Posted on 11/03/2016 1:16:07 PM PDT by Sleeping Freeper
Strikes me as a big problem that the NYT is having...
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Philippe Reines wrote: There's a lot to respond to here, but first and foremost the premise is wrong. There is nothing wrong with anyone having personal email addresses or her emailing someone's private account or vice versa. Maybe she was wishing Jake a happy birthday. Or I was sending her a note about her mom. Or she asking Monica about Oscar disappearing. We're allowed to have personal lives.
Second, it was her practice, as well as ours, to conduct work on the .gov system. In those cases we didn't, which could have been for any reason, including State.gov being down. In those cases the onus is on us to make sure that anything that should have ended up in the right place did.
Now, depending on what they are looking at, you can't easily determine if that happened. They are looking at HER email, not ours. They don't know what next step we took.
The most important thing to ascertain from State is whether they are looking at specific email from the "300" - because in those cases Heather and I went one by one to determine if a) it needed to end up on .gov, and b) it did indeed end up there.
Since there are less than a dozen instances of this in the 300 it was easy. One is me sending her a clip, no commentary. Another is her emailing me & Huma about something that I subsequently followed up on my .gov account. We did that for each and could share that if need be.
If they've somehow seen some of the other 55k...
(Excerpt) Read more at wikileaks.org ...
> wrote:
+ Robby and John
Strikes me as a big problem that the NYT is having selected emails leaked to them and I I think we should do a call to discuss the proper way to handle.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Philippe Reines > wrote: There's a lot to respond to here, but first and foremost the premise is wrong. There is nothing wrong with anyone having personal email addresses or her emailing someone's private account or vice versa. Maybe she was wishing Jake a happy birthday. Or I was sending her a note about her mom. Or she asking Monica about Oscar disappearing. We're allowed to have personal lives.
Second, it was her practice, as well as ours, to conduct work on the .gov system. In those cases we didn't, which could have been for any reason, including State.gov being down. In those cases the onus is on us to make sure that anything that should have ended up in the right place did.
Now, depending on what they are looking at, you can't easily determine if that happened. They are looking at HER email, not ours. They don't know what next step we took.
The most important thing to ascertain from State is whether they are looking at specific email from the "300" - because in those cases Heather and I went one by one to determine if a) it needed to end up on .gov, and b) it did indeed end up there.
Since there are less than a dozen instances of this in the 300 it was easy. One is me sending her a clip, no commentary. Another is her emailing me & Huma about something that I subsequently followed up on my .gov account. We did that for each and could share that if need be.
If they've somehow seen some of the other 55k, we'd need to see each to determine what they were.
Lastly, we should warn Monica. Huma, unless you want to Nick or I can.
From: Nick Merrill Sent: Tuesday, March 17, 2015 3:13 PM To: Jennifer Palmieri; Cheryl Mills; Philippe Reines; Heather Samuelson; Huma Abedin; Jacob Sullivan Subject: NYT | Email Content
Here is the story that I mentioned hearing from State about over the weekend. Specific questions are below.
Jen when we talked over the weekend you noted that it was fairly irresponsible for them to cherry pick leaked emails and write it up as representative. And some of the questions below are a little ridiculous to say the least.
I’ll call State now and see what they know and report back. I also asked what their deadline was.
Nick
Who or what is the 300?
NEW YES!!!!!
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-03/wikileaks-releases-doj-fbi-huma-special-podesta-emails
I am pretty sure the FBI is not happy to learn there are 55k withheld emails that the state dept staff has screened out.. and not yoga class schedules
Notice this conversation is on March 17th. Two weeks after the notice. Clearly trying to COVER-UP/HIDE info.
My question also. What is the 300?
They keep using the word email. Religiously.
The primary problem is conducting State business on a PRIVATE SERVER.
Secondary problems may (or may not be) the contents of emails and other documents routed through the PRIVATE SERVER while she was Secretary of State.
We know Hillary did NOT use a government system. So who in the whole bunch did?
Just emphasizing that the conversation is March 17, 2015 not March 2016.
Thanks for the clarification!
And on Mar 23, 2015 Hillary went to the White house and had a secret unscheduled afternoon meeting with Obama that Josh Earnest refused to even acknowledge was happening. The press was not informed.
MARCH 23, 2015 : (SECRET MEETING AT THE WHITE HOUSE) Obama Hosts Secret Meeting At The White House With Hillary Clinton, Breitbart Big Government, ^ | 3/23/15 | Charlie Spiering
Here is my take on it, they copied the contents on EMAIL SERVER to Weiner’s laptop then cleaned out everything on the server with Bleachbit. Which means that EVERYTHING is on that laptop.
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/794273710559657987
“My question also. What is the 300?”
It is the 300 Spartans at Battle of Thermopylae, against the Persian Emperor Xerxes and his Immortals! LOL.
Yup....I posted that yesterday.
“My question also. What is the 300?”
It is the 300 Spartans at Battle of Thermopylae, against the Persian Emperor Xerxes and his Immortals! LOL.
I think those numbers pertain to a person....or some kind of extension to that person. So there has to be a log someplace.
There must be a treasure trove of incriminating info on that laptop, and if the witch gets elected, then what?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.