Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

Now, I am darned optimistic, and I don’t think it is unreasonable to expect a landslide. But the “election day voters” numbers don’t make that leap.

________________________

Really! Rassmussen released a poll 2 days ago where he stated that 88% of voters who had not voted yet have decided whom they will vote for. Of that 88% 53% will vote for Trump and 43 % will vote for Clinton. Looks like a landslide to me.


41 posted on 11/06/2016 11:26:45 AM PST by GilGil (E. Deplorabus Unum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: GilGil
My point was that the two CBS polls mentioned as evidence for a landslide (which is not the Rasmussen generality either) don't suggest a landslide. The suggest Crooked wins the early voted, Trump wins the election day votes, and the combined votes result in a tie.

Now, I'm not saying that is what is going to happen. I am only remarking as to the evidence used. "Trump projected to win the election day votes by such and so (big) margins" is not sufficient basis to assert "Trump wins Ohio and Florida in a landslide," or that the dam is breaking.

Election day turnout is the key, and that is in the future.

62 posted on 11/06/2016 11:40:41 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson