Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Herridge: Abedin Told FBI She Notified WH Every Time Clinton Changed Emails
Fox News ^ | Nov. 2, 2016 | Catherine Herridge

Posted on 11/06/2016 5:35:37 AM PST by george76

resident Obama ... used a private email alias to converse with Clinton at times, as well as corresponded with her on his specially-secured BlackBerry phone.

Abedin told FBI agents she "had to tell the White House" every time Hillary Clinton changed her email address to make sure his device would accept it.

Obama's presidential cell phone only accepts calls and messages from "whitelisted" sources, Herridge reported last week.

The development may be "another admission that the White House understood [Clinton] was using this private server for government business, and that the president was OK with it... because they were allowing updates to the email [address] to be made," Herridge said.

(Excerpt) Read more at insider.foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: abedin; clinton; emails; fbi; herridge; hillaryemailaddress; obama
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 11/06/2016 5:35:37 AM PST by george76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: george76

What did he know and when did he know it?


2 posted on 11/06/2016 5:38:26 AM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76
Comey is very disappointed that came out. I'm thinking he had no issues going after Hillary but discovery would lead to the Kenyan, that was a bridge to far.
3 posted on 11/06/2016 5:41:13 AM PST by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I knew this months ago, this is why their lies are so obviously ridiculous, they think everyone is stupid.


4 posted on 11/06/2016 5:49:08 AM PST by dila813 (Voting for Trump to Punish Trumpets!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

With all that is out there how can we expect anything from the GOP who hasnt done anything since 2012. If the beast fraudulently wins the election all that is out there stays out there. Many in congress have been blackmailed or are involved in it don’t expect anything from them.


5 posted on 11/06/2016 5:50:40 AM PST by ronnie raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DAC21

You are probably right about that. It was probably his main fear, although I do think he was reluctant to go after Hillary for two other reasons: (1) he didn’t want it to look like he was interfering with the election process and (2) any investigation could open a can of worms that would likely spread to others and could get quite messy.


6 posted on 11/06/2016 5:51:54 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: george76
If Herridge reports it, its accurate.

Now, will anything become of it?

7 posted on 11/06/2016 5:52:13 AM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

Congress isn’t going to do anything, except put on some more political theater to make it appear as though they are doing something.

The reality is that Congress does not represent us. It is a club that only looks out for itself.


8 posted on 11/06/2016 5:53:38 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: george76

.... and nothing was done.

No laws are ever applied to the Clintons and their gang.

NO RULE OF LAW.


9 posted on 11/06/2016 6:00:49 AM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

I think this explains Hillary’s oddly vague excuse that her private server was “allowed.” That choice of words always struck me as curious. That Obama knew makes a lot of details fit better into place.


10 posted on 11/06/2016 6:01:40 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

No. Not for the Clintons.

But what will come of it is people will no longer respect the law since it is either not enforced or not enforced for certain elite people.

The result is NO RULE OF LAW.

That is what will become of all this.
I say burn it down and start over again ... and this next time everyone equal before the law or get rid of the law.


11 posted on 11/06/2016 6:02:59 AM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

“If Herridge reports it, its accurate.”................

Is that the same as saying, “I read it on the internet so it MUST be true”?


12 posted on 11/06/2016 6:07:23 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: george76

Huma didn’t get immunity months ago, it’s said her lawyers were negotiating that all last week, so maybe she does now or soon will. But those deals are void if she lies.

Plus she’s probably motivated to be truthful by the specter of Tony Weiner raising her son. And the color orange.


13 posted on 11/06/2016 6:08:17 AM PST by bigbob (The Hillary indictment will have to come from us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

She and Sharyl Atkisson are about the only known reliable reporters out there.


14 posted on 11/06/2016 6:09:36 AM PST by TiGuy22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: george76

Who is leaking?

How do we know this is true?

Huma is a spy and can’t be trusted.


15 posted on 11/06/2016 6:10:52 AM PST by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37
Is that the same as saying, “I read it on the internet so it MUST be true”?

Actually, it's exactly the opposite of what you're suggesting. Catherine Herridge is one of the few honest, truly investigative, reporters left.

So the answer to your question is "no".

16 posted on 11/06/2016 6:12:04 AM PST by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Huma has not been raised to be honest.

Taqqiya.

You will never get anything from her. And other people have been raising her child all along.


17 posted on 11/06/2016 6:12:37 AM PST by browniexyz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

I hate to day it...but if she wins, based on all we know...could this evil woman be the ‘beast’ or the ‘whore?’

Ever hear of unintentional prophetic language? Recently I have heard of it and people are watching the perceptions of the public.

Names and acronyms have meanings beyond the obvious at times. There is a reason we get rankled when 0bama insists on ISIL instead of ISIS. It has do with our inner prophetic language. Earlier this week I pondered if all this stuff we’re learning is preparing us for the ‘man of predation’ to be fully revealed?


18 posted on 11/06/2016 6:18:58 AM PST by EBH (As for me and my house, we will serve the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

And no follow up question - who allowed the server


19 posted on 11/06/2016 6:28:44 AM PST by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nailbiter

I don’t think anyone did, at least officially. But the fact Obama knew and did nothing amounts to tacit approval, and Hillary knows it. The old line “IIf I’m going down I’m taking you with me” comes to mind.


20 posted on 11/06/2016 6:32:17 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson