Ruh roh
I’m not “less likely” to vote for Clinton...I was at a 0.000% chance before the revelation....
jsut covering their butt from their ridiculously biased polls...now they have an excuse for being so far off
James O’Keefe of Project Veritas has promised to release a video early this week showing “them” demeaning and disparaging black people. Its going to be an interesting week, that’s for sure.
BOOM!
Its over - its actually already over because D +7, D +8 is nowhere in sight in early voting.
Remember, that’s why pollsters assume Hillary has a slight lead or the race is tied.
In reality, she’s well behind, especially if electorate is R +4.
Uh-Oh Spaghetti-Os!
Maybe they should just stay home in protest. They should make their voices heard with their refusal to support corruption. Or write-in Bernie. Or whatever.
I actually don’t believe this. I believe the 34% were people already voting for Trump.
The devil is in the details. Hillary supporters or waffling independents are not going to dump Hillary because of some vague lapse of email protocol. The actual emails themselves have to be damning for this to be damaging to her.
So, how exactly can you be ahead a few points, lose 30% in a 3 day average, which should be 10%, and only lose 2% in the final tally?
This is despite the Clinton Crime Machine full court press to suppress social media.
Dang, I guess the WP and the NYT will now predict she’s only five point ahead. /s
Grain of salt time.
It looks like depressing us with the “Trump has 0% chance of winning!” and “Hillary is ahead everywhere by double digits!” stories didn’t work.
I wouldn’t put it past them, now, to give us “Trump is going to win!” and “Trump is ahead everywhere!” stories in order to siphon away some of our motivation to vote.
So, don’t trust anything the democrats say. Don’t trust this latest “bombshell.” Don’t trust the stories about upcoming bombshells. Don’t trust the FBI, don’t trust a word from anyone in the government and absolutely don’t trust the media.
She’s done.
46% are still going to vote for her? Even with 34% saying they are less likely to vote for her? Romney was right. Crooked Hillary, insane Kaine, and hack Huma will get at least 47% NO MATTER WHAT.
Not only is this great news, Tedlim, but it also will fuel President Trump’s electoral reform, limiting all non-absentee (which will revert to requiring valid excuse) voting to Election Day.
This all puts Ryan-Kasich-NationalReview-Cruz-etal in a huge conundrum, and especially Ryan. If this election ends up as close as it appears, then I cannot imagine how Ryan can remain in charge after the election — however it turns out.
Ryan has been feckless end-to-end. He has endorsed but not really endorsed Trump. He has been silent on Trump’s policy positions even when he has every opportunity to come out to support them. It is worth providing specific examples:
1. “Whereas the senior legislative leadership stands opposed in principle to minimum wage legislation, we could support our nominee’s proposed hike to $10/hour if it were integrated into bipartisan as a compromise that enables lower tax rates, overall tax reform, restraints on spending, and other grand initiatives to get this country back on track. I believe that this is precisely what a President Trump would propose, and we endorse that approach, even if it includes the higher minimum wage.”
2. “While we would not single out NAFTA as the best example, we understand the frustration that our base has with the international trade treaties that the US has negotiated in the past quarter-century. The Obama Administration routinely declines to enforce the plain language of these agreements. It negotiates agreements that he refuses to put before the Senate for ratification. This includes not only the reprehensible Iran deal, but also climate change treaties that obligate the US for decades to come and that will cost our economy trillions of dollars. This administration actively encourages the UN and other international agencies to ignore or override our treaties. The list goes on, and for this reason we regret that our nominee has focused so narrowly on NAFTA. But we agree that our treaties, NAFTA included, would benefit from very close scrutiny by a President Trump, with a long list of elements that must be revisited and modified.”
In other words, a Speaker Ryan could put some distance between himself and the Republican Nominee without being the total jerk wad he has been to date.
The fact that he has not done this, not adjusted his positions one whit as the sewage around Clinton and the Dems build, not relented even a tad as victory has come into clear view; ... truly, if he cannot make even a last-minute effort to close the gap with Trump, then I think he cannot be the speaker once the election ends. If Trump wins, I don’t think he can keep Ryan. I don’t see that he has a choice. And if Trump loses narrowly, the defeat will surely derive from Ryan’s choices not to show any flexibility whatsoever. We will have HRC in the White House reminding us daily, often hourly, of what a knucklehead we have running the House.
Since Trump announced he was going to run I have always said he will take 47 states. I stand behind this.