Posted on 11/04/2016 2:38:26 PM PDT by TigerClaws
Welcome to the latest edition of What Was Fake on the Internet this Election, a frequently recurring column where we round up the fake and misleading stories on the Internet about the 2016 presidential campaign. Instead of the usual list of a handful of hoaxes, we are devoting this entire edition to a conspiracy theory claiming that John Podesta is a Satanist. Buckle up.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3489318/posts?q=1&;page=61#61
Here’s what I expect a valued Freeper to do:
1. Point out the source of this thread. WAPO. State that it’s not surprising WAPO would defend any minion of Hillary on any topic.
2. Trace the source of the Satan, Podesta, Child Molestation rings, etc. Find the Sources. It they are new like say for example ‘truepundit.com’, then caution other Freepers to take it slow before running with it.
The hard-core left is hoping someone like Hannity, Drudge or Rush etc. will give it airtime so they can turn the tables with a gotcha. Then it dominates the news cycle and Hillary gets a boost.
You’ll notice Hannity, Rush, Drudge et. are not yet runing with this, at least not to my knowledge.
It may be true that Podesta is involved in these horrors but it’s smart to wait to be sure. That’s the point.
People, even Freepers, even me at times, can fall for a sensationalistic piece because it is written to shock. Then readers follow it like a herd. If it was true, and it gets checked out thoroughly, the seasoned media personas like Hannity, Drudge, Rush will run with it. If it is not true, it makes fools of everyone that followed it and believed it.
The point is “Don’t be a sucker. Wait until the smoke clears.”
Phew! She has the same fashion designer as Darth Vadar. Go away, Hillary!
It’s Marina Abramovic, but I can’t find the things people are talking about. I think it’s just another “shiny thing” to distract.
“Its an Clinton machine trick. Be careful not to fall for it.”
That gaslighting trick of theirs does occur at times. Since this stuff was taken from emails they believed were destroyed, it’s more likely that these creepy even are real.
Evidently John Podesta’s brother Tony and his wife collect art photos by Hellen Van Meene. Go look at them. They are very creepy. Young women and girls scantily dressed and looking either dead or almost dead.
Were they taken from emails?
I have read over more than a hundred emails and brought some to FR in the past week and received kudos for it. But my eyes are blurry with the magnitude of the email content.
If the Satan/Podesta stuff is from emails and it is clear, then I agree with you.
It's not about the sex - it's about the transfer of power, of life force, and creating channels and conduits for demonic entities to get in. It's black magic, in other words. It enables possession, and it feeds the demons. That's why secret societies are secret. Demons need bodies and minds to act through. Jesus confirmed demons are real by casting them out. Nothing has changed except that science has convinced everyone that demons don't exist. But there is a science of demonology and black magic, and to be an elite you have to make yourself available to it - and it's evil. It's core principle is rape trauma, of whatever kind.
The site that she has that was up on FR yesterday was really WEIRD!!
and I would believe in a second that they are satan worshipers.
But the one good thing to come out of all this is the black clergy has heard about it and arn’t at all happy.
Otherwise, you’re right, shiny object.
She said the satanic recipe with blood, urine, and semen wasnt really satanic, that it was just performance art.
There is now way to pass this off as normal. It’s not art. It’s not avant-garde. It’s sick.
Notice they HAD to address it, finally.
Not exactly.
This is from a wikileaks email... Which has proven to be accurate in a number of things like Donna Brazille leaking debate questions to Podesta.
Drudge had it up front page today and it was the top trend on Twitter after 600k shares.
Lots of other stuff to talk about... But this ain’t nothing.
Oh yeah, like we are going to believe the Washington Post. How would they know anyhow? They haven’t done investigative journalism since the 70s.
Blood, feces, semen and urine. Just another day in San FranSicko.
So now they’re saying that all the leaked emails are fake. Or they’re saying that spirit cooking means adding wine to recipes?
Yeah, sure.
so if it wasnt podesta was it Hillary?
Performance art. Sure. And if I rub my feces in Tim Kaine’s face, and use the ‘performance art’ defense, WaPo will be defending me to the hilt. Sure.
Yes; I’m about 95% sure these were from Wikileaks emails. I’d like to say 100% sure, but there’s been so much chaos on so many levels with these people that it’s hard to keep my brain organized.
So you’re saying that the wikileaks huge stash of Podesta emails are fake?
Hee hee! Good one!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.