Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Wins the Popular Vote -- Not
American Thinker ^ | 11/11/16 | Steven Feinstein

Posted on 11/11/2016 4:54:27 AM PST by chiller

First of all, she’s probably not going to win the actual number of votes cast. She may win the number of votes counted, but not the votes cast.

States don’t count their absentee ballots unless the number of outstanding absentee ballots is larger than the state margin of difference.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: electoralcollege; hillary; hillary2016; popuarvotetally; popularvote; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-177 next last
To: chiller
Presidential elections are determined by state, as per The Constitution. Thus, a national popular vote number is irrelevant.

By State, Trump won enough state popular votes to give him 270+ electorial votes to be declared president. By State, Clinton didn't.

Clinton, 20 states for a total of 228 Electoral votes.

Trump, 29 states for a total of 290 Electoral with MI still undecided but leaning red.

Of course, the Libs want to do away with that awkward, clumsy, archaic, maddening Electoral College and go with a national popular vote, because more Libs live in big cities and more 'deplorables' live in flyover country.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
101 posted on 11/11/2016 6:24:18 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chiller

Don’t count their write-in’s because of some stupid % thing??? Idiots. A vote is a vote.


102 posted on 11/11/2016 6:24:46 AM PST by RetiredArmy (Believe or not, we R in the Last Days of human history. Jesus is coming back, & soon! RU saved?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proudcongal

Facebook has been ablaze with petitions asking to nullify the electoral college, or for electors to take back their votes in December and elect Hillary instead, as she won the popular vote.

I am very interested to know exactly where those extra votes came from — I’m thinking a very small number of states: NY, NJ, MA, CA. SO, these idiots want to elect a President based on results from 4 lefty states? If I have time later I will see if I can come up with the answer.....


103 posted on 11/11/2016 6:28:46 AM PST by EnquiringMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PghBaldy

Actually President Bush and First Lady Laura Bush voted none of the above and concentrated instead to the congressional election to make sure we keep the House and the Senate


104 posted on 11/11/2016 6:28:52 AM PST by Kaslin (Everyone that I voted for won. Life is great!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020
Who the hell even cares?

Actually, at this point, if it can be proven that Trump actually took the popular vote, that destroys any basis for their calls for changing the election results.

Sure, they'll still try and probably still riot, but then they have nothing left to claim.

105 posted on 11/11/2016 6:28:54 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chiller

Not true. I helped count the absentee ballots in my State on Election Day.

Perhaps that is true in some States, but not in ours.

Or perhaps that used to be true.

But 50-60 percent of the ballot is ‘absentee’ in some States.


106 posted on 11/11/2016 6:32:18 AM PST by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

Give it another week.

The vote totals will go up by a huge amount over time.

Not all the votes are in yet.


107 posted on 11/11/2016 6:34:04 AM PST by Pikachu_Dad ("the media are selling you a line of soap")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: EnquiringMind

Between California and New York, Hellary got at least a four million vote margin.


108 posted on 11/11/2016 6:34:31 AM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: EnquiringMind

They did the same thing in the 2000 election. In their dreams.


109 posted on 11/11/2016 6:37:14 AM PST by Proudcongal (Almighty God, we pray for a Trump victory and for our nation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: chiller

Yep. Somebody send this to Mark Levin. He was going off on Trump losing the popular vote last night.


110 posted on 11/11/2016 6:38:56 AM PST by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crusty old prospector

A lot of dead people vote absentee.


111 posted on 11/11/2016 6:45:03 AM PST by lonestar (Texan for Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Here is what *I’ve* learned. So many people want to avoid the lines on election day that they all go to early voting, and then they have to wait on line there because there are so few polling locations for early voting. Meanwhile, on election day, waltz right up to the front-no line.


112 posted on 11/11/2016 6:45:22 AM PST by ichabod1 (Make America Normal Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: chiller

If this election and the count was truly accurate (not counting fraud) Trump’s numbers would probably be a lot more than what they are reporting.


113 posted on 11/11/2016 6:47:53 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative98; All

I have no idea if the premise is correct. This year I suspect there were very few blowout states in which it wasn’t necessary to count all the absentees....especially with all the down ballet races.

The author cited California 2000 with 2 million absentee votes , which traditionally break 2 to 1 Republican. I bet that those 667000 Bush votes were not included on election night/day after.

It should be clarified, whatever the case.


114 posted on 11/11/2016 6:51:56 AM PST by chiller (One from the Right - One for the Fight)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Proudcongal
A lady on CNN last night said hillary winning by 2 million votes. Don’t know where she got that.

She pulled that out of her ass. As with most "reporting" these bozos do.

115 posted on 11/11/2016 6:52:05 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Cletus.D.Yokel; metmom

This thread described how to check your voter status across all states:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/bloggers/3480980/posts?page=14


116 posted on 11/11/2016 6:53:14 AM PST by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticides, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Oldexpat; chiller

>> Doesn’t that effect down ballot races? <<

The absentees will be counted in any local jurisdiction (city, district, county, state) where they could theoretically make a difference. It’s inconceivable that the courts would allow otherwise.

For example, if a race for sheriff is tied at 50-50 in County X among the votes cast on election day, and if there is even one absentee ballot, then that ballot will necessarily be counted.

But if the race comes out as 75-25 among the election-day voters, then that one absentee ballot need not be counted — unless there is a specific statute to require universal counting of absentee ballots (possible, but rare).

In the meantime, for the state at issue, the absentee ballots in other counties might or might not be counted — depending on whether those ballots could change a local election.


117 posted on 11/11/2016 7:01:55 AM PST by Hawthorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: chiller

How many of Clinton’s votes were cast by illegals, the dead, multiple voters, fabricated characters, mental incompetents with “help”???


118 posted on 11/11/2016 7:02:21 AM PST by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37
The media AND ALL LIBTARDS will never admit it even if it were proven black and white.




119 posted on 11/11/2016 7:03:19 AM PST by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

The vote counts at CNN ARE going up and being updated. So here are the current numbers (Nov 11 10AM) from
www.cnn.com/election/results/

The pop vote difference is about 400K right now:

Clinton: 60,467,245 - 47.7%
Trump: 60,071,650 - 47.4%

The bar chart shows them even because a .3 difference is insignificant in 120 million votes.


120 posted on 11/11/2016 7:04:35 AM PST by plushaye ("I will raise up Trump to be a Trumpet, says the Lord." - Prophet Kim Clement (2007))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-177 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson