Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Retired CIA Officer Explains Why "Hillary's Emails Matter" [must read]
zero hedge ^ | 31OCT16 | Authored by Charles Faddis (a former CIA operations officer with 20 years of experience in intellige

Posted on 10/30/2016 4:36:03 PM PDT by vannrox

Retired CIA Officer Explains Why "Hillary's Emails Matter"

Tyler Durden's picture

Authored by Charles Faddis (a former CIA operations officer with 20 years of experience in intelligence operations), originally posted at TheHill.com,

The 2016 presidential election, already one of the wildest in American history, has been rocked by the announcement that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is reopening its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server while Secretary of State.

Apparently while investigating disgraced ex-Congressman Anthony Weiner’s transmission of sexually explicit images to a fifteen-year-old girl, the FBI discovered more emails relevant to Hillary Clinton’s own infamous case.

At the time, Weiner was married to Huma Abedin, Clinton’s personal aide, perhaps best known for her alleged family ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. The emails appear to have been found on a computer used by both Abedin and Weiner.

Where all this goes from here remains unclear. That said, in the interest of helping a scandal-weary electorate put these new developments in context, shall we review a few things?

I have worked in national security my entire life. Most of that has been in the intelligence community surrounded by classified information. For twenty years, I worked undercover in the Central Intelligence Agency, recruiting sources, producing intelligence and running operations. I have a pretty concrete understanding of how classified information is handled and how government communications systems work.

 

Nobody uses a private email server for official business. Period. Full stop.

 

The entire notion is, to borrow a phrase from a Clinton campaign official, “insane.” That anyone would presume to be allowed to do so is mind-boggling. That government officials allowed Hillary Clinton to do so is nauseating.

 

Classified and unclassified information do not mix. They don’t travel in the same streams through the same pipes. They move in clearly well defined channels so that never the twain shall meet. Mixing them together is unheard of and a major criminal offense.

 

If you end up with classified information in an unclassified channel, you have done something very wrong and very serious.

 

Accidentally removing a single classified message from controlled spaces, without any evidence of intent or exposure to hostile forces, can get you fired and cost you your clearance. Repeated instances will land you in prison.

 

Every hostile intelligence agency on the planet targets senior American officials for collection. The Secretary of State tops the list. Almost anything the Secretary of State had to say about her official duties, her schedule, her mood, her plans for the weekend, would be prized information to adversaries.

 

It is very difficult, in fact, to think of much of anything that the Secretary of State could be saying in email that we would want hostile forces to know.

As we wait for more information on the latest revelations, let’s quickly note what we already know Hillary Clinton did.

While Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton exclusively used a private email address for official business. Instead of using a State Department account, she used a personal email account, housed on a private server located in her home in Chappaqua, New York. The Department of State exercised zero control or oversight in this process. No government security personnel were involved in protecting them.

 

When the House Select Committee on Benghazi asked to see these emails, the Department of State said they did not have them. Clinton’s lawyers then went through all the emails on her server. They turned over 30,000 emails they decided were work related and deleted all of the rest.

 

How they made the decision as to which emails to share and which to destroy remains unknown. Active government officials not were involved in this process.

 

Hillary says she did not use the account to transmit classified information. This has been proven false. The FBI found over 100 messages that contained information that was classified when sent, including numerous email chains at the level of Top Secret/Special Access Programs. They don’t get any more highly classified, it’s the virtual summit of Mt. Everest. One theme pertained to the movement of North Korean nuclear assets obtained via satellite imagery. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out this is extremely sensitive information.

 

The FBI found another 2,000 messages containing information that should have been classified at the time it was sent. How much more classified information may have been in the tens of thousands of emails, which Clinton’s lawyers erased, is completely unknown.

Hillary Clinton supporters like to ask rhetorically, “Well, what about Colin Powell?” Nice try, but using your own private email address which received 2 emails determined to be classified later, is nothing like deliberately operating a home brewed server, and then see it handle thousands of classified e-mails.

It’s like asking, "what about the guy who received a stolen apple?" while equating his actions to those of bank robbers who stole $10 million.

What happens next we do not know. What we do know already is this. While serving in one of the most senior positions in the United States Government, Hillary Clinton was at a minimum, grossly negligent in the handling of classified information and when confronted with this practice, acted immediately to destroy information and prevent a full, fair and complete investigation of any damage to national security.

Anyone else who did such things in the government would long ago have been tried, convicted and sent to jail. 

You decide if you want to send her to the White House instead.



TOPICS: Breaking News; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2tieredlaw; abovethelaw; classifiedinfo; clinton; clintonsarespecial; comeyrico; crime; criminalactions; election; elections; email; grossnegligence; hillary; incompetence; lynchrico; nationalsecurity; nomorelaw; privateserver; rules4theexempt; securitybreach; specialpeople; trumpwasright
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: Churchillspirit

I would have to hear that myself to believe it. Doug Schoen? Going outside to shoot some low flying pigs!


21 posted on 10/30/2016 5:01:09 PM PDT by mazda77 (The solution: Vote Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ilovesarah2012

No, the FBI did not revoke, jut sent a letter to the State Department to issue a revoke order. State is responsible for passports.


22 posted on 10/30/2016 5:04:19 PM PDT by mazda77 (The solution: Vote Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: vannrox; All

Not to make light of current events, just a few short years ago many of us here were watching and critiquing a TV show called 24. In later episodes there was quite a bit of skul drudgery, treason,traitorous and down right nasty scenarios coming straight out of the white house and the capitol. Of course much of that was dismissed as nothing more but fanfare and fantasy for the TV audience and general entertainment. The producers of that show knew more of the real day to day operations that go on in DC as we are witnessing much of the same right now.


23 posted on 10/30/2016 5:05:20 PM PDT by eastforker (The only time you can be satisfied is when your all Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

That was really something. Just in time for Halloween. Thanks for the link. Probably total BS but entertaining nonetheless.


24 posted on 10/30/2016 5:05:42 PM PDT by be-baw (still seeking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

turns out Hillary is not a rat after all...she’s a mole...


25 posted on 10/30/2016 5:06:42 PM PDT by maxsand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

I’m disregarding the second one since I had already read the first one. :=)


26 posted on 10/30/2016 5:07:59 PM PDT by Bob (No, being a US Senator and the Secretary of State are not accomplishments; they're jobs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Amazing stuff from Anonymous.


27 posted on 10/30/2016 5:14:05 PM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CincyRichieRich

Well they got Al Capone for tax evasion. Sadly all doesn’t often get reconciled with these evil, slimy murderers, criminals—snakes with many heads. If it does that would be fantastic and true justice served. But for now just getting this criminal in charge of a decades long standing criminal empire is a beginning.


28 posted on 10/30/2016 5:15:54 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bob

haha. just mean. lol. But funny. ;D.


29 posted on 10/30/2016 5:17:12 PM PDT by GOP Poet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

“Apparently while investigating disgraced ex-Congressman Anthony Weiner’s transmission of sexually explicit images to a fifteen-year-old girl, the FBI discovered more emails relevant to Hillary Clinton’s own infamous case.”

More as in 650,000 emails, according to The Drudge Report!


30 posted on 10/30/2016 5:24:36 PM PDT by Guardian Sebastian (Proud to be deplorable.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

My THOUGHTS
The NYPDD special victims unit, or the same sort of unit in North Carolina, discover Wiener was sending nude photos of children accross the interwebs.
They discover Weiner used the Clinton server to distribute said child pron.
Worse, either Bill, Hillary, or both, also traded child pron across the interwebs vis the Clinton server.
Finally, their customers were the highest mover and shakers across the globe.

That would get Comeys attention and require a letter to Congress


31 posted on 10/30/2016 5:28:30 PM PDT by Steven Tyler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Interesting take. ????

Well, it is certainly more than just one of several possible interpretations of Clinton’s felonious actions. It is an accurate, irrefutable description of the reality of the situation.

More disturbing is that the State Department along with the DOJ and for the moment the FBI were professionally and criminally negligent and placed at great risk the very people they serve. (It is notable that each of those departments is under the management of the Oval Office.)

Together with Clinton’s actions that negligence has endangered the security of each man, woman and child in our nation; That threat will continue until responsible professionals are able to identify and correct the damage.

32 posted on 10/30/2016 5:28:32 PM PDT by frog in a pot (When is the time to question whether a "religion" with a totalitarian agenda is a 1stA religion?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

Well, that’s interesting.

Curiously, Chelsea’s neighbor, (one of 3?) J Lo, headlined for H last night.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3886430/Jennifer-Lopez-Marc-Anthony-perform-time-Hillary-Clinton.html


33 posted on 10/30/2016 5:31:14 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RummyChick

My bet is she is already on “vacation” in Saudi Arabia.


34 posted on 10/30/2016 5:38:21 PM PDT by VRWCarea51 (The Original 1998 Version)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ClaudiusI

Custom order it from Vista Print


35 posted on 10/30/2016 5:38:24 PM PDT by kevslisababy (I am a Genuine Female: No after market parts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jazminerose

The dems in my circle wouldn’t know who Faddis is; and have paid no attention to anything but dem talking points regarding Clinton’s scandals.

The next week is going to be very strange, for them. I’m trying to remember Kubler-Ross’s ‘stages of grief’...


36 posted on 10/30/2016 5:47:50 PM PDT by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, If you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
"While serving in one of the most senior positions in the United States Government, Hillary Clinton was at a minimum, grossly negligent in the handling of classified information and when confronted with this practice, acted immediately to destroy all evidence against her. information and prevent a full, fair and complete investigation of any damage to national security."

Fixed it. Seems to me no "journalist" in todays World wants to state HRC destroys evidence of her criminal doings.

37 posted on 10/30/2016 5:50:30 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (America IS sick, and tired of the Clintons. It's time to shut them down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

PFL


38 posted on 10/30/2016 5:51:31 PM PDT by Batman11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

Yup! producers put out shows to prep the public to become numb to political, and social things they may ordinarily not agree with. isn’t it the same in advertising too? If you see some thing a few times you become more open to trying it.


39 posted on 10/30/2016 5:52:27 PM PDT by b4me (Idolatry is rampant in thoughts and actions. Choose whom you will serve....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
What really kills me is the reckless disregard of the rules and treating it all like it's funny. When asked if she wiped her hard-drive, she asked pissily, "Like with a Kleenex?"

If Hillary is this flippant with classified info, how much do you think she gives a crap about other types of info? Do you think she gives a crap about compromising her employees' social security numbers? What about contract competition-sensitive and For Official Use Only? Any GS-11 would be fired and brought up on charges for handling that stuff the way Hillary did, and I'm not even talking classified here!

For anybody that has had a security clearance, if you're not outraged about this, you don't have a pulse. The real reason that this is on the FBI's front-burner again: career agents are running for the exits because they can't bring themselves to work for a bureau that looks the other way on this kind of crap. I'm sure Comey has heard through unofficial channels that he better not spit on the sidewalk and had better not be in the same area code of any organization reunions. When the rank-and-file is pissed with you, they have ways of letting you know.

40 posted on 10/30/2016 6:12:24 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson