloomburg putting out early feelers to se what our reaction is so they can meddle....


354 posted on 11/16/2016 2:57:14 AM PST by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rastus

Al Stewart’s best song!


355 posted on 11/16/2016 2:58:02 AM PST by newfreep ("If Lyin' Ted was an American citizen, he would be a traitor.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
He was totally insufferable today.

My wife had the system in the car set to 'AM', so when I turned it on last night, Levin's rantings came spewing out. I can't believe anyone could listen to that for 30 seconds, much less three hours. Had to freshen the interior with the soundtrack from 'The Crow'...Brandon Lee>Mark Levin.

356 posted on 11/16/2016 2:58:28 AM PST by who knows what evil? (Yehovah saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Yaelle
What other "wonderful" appointments?

The Goldman Sachs appointee?

Paul Ryan's buddy in Wisconsin?


357 posted on 11/16/2016 3:03:20 AM PST by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: who knows what evil?
Levin continues to be as trenchant in his observations after the election as he was before, which was very considerable indeed.

His insights into the process of transition, the qualities needed in the individuals who will fill these posts, the tactics of Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell, the tactics of Chucky Schumer and much more are all laid out by Levin and they are informed by his vast experience.


358 posted on 11/16/2016 3:16:30 AM PST by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies]

To: MountainWalker

Maybe it’s a plan to get Cruz to be Senate majority leader?


359 posted on 11/16/2016 3:18:24 AM PST by Solson (Trump 2016!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Not SCOTUS. Too squishy. Too easily manipulated. Has history of doing the wrong thing and then making excuses for it. Last thing we need is someone as weak as John Roberts. Any blackmail fodder in his history? Probably.


360 posted on 11/16/2016 3:24:17 AM PST by MayflowerMadam (I'm starting early with a very non-PC... "MERRY CHRISTMAS!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 421-434 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson