Posted on 10/31/2016 10:56:24 AM PDT by MarchonDC09122009
Fraction Magic Video - (Massive Vote Fraud BlackBoxVoting.org)
http://blackboxvoting.org/
Must see: Fraction Magic Video
By Bev Harris
A real-time demo of the most devastating election theft mechanism yet found, with context and explanation. Demonstration uses a real voting system and real vote databases and takes place in seconds across multiple jurisdictions. Over 5000 subcontractors and middlemen have the access to perform this for any or all clients. It can give contract signing authority to whoever the…
Read More October 31, 2016
Bev Harris has been investigating this issue doggedly for years.
Her investigative film proves the tabulation code used across numerous electronic voting machine platforms lacks integrity review and oversight.
Fractional tabulation permits rounding up or down results to benefit a candidate's election.
Physical, access control, and software application security lapses galore.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=Fob-AGgZn44
10/31/2016
Fraction Magic Video
A real-time demo of the most devastating election theft mechanism yet found, with context and explanation. Demonstration uses a real voting system and real vote databases and takes place in seconds across multiple jurisdictions.
Over 5000 subcontractors and middlemen have the access to perform this for any or all clients. It can give contract signing authority to whoever the user chooses. All political power can be converted to the hands of a few anonymous subcontractors.
“It’s a product. It’s scaleable. It learns its environment and can adjust to any political environment, any demographic. It runs silently, invisibly, and can produce plausible results that really pass for the real thing.”
Provides solutions and actions for immediate deterrence.
IDs, paper ballots, purple thumbs.
Good enough for the third world, good enough for a banana republic.
http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-1/
Fraction Magic – Part 1: Votes are being counted as fractions instead of as whole numbers
fraction-magic-1
Summary –
This report summarizes the results of our review of the GEMS election management system, which counts approximately 25 percent of all votes in the United States. The results of this study demonstrate that a fractional vote feature is embedded in each GEMS application which can be used to invisibly, yet radically, alter election outcomes by pre-setting desired vote percentages to redistribute votes. This tampering is not visible to election observers, even if they are standing in the room and watching the computer. Use of the decimalized vote feature is unlikely to be detected by auditing or canvass procedures, and can be applied across large jurisdictions in less than 60 seconds.
gems-usaGEMS vote-counting systems are and have been operated under five trade names: Global Election Systems, Diebold Election Systems, Premier Election Systems, Dominion Voting Systems, and Election Systems & Software, in addition to a number of private regional subcontractors. At the time of this writing, this system is used statewide in Alaska, Connecticut, Georgia, Mississippi, New Hampshire, Utah and Vermont, and for counties in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming. It is also used in Canada.
Fractionalized vote:
Instead of “1” the vote is allowed to be 1/2, or 1+7/8, or any other value that is not a whole number.
What fractionalized votes can do:
They allow “weighting” of races. Weighting a race removes the principle of “one person-one vote” to allow some votes to be counted as less than one or more than one. Regardless of what the real votes are, candidates can receive a set percentage of votes. Results can be controlled. For example, Candidate A can be assigned 44% of the votes, Candidate B 51%, and Candidate C the rest.
GEMS fractionalizes votes in three places:
The “Summary” vote tally, which provides overall election totals for each race on Election Night
The “Statement of Votes Cast”, which provides detailed results by precinct and voting method (ie. Polling, absentee, early, provisional)
The “undervote” count
Fractions in results reports are not visible.Votes containing decimals are reported as whole numbers unless specifically instructed to reveal decimals (which is not the default setting). All evidence that fractional values ever existed can be removed instantly even from the underlying database using a setting in the GEMS data tables, in which case even instructing GEMS to show the decimals will fail to reveal they were used.
Source code: Instructions to treat votes as decimal values instead of whole numbers are inserted multiple times in the GEMS source code itself; thus, this feature cannot have been created by accident.
Fractionalizing the votes which create the Summary Results allows alteration of Election Night Web results and results sent to the Secretary of State, as well as results available at and local election officials.
Fractionalizing the “Statement of Votes Cast” allows an extraordinary amount of precision, enabling alteration of results by specific voting machine, absentee batch, or precinct. Vote results can be altered for polling places in predominantly Black neighborhoods, and can parse out precincts within a mixed batch of early or absentee votes.
Fractionalizing the undervote category allows reallocation of valid votes into undervotes.
Voting rights abomination
According to programmer notes, a weighted race feature was designed which not only gives some votes more weight than others, but does so based on the voter’s identity. Ballots are connected to voters, weights are assigned to each voter per race, stored in an external table not visible in GEMS. Our testing shows that one vote can be counted 25 times, another only one one-thousandth of a time, effectively converting some votes to zero.
The study was prompted by two issues: (1) Anomalies in elections in Shelby County, Tennessee, which uses the GEMS election management system, in which inconsistencies were observed in reporting of results by GEMS; and (2) Concerns raised regarding the presence of middlemen during the election process, such that a single individual gains remote access to the election management program, in some cases in multiple jurisdictions.
The questions we examine are these:
Can election outcomes be controlled with enough versatility to allow a national impact? Does any mechanism exist that would enable a political consultant or technician to capture elections for repeat customers?
If the necessary features exist within the election management system to facilitate this:
Were such features embedded accidentally or on purpose; for what stated purpose were such features installed; if a reason was given, is that reason justifiable?
How might risks associated with inside access be mitigated?
Next:
Part 2: Context, Background, Deeper, Worse http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-2
All:
Part 1: Votes are being counted as fractions instead of as whole numbers http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-1
Part 2: Context, Background, Deeper, Worse http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-2
Part 3: Proof of code http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-3
Part 4: Presidential race in an entire state switched in four seconds http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-4
Part 5: Masters of the Universe http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-5
Part 6: Execution capacity – coming – http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-6
Part 7: Solutions and Mitigations – coming – http://blackboxvoting.org/fraction-magic-7
* * * * *
bev-harrisBev Harris is a writer and founder of Black Box Voting. She has researched and written about election transparency and computerized voting systems since 2002. Harris was featured in the Emmy-nominated HBO documentary Hacking Democracy, and is the author of Black Box Voting: Ballot Tampering in the 21st Century, a book purchased by the White House Library and also reportedly found on Osama bin Laden’s bookshelf. Harris’s research has been covered in The New York Times, Vanity Fair, Time Magazine, CNN and several international publications, including the Philippine Daily Inquirer and Agence France Presse. Media inquiries: Contact by text (for immediate response) or by phone 206-335-7747.
bennie-smithBennie Smith is a Memphis-based application developer for an electrical manufacturing company. He is also a political strategist who has developed a micro-targeting application that predicts voter turnout. In August 2014 he was approached by a number of candidates who insisted that their elections had been stolen. He disagreed with the group and offered to look into how the system works. After discovering a number of irregularities, Smith began to research how votes that originate from the same source can change once they get into the GEMS vote tabulation program. Smith’s attention to these anomalies uncovered an extraordinarily high-risk tampering mechanism and ultimately provided a new infrastructure for analyzing questionable election results.
Bev Harris is full of crap. This is the same woman who after the 2004 election had people on her website sending in donations so she could continue the effort to prove that John Kerry actually won the election. She is nothing but a fraud who preys on the stupid.
The well is hereby poisoned.
If Hillary wins, there will be Hell to pay, literally.
bump for later
Bookmarking
Hi Billy boy
You are certainly entitled to your opinions.
Let us know when you are able to contribute constructive evidence to disprove doubts that Digital voting machine tabulation integrity is completely sound and secure.
Bev Harris source cited
https://www.cs.princeton.edu/courses/archive/fall04/frs125/schedule.html
https://www.amazon.com/Black-Box-Voting-Tampering-Century/dp/192946245X
“Riveting...scoops that would have made her [Bev Harris’s] career at the New York Times or Washington Post.”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacking_Democracy
Perhaps you should watch the video before casting judgement...
If this is legit, keep up the good work.
If not, bye bye.
BTTT
The guy in there NOW only got there the SAME way Hillary is trying to get ‘selected’ NOW.
Once Trump gets into office, he ought to take down every single law, edict, regulation, etc. that the illegitimate a^% hat “O” put in place. THOSE were not legitimate administrations.
Sure seems it.
Numerous University Computer Science Engineering departments have investigated security and integrity of Digital Recording Election voting machines and have concluded there are Severe security flaws in software and firmware code.
University of Connecticut Electrical Engineering dept investigations:
https://voter.engr.uconn.edu/voter/reports/
States have reviewed the vulnerabilities and decertified multiple vendor voting systems:
https://web.archive.org/web/20070817120818/http://www.sos.ca.gov/elections/elections_vsr.htm
Top-To-Bottom Review
Secretary of State Debra Bowen began her top-to-bottom review of the voting machines certified for use in California in March 2007. The review was designed to restore the public’s confidence in the integrity of the electoral process and to ensure that California voters are being asked to cast their ballots on machines that are secure, accurate, reliable, and accessible. On August 3, 2007, Secretary Bowen announced her decisions regarding which systems in the review will be permitted to be used in the 2008 elections and beyond. The following documents detail Secretary Bowen’s decisions.
Decertification/Recertification Decisions Issued August 3, 2007, by Secretary of State Debra Bowen
Diebold Election Systems, Inc.
Withdrawal of Approval/Conditional Reapproval (.pdf, 6,734KB)
Hart InterCivic
Withdrawal of Approval/Conditional Reapproval for Hart System 6.2.1 (.pdf, 5,886KB)
Voluntary Withdrawal of Certification of Hart System 6.1 (.pdf, 303KB)
Sequoia Voting Systems
Withdrawal of Approval/Conditional Reapproval (.pdf, 4,631KB)
Elections Systems and Software, Inc.
Rescission and Withdrawal of Approval (.pdf, 303KB)
UC Final Reports
The University of California has submitted its reports on the findings from the top-to-bottom review. The red team and source code team reports are separated by voting system. The accessibility report contains findings on all of the voting systems that were reviewed. The document review teams submitted their reports on schedule. Their reports will be posted as soon as the Secretary of State ensures the reports do not inadvertently disclose security-sensitive information.
UC Source Code Team Reports:
Principal Investigator’s Statement on Protection of Security-Sensitive Information (.pdf, 13.9KB)
Diebold Elections Systems, Inc. (.pdf, 561KB)
Hart InterCivic (.pdf, 573KB)
Sequoia Voting Systems (.pdf, 831KB)
UC Red Team Reports:
Overview by UC Principal Investigator Matt Bishop (.pdf, 303KB)
Diebold Elections Systems, Inc. (.pdf, 498KB)
Hart InterCivic (.pdf, 376KB)
Sequoia Voting Systems (.pdf, 108KB)
The video evidence was Very convincing.
As are the numerous universities and states that have investigated this issue and DECERTIFIED NUMEROUS vendors Digital Recording Election voting machines.
Anbsolutely:
“Perhaps you should watch the video before casting judgement...”
All Freepers Must Watch And Share (email, Social Media, blogs, etc)
For the record this is red linked on Drudge dead center right now.
A Democrat Bev Harris has put together a video that explains how election machines will shave Trump votes.
A guy in Tennessee found the “MASTER KEY” to changing votes. They were able to flip the entire State of Alaska in 4 seconds.
Soros owned machines plan to steal Texas, Utah, Georgia and Mississippi for Hillary. Trump is winning big time, but the Globalists/Establishment can’t have this.
They will still it from remote Servers that Soros machines report to.
Immediately after the 2004 election Beth Harris on her website was furiously collecting contributions from those who were hell-bent on believing that George Bush and the Republicans stole the 2004 election. You can go back and research it if you’d like I read it I was on the site every single day and I saw with my own eyes what was going on.
She is a FRAUD!!
Keep in mind I am not suggesting that there is no possibility of fraud in the upcoming election. What I am saying is that this person Bev Harris is looking to make money off the controversy.
See post #18
I read your post; you really should watch the video. Did you? Of course you did not...Had you watched the video, you would see it is not her research, it is another gentleman who discovered the problem and worked with her to expand his research.
But instead of harping about something from TWELVE YEARS AGO, you should look into something that is front and center on Drudge TODAY.
Don’t get me going on the Bush family. Frankly, given the way the entire Bush family has acted in this election, I don’t know what they did or did not do in 2004, and at this point, I don’t care. Sad to say, Bush election gave us Obama**... Clearly, many if not all of them are supporting Hillary, and they are part of the Uniparty...the status quo—Bush and Kerry are both globalists cut from same cloth..it has just taken a while to figure out that we are practicing the Hegelian Dialectic...not actual choices...
**The one blessing is that Obama will hopefully give us Trump. But we need to be up on vote fraud to prevent it.
Watch the video!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.