It was an IIRC....what would you expect when some doofus comes back with “Traficant?”
I then gave you the full link to the specific Constitutional reference and you. I also mentioned the exceptions. And you decided to keep on being obtuse and contrarian and started parsing, etc.
I gave you the information - more than you ever gave me in your original reply to something I said to someone else.
You can kibutz all you want, but you can take a leap for all I care. It isn’t worth arguing with someone not equipped for it.
There you go again.
I did not post to you until you posted to me. (post 37)
They way you make things up... and then start with the ad hominem remarks.