Posted on 10/27/2016 1:27:08 PM PDT by Kaslin
BEGIN TRANSCRIPT
RUSH: The WikiLeaks dump today has something incredible in it and one of the things I like to try to do each and every day is take the complex and make it understandable. Sometimes it's challenging to do because in order to take something complex and make it understandable, the people to whom you're speaking have to have at least a quasi-foundation of understanding of the subject matter. And I think in this case most every one of you do.
The specific leak to which I'm referring is a series of emails that show the absolute connection between the Clinton Global Initiative and the Clinton Foundation and Bill and Hillary Clinton getting personally rich from their foundations. The email dump today is largely focused on a man named Doug Band, who is a former Clinton advisor. He might still be an adviser, I don't know.
He had a company called Teneo. And he was once in legal trouble for commingling, if you will, going back and forth between his company and the Clinton foundations and sharing donors and siphoning donations off for personal usage.
And at one point he got so frustrated (imitating Band), "Hey, if you're coming after me, why aren't you going after Bill Clinton? He did the same thing." And he called the operation Bill Clinton Inc. It's a term that I used all the way back in 2008, and Obama used it in 2008 when he was campaigning against Hillary. And what Bill Clinton Inc. means, Incorporated, Bill Clinton, Inc., what it means is that the Clintons found a way to get personally rich on the creation of their foundation and some of the satellites, one of them being the Clinton Global Initiative.
The email dump from WikiLeaks today documents it in ways that if you don't have a foundational understanding, it's gonna sound like it's in the weeds. I have to tell you, in thinking about whether to do this and dig into it, it's a real question I have because the objective here is to keep you listening. But if this is not done right, if I get off too deep in the weeds, it's not gonna make any sense to you and you're gonna lose interest in it because you won't be able to keep up and it will be my fault.
So I'm still thinking how I want to share this data with you. It prints out to six pages and I'm not gonna sit here and read six pages. I mean, by the time I get to page two you would have forgotten what I told you on page one, so I've gotta find a way. But don't worry. This is my job, man. It is what I do, is make the complex understandable. And I'm gonna find a way to do it because it confirms what everybody suspected all along.
In fact, there's even an email within the Clinton campaign, the Hillary campaign, they're emailing back and forth about the challenges their campaign faces, and it's a woman -- I forget her name -- it doesn't matter who it is. Six questions she is asking her members of the campaign team, and question number six in her memo/email: "What's the difference in Bill Clinton, what he did, and Bill Cosby?"
That's something they thought they were going to have to deal with as all of these women came forward, and all of the news about Clinton abusing women and philandering around, cheating on Hillary. They thought -- this is some months ago -- that they might have to deal with somebody asking, "Hey, how's he any different than Bill Cosby?"
So they were ramping up and preparing to answer those kinds of questions. But, of course, the questions never came because the Drive-By Media is in bed with these people. They're having strategy-session dinners at Podesta's house. I think 35 members of the media named in this document dump. Now, about this document dump, folks, I've been seriously asking myself: Where does this come from? Who did hack into these servers? Now, the Democrat Party wants us to believe that it's the Russians.
And the Democrat Party from the White House on down is blaming the Russians, and Obama is leading that charge blaming the Russians, and other ranking Obama administration officials are blaming it on the Russians. What if the Russians have nothing to do with this? Do you realize how risky and dangerous it is if the Russians have nothing to do with this, for our president and his administration trying to tell the world that they did it? What if they didn't? And they're just... They're casually playing around with it.
They're angering and provoking a potential nuclear enemy here for their own selfish little political purposes. But what if Julian Assange didn't get any of this from the Russians? Well, then where did it come from? It had to come... Somebody who did this hack, whoever did it -- because there aren't any hacks of Republican servers. RNC, Trump, you name it. There isn't an equivalent or corresponding hack of the Republicans. So whoever is doing this has a grudge against somebody, the Democrats at large or Hillary or Bill.
Maybe it's Podesta. It's his email account, his Gmail account that's been hacked here, and as a result everybody that emailed with him has been "Hoovered," if you will, sucked up in this act. So who could have done it? Who out there has a revenge motive against the Democrats? Who have the Democrats mistreated, maligned, impugned, in such a way who have the skills and the talents to be able to effect this, 'cause this is an incredible hack, folks. This... The voluminous... The latest news from whoever it is... You know what?
The latest news from whoever it is, the hacker claims he has -- she, whoever -- the 33,000 emails Hillary deleted. The hacker claims to have them. Well, I'll guarantee you the hacker's reading these things, and I've noticed a pattern, folks. Look, I'm just openly speculating with you here. I have noticed a pattern. Whenever the Democrats release something along the lines of an October Surprise about Trump, it isn't long before there's another dump of hacked emails from Podesta. It's almost like whoever's doing this is following along our campaign.
And whenever the Democrats unload on Trump, the hacker releases another trove of anti-Democrat stuff, as though and as if the hacker is attempting to limit the damage to Trump by taking the focus off of whatever the Democrats are ladling out about Trump and with dumping another trove of Podesta emails. Now, that's just something I have sensed. I've not done a sit-down study and actually charted it. It just seems that way to me. I could be all wet about this. But my point here is, I think this is not the Russians. This is more personal.
There's something about this. I mean, do you realize how deep this hack is, and it's only of Democrats? And in a normal... Let me tell you something, folks. In a normal campaign season, this stuff gets Hillary Clinton out of the race. Everything that has been uncovered here, the Clintons are gone. Everything that's been uncovered here, the Democrats would not want to even stick their necks out to try to support.
But because Trump is the nominee and because the elites just think Trump is the absolute worst thing to ever come down the pike, everybody remains united around the Clintons, but this is... This makes Richard Nixon and what he even thought about doing look like a kindergarten Halloween party. This is major, major stuff that's being revealed here that these people have engaged in! Just the financial aspects of this alone, the finagling, the commingling of money, the selling of influence to Mrs. Clinton is secretary of state.
Foreign countries, foreign donors, the mechanisms by which that are detailed by which Bill Clinton... One of the ways it works is that they'll go out, they'll seek a donation -- the Clinton Foundation -- say from Coca-Cola or from the Rockefeller Foundation, Rockefeller Trust or whatever. I mean, they're hitting on everybody, the Clintons are, and their aides, their employees at the foundation. And one of the things that often is included is say, "In addition to your donation, we would like you to hire Bill Clinton as a consultant for $3.9 million a year to advise you on strategic whatever."
They hit up various corporations, and the corporations have done it according to these emails. Corporations are paying Bill Clinton three and a half, $3.9 million a year to "consult," after also donating to the foundation. What do they think they're getting for this? I mean, do they really like Bill Clinton so much that they want to give him $3.9 million after donating another number of millions to his foundation? For what? This is way beyond the appearance of impropriety. It's just being covered up and masked by the Drive-By Media who think it's a bigger story that somebody took a blowtorch to Trump's star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame.
I mean, this stuff in these leaks is devastating. And then the more we learn about the email scandal and the cronyism that went on between Obama and the FBI and granting Hillary's assistants status as "lawyers" after granting them immunity -- Cheryl Mills I'm talking about -- and then agreeing to destroy her laptop after supposedly procuring all the evidence they needed from it? I mean, they're willfully destroying evidence here. They're immunizing the potentially guilty and getting nothing for it.
I mean, the scandals here go beyond the average, ordinary American's ability to absorb it all. They are so dramatic, they're so constant and so frequent. But since none of it has really been reported. There isn't any foundation of understanding on the part of the mass population for it. To them, it's just the same old, tired allegations these mean Republicans make about the Clintons and so forth. But, I mean, it's devastating what's being learned.
And this information is coming to us from Democrat sources. It's from their emails. It's from their communications back and forth on how this foundation, the Clinton Global Initiative, the Hillary campaign, how it's all run and operates, how it shakes people down. So it all adds up to nobody knows, and I want to get back to that. We'll take a break here and get back to nobody knows and the shift in polls that represents this overnight change of fortune in the way it's being reported. It's amazing.
END TRANSCRIPT
Ok Rush lost me there. He started talking about Clinton, Inc., and ended up talking about Wikileaks.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/10/26/bill-clinton-inc-email-details-how-top-aides-helped-make-ex-president-rich.html ....... Bill Clinton is the Criminal in Chief and Obama and Hillary are vp criminal surrogates.........
Nooo, his whole discourse is wondering from where these leaks are coming and from whom. He's working on figuring it out, if he can.
That's not how I read the title "How Clinton, Inc. Raked in Cash."
Appearing on her show, Charles Ortel told Fox's Judge Jeannine that the Clinton Foundation books report intake of some 2 billion dollars.....but via Ortel's own prodigious, impeccable research, Ortel asserts the Clinton Foundation raised a staggering 100 billion dollars.
ANOTHER CINTON CRIME: falsifying official documents.
=======================================
Much of that money is secretly stashed all over the globe, and is wire-
transferred to fuel Hillary's campaign, as needed. She needs fund-raisers
like she needs a hole in the head.
Even more egregious, the Clintons used confidential/classified/top secret
State Dept info (belonging to US taxpayers) to structure the buck-raking deals.
=====================================
KEEP IN MIND--In addition to the highly visible Clinton Global Initiative, there are several separate Clinton foundations that maintain their own revenue streams. All these entities maintain separate operations for the Clintons’ pay-to-play global racketeering operations:
<><>the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI),
<><>the Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton (BHCC) Foundation,
<><>the Clinton Foundation Hong Kong,
<><> William J. Clinton Foundation Charitable Trust (Kenya),
<><>William J. Clinton Foundation Charitable Trust (UK),
<><> the Clinton Foundation Insalingsstiftelse (Sweden).
<><> the Clinton/Guistra Partnership, Canada.
EMPHASIS should be placed here: the Clintons raised money for a specific project, and got people to contribute for that particular project ....... soliciting by snailmail or email.
Podesta's recent email drop asserts contributions were diverted elsewhere. Monies donated to "help the poor" diverted to finance Bill's globe-trotting, high-end staff salaries, glitzy events, admin costs, is considered mail/electronic fraud.
I just send you a freep mail
"according to some calculations, the Uranium One deal, involving top Clinton donors Frank Guistra and Ian Telfer, has transferred as much as 50 percent of projected American uranium production to Kremlin control."
***********************************************
RUSSIAGATE
Who paid Bill Clinton's $2.5 million commission and $500k speaking fee for brokering the sale of 20% of America's uranium deposits to Russia?
You are speaking about a really interesting deal that ended up giving Vladimir Putin and the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.
Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. ..."
Judge Napolitano thinks that it’s the “good guys” in the NSA that has done the hacking of the emails and NOT the Russians. That sounds plausible to me. There has GOT to be some patriots still existing in those agencies.
Probably is the Russians, in an attempt for that source (WLs) to establish credibility and win Americans' trust, with largely factual dirt on the Clinton Crime Syndicate. Then, after they securely have that trust, they'd begin to put out pro-Russia disinformation. Because this is precisely how the Russians operate. They are masters of the arts of disinformation and deception. They're excellent chess players, thinking many moves ahead of their opponents. Meanwhile, most of us, so-to-speak, can barely grasp simple checkers.
There is more of an explanation in the full body transcript here... http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2016/10/27/an_explanation_of_how_clinton_inc_raked_in_cash_through_cronyism
Thanks, that was a lot more informative.
Placemark
Circa 2010--Ex-Pres Clinton in Moscow having a laugh w/ Putin
as strategic US uranium deposits were sold off to Russia for Big Bucks
facilitated by Secy Clinton, as Bill globe-trotted to set up the deal.
"Hahahaha. US ntl security? Hahahaha. Jut sho me the money, Vlad."
The report “From Russia With Money — Hillary Clinton, the Russian Reset and Cronyism” raises serious questions about the cash connections between the Clintons and participants in Hillary’s the State Department-era’s failed five-year effort to improve, or “reset,” US-Russia relations.
A Moscow-based Silicon Valley-styled developer of biomed, space, nuclear and IT technologies called “Skolkovo” — allegedly poured tens of millions of dollars into the Clinton Foundation.
Hillary Clinton was at the center of these efforts author Peter Schweizer argues. “Of the 28 US, European and Russian companies that participated in Skolkovo, 17 of them were Clinton Foundation donors” or sponsored speeches by former President Bill Clinton, Schweizer told The NY Post.
<><> Hillary presented the “reset button” to Rusia in 2009.
<><> Circa 2010—Ex-Pres Clinton is in Moscow having a laugh w/ Putin. Bill also got a 500,000 speaking fee in Moscow.
<><> A Jan 2014 document shows that Hillary’s campaign chair, John Podesta, transferred more than 25,000 of 75,000 shares in a Russian company to Leonidio Holdings LLC, an address listed as his daughter Megan Rouse’s Shannon Court home in Dublin. Rouse operates Megan Rouse Financial Planning from that same address.
(NOTE Podesta is Bill’s onetime COS, onetime Obama Counsellor, former Clinton Foundation employee, Hillary’s current campaign chair.)
Uranium One Company chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations, as well.
============================================
The NYT report noted that these uranium investors also donated to the Clinton Foundation, as follows:
<><> Canadian mining mogul, Frank Giustra, globe-trotting pal of Bill donated $31.3 million and a pledge for $100 million more to the Clinton Foundation. Giustra built a company that later merged with Uranium One. Seems to have facilitated the uranium sell-off. Giustra has a "Clinton-connected foundation" in Canada and will not disclose donors.
<><> Canadian Ian Telfer—donated $2.35 million to the Clinton Foundation. Mining investor who was chairman of Uranium One when an arm of the Russian government, Rosatom, acquired it.
<><>Paul Reynolds—donated $1 million to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation Adviser on 2007 UrAsia-Uranium One merger. Later Reynolds helped raise $260 million for the company. Could be the money-laundering apprat.
<><>Frank Holmes-—donated $250,000 to $500,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Chief Executive of U.S. Global Investors Inc., which held $4.7 million in Uranium One shares in the first quarter of 2011.
<><> Canadian Neil Woodyer-—Founded Endeavour Mining with Giustra—donated $50,000 to $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation. Adviser to Uranium One.
<><> GMP Securities Ltd.-—Donating portion of profits to the Clinton Foundation. Worked on debt issue that raised $260 million for Uranium One. (Prime candidate for the money-laundering apparat---aided and abetted under cover of the "do-good foundations.")
Just ran across this. Thought you might find it interesting....
Re: Turkish Prime Minister Mr. Ahmet Davutoglu’s meeting request with H.E. Ms. Hillary Clinton
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/33360
==========================================
Talk about kissing-up----herein is Hillary's entire reason for running.
She can't last a day unless she's being glorified by these characters.
From: İsmail Çobanoğlu
To: "john.podesta@gmail.com
Dear Mr. Podesta,
I am writing to you on behalf of the Embassy of Turkey to request your > kind assistance in scheduling a meeting between Ms. Hillary Clinton and > Turkish Prime Minister, Mr. Ahmet Davutoglu.
We tried to communicate the > meeting request through US State Department, but since she’s no longer the > Secretary, State Department was not able to provide any help to us on this.
Prime Minister Davutoglu will be in New York from 26 to 30 September to attend the United Nations General Assembly and he is hoping to pay a > courtesy call on Ms. Clinton during one of those days in New York.
This > meeting request comes from Mr. Davutoglu in light of his prior friendship > with Secretary Clinton dating back to the time when they were colleagues as > Secretary of State/Foreign Minister.
We would much appreciate your kind assistance in scheduling such a meeting > in New York during the above-mentioned time frame.
Thank you very much in advance and kind regards,
Ismail Cobanoglu
There’s a lot weird going on in that email.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
