Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Claim: 3 million votes cast by non-citizens (2016 election)
WND ^ | 11/14/2016 | WND

Posted on 11/14/2016 11:50:19 AM PST by rxsid

Claim: 3 million votes cast by non-citizens
Based on analysis of database of 180 million voter registrations
Published: 2 hours ago

Three million votes in the U.S. presidential election were cast by illegal aliens, according to Greg Phillips of the VoteFraud.org organization.

If true, this would mean that Donald Trump still won the contest despite widespread vote fraud and almost certainly won the popular vote.

“We have verified more than three million votes cast by non-citizens,” tweeted Phillips after reporting that the group had completed an analysis of a database of 180 million voter registrations"

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016election; electionfraud; foreignersvoting; fraud; illegalsvoting
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
To: Yo-Yo
"Whoa! You are assuming that all 3 million non-citizen votes went for Hillary. Maybe Trump got some of those votes, too."

No assumption here.

But lets be real, one of Trumps main campaign messages was essentially anti-illegal immigration. How many of those illegals that voted do you think would vote for the guy wanting to remove them from the gravy train? Not many.

21 posted on 11/14/2016 11:58:40 AM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rxsid


22 posted on 11/14/2016 11:58:55 AM PST by Chode (You Owe Them Nothing - Not Respect, Not Loyalty, Not Obedience, NOTHING! ich bin ein Deplorable...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
You on the left have no integrity, honesty, or common sense. High IQ doesn't make someone smart, only self deceptive.
23 posted on 11/14/2016 11:58:56 AM PST by stubernx98 (cranky, but reasonable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

I wish they would explain their analysis. That being said, the problem could be solved by rejecting votes from districts that refuse to verify citizenship. *They* are the ones that are disenfranchising others.


24 posted on 11/14/2016 11:59:13 AM PST by rightwingcrazy ("We will not tolerate those who are intolerant of the intolerant.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude
"Funny that voter I.D. wouldn’t have helped because the federal government more and more issues U.S. ID’s and demands that state issue ID’s to such people without asking questions."

Which States Offer Drivers' Licenses to Undocumented Immigrants
As of this writing in 2016, a total of 12 states plus the District of Columbia allow undocumented immigrants to obtain a driver’s license. These 12 states include California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah, Vermont and Washington.

25 posted on 11/14/2016 12:02:01 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Chode

Wow, admittedly I hadn’t heard this info. Very interesting and a great counter argument to the RATS.


26 posted on 11/14/2016 12:04:19 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez

It would be tough... I’ve actually been thinking something to propose. It would work along this line:

> Auto-registration for all US Citizens based on social security number.
> National instant-ID vetting system on election day
> When you arrive to vote, you enter your SS#. If that SS# hasn’t voted yet, you get to vote.... then the number is locked out.
> If it HAS been used already, you can vote, but both your vote and any other using the same SS# are thrown into a provisional pile.
> Provisional voters will have to present themselves to verify who was the correct voter. If you can provide positive ID on the spot, then great - you’re done.
> Bio-metrics could be employed to insure positive ID (optional: individuals would have to go to a government office to get this registered).
> No more early voting.
> On-line voting could be supported in time under this plan, which could eventually eliminate the need for absentee ballots.
> Voting results would be available nearly instantaneously.

There would be various security encryption things on both ends to insure privacy and such.

Still to work out: removal of people from rolls after death; re-use of SS#s; handling of people who move from one precinct to another.

I realize this is more invasive, and there would be screaming on both sides of the political spectrum. But it’s also the only way to get this done right.


27 posted on 11/14/2016 12:04:42 PM PST by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

OK, so I have all the facts: Who is/are the “we” (Greg Phillips @JumpVote) that verified three million illegals voted? And how did they verify it?

Because when I throw it up to libs they are going to ask for sources. What I found searching were things like Infowars, World Net daily and Tea Party.org. You know that they’re going to call any source like that right-wing lies.

And isn’t it a bit soon for all that data to have been analyzed? Could this be a trap to get us saying things that can later be proven untrue, to make us look like the RATs?


28 posted on 11/14/2016 12:07:23 PM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwingcrazy

According to the guy’s twitter account, as of 4 hours ago, they are working on a “public report” now.


29 posted on 11/14/2016 12:07:41 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
See #29
30 posted on 11/14/2016 12:09:47 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: alancarp
the list of states that don't require some kind of ID are mostly leftist states....

I am positive that there was this massive attempt to steal the election but somehow we out voted them, thank GOD....

the pubs control, so I've heard, the majority of state governorships and state houses...

why not make the election process one of high integrity....

because frankly, I see most of our elections are just frauds...

31 posted on 11/14/2016 12:11:38 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rxsid

While I do not disagree with the premise there no way to prove the allegation. Certainly no way to prove it in six days. You would have to find the bsme of every deceased voter still on the rolls. Then you would have to travk down the registration books containgbtheir names and see if someone showed up to vote in thrir olace. Possible to do? Yes, but in sux weeks or maybe months, not six days. Worth doing? Absolutely.


32 posted on 11/14/2016 12:13:46 PM PST by xkaydet65
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
Apparently, he created (or helped create) an app called VoteStand

Breitbart mentioned it in late October:
True the Vote Offers Smartphone App to Report Voter Fraud

33 posted on 11/14/2016 12:14:14 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: rightwingcrazy
that is the point....the fraud is disenfranchising all the rest of us....

just like illegals come in here and get on SSD and their kids on SSI almost immediately, and get all the free health care they want, while WE the taxpaying citizens are told to work harder, longer, and get a whooping $3 a month raise on SS....

34 posted on 11/14/2016 12:15:02 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: alancarp
I realize this is more invasive, and there would be screaming on both sides of the political spectrum. But it’s also the only way to get this done right.

Remember what Stalin is supposed to have said, that it only matters who COUNTS the votes! It's getting awfully hard to find neutral parties to do so. Online voting seems vulnerable to nearly undetectable programming fraud

35 posted on 11/14/2016 12:15:03 PM PST by JimRed (Is it 1776 yet? TERM LIMITS, now and forever! Build the Wall, NOW!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
There were 3-to-5-million illegal alien votes cast for Hillary in Clifornia ALONE. Trump won the legitimate popular vote by 2-to-4-million votes.

Period.

36 posted on 11/14/2016 12:16:28 PM PST by Gargantua ("President Trump... nice ring to it..." ;^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JimRed
"Online voting seems vulnerable to nearly undetectable programming fraud"

Agree... I didn't wanna get too long-winded in that prior post, but I have ideas for this, too:

> When you vote, you'll get a 'receipt' (or email if it happens on line) showing exactly how you voted.
> If you see something wrong, you can turn-around immediately (within 15 minutes, I'd say) and request a do-over. The receipt would be your key to get that done.
> Not sure yet how to audit the system... probably verify that the instant tallies match the sums from the generated receipts.

In short: if we can do this for national lotto drawings, we can do it for voting.

37 posted on 11/14/2016 12:22:23 PM PST by alancarp (George Orwell was an optimist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: xkaydet65
Data analysis on that order can be done in hours given proper computational analysis. In 2016, the amount of data involved with 180 million registered voters probably wouldn't even be considered "big data" by most in the biz. See big data analytics for example.

Also, see #29 & #33, looks like they may have been working on this for more than 6 days as well.

38 posted on 11/14/2016 12:23:41 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua

Agreed!


39 posted on 11/14/2016 12:24:27 PM PST by rxsid (HOW CAN A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN'S STATUS BE "GOVERNED" BY GREAT BRITAIN? - Leo Donofrio (2009))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: rxsid
Here's how Mexico handles it. Even they do a better job of it.

 photo Mexico Voting_zpsmbw44wyh.png

40 posted on 11/14/2016 12:32:38 PM PST by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Progressives spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson