Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Putin Blasts Clinton & Tells US To Stop Criticising Russia Or 'There Will Be Consequences'
Daily Express ^ | October 25, 2016 | By Zoe Efstathiou

Posted on 10/25/2016 4:54:29 AM PDT by Strategy

IN A SHOCKING video, Vladimir Putin has warned the US to stop stoking tensions with Russia or "there will be consequences".

The Russian president delivered the ominous threat as tensions between the West and Russia hit all-time highs over Russian airstrikes in Syria.

In the clip, which was filmed at a Russian press conference, Mr. Putin claimed the US is focusing on Russia and Iran "to distract voters from the country's problems" by creating "an enemy and uniting the nation against them".

He said: "Jeopardising Russian-American relations in order to gain brownie points internally - I consider this to be harmful and counter productive.

"It's not funny anymore. If somebody out there wants confrontation... This is not our choice but this means that there will be problems."

The worrying video has already racked up 1.3 million views as fears escalate over a third world war.

Mr Putin weighed in on the US presidential race and criticised Hillary Clinton's "very aggressive" stance towards Russia.

He said: "Mrs. Clinton has chosen to take up a very aggressive stance against our country, against Russia.

(Excerpt) Read more at express.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: coldwar2; draftourdaughters; fightforher; hillary; kgbputin; mikepence; obama; putin; russia; russiagate; smokeandmirrors; sovietunion2; uranium; wagthedog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 10/25/2016 4:54:29 AM PDT by Strategy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Strategy

And she calls Trump the dangerous one - Putin has her and Obama pegged.


2 posted on 10/25/2016 4:56:49 AM PDT by trebb (Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy
I saw the entire video....Putin is pi****.

Hillary will be totally ignored if she EVER tries to confront him in any way. (And not as President).She blew it.

Remember the big deal with the reset button...Dem cr** from Day 1.

3 posted on 10/25/2016 4:57:53 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

This Putin press conference has been on youtube for some time. He didn’t blast Hillary. He only said that she is blaming Russia to distract voters from her problems.


4 posted on 10/25/2016 4:59:12 AM PDT by Helicondelta (Deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

The scape goat throws off the alleged sin

The whipping boy grabs the whip and turns it around

Never before has an innocent foreign nation been so unjustly charged with intervening in a federal election

Who do you believe........ Hillary et al or Putin?

Hillary lies all the time about everything


5 posted on 10/25/2016 5:02:13 AM PDT by bert ((K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Hilary is an Ameriphobe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta
But immediately after citing Clinton's Russia diversion/blame he said this:

"It's not funny anymore. If somebody out there wants confrontation... This is not our choice but this means that there will be problems."

If that isn't a blast and a promise, I don't know what is.

6 posted on 10/25/2016 5:02:45 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

As I’ve said before, the Democrats trying to claim Russia is tampering with out election are playing with fire. This is a very bad idea, and so far I’ve seen no evidence at all it’s actually true.

I’ve seen democrats not just suggesting it, but claiming it as if it were proven fact. Bad idea. I think Hillary did that at the last debate if I remember correctly.

If...or when...this all hits the fan it will get really ugly, these people need to stop before it backfires...


7 posted on 10/25/2016 5:12:50 AM PDT by Paleo Pete (Proud to be a redneck deplorable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Hey Hillary, go ahead and call Mr. Trump a bully again. Tell everyone how mean he is to you as you set back relations with Russia and you aren’t even in office. Let’s see how you handle this MAN putting you in your place. Looks like your fat a$$ed, pompous, arrogant mouth wrote a check you can’t cash.

Its about time someone shut you up.


8 posted on 10/25/2016 5:13:12 AM PDT by Cowgirl of Justice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

Vlad said, ‘brownie points’? HA! I thought that lame expression was only used Stateside.


9 posted on 10/25/2016 5:16:59 AM PDT by heterosupremacist (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

B’witch is gonna need a new reset button.


10 posted on 10/25/2016 5:19:01 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (A rigged debate is a rigged election. More was made of the "Twenty-One" gameshow scandal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cowgirl of Justice

Frankly, our only big deterrent to Russia is the arsenal of nuclear options we have (or had). We don’t have the manpower or sustained supply inventory to carry any protracted conventional opposition to them. And the only ‘threat’ Hillary as President would have is a nuclear response.....that very same response she and every other effing Democrat who have been working tirelessly to diminish that supply to nothing.

I’ll tell you what would happen if an armed confrontation happened. We’d get a bloody nose and no doubt their side too. But they’d withstand it and she’d find out our nuclear deterrent is of no use to her. What she’d do in that case is capitulate as long as they make her the new Commisar of Amerika.


11 posted on 10/25/2016 5:20:10 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

Bottom line is, Hillary wants a nuclear war with Russia to hide her own sins and get the US to focus on rebuilding the US after the first exchanges of nuclear weapons and 100 million dead Americans. Yes, I said it, she would kill 100 million Americans just to create the perfect diversion to hide her own sins.


12 posted on 10/25/2016 5:24:55 AM PDT by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Remember the big deal with the reset button...

With the entire resources of the US government at her disposal as Secretary Of State Hillary couldn't even manage to get an accurate translation
of one word from English to Ruussian.

And then she didn't demonstrate enough common sense to have the translation verified before she embarrassed the USA by presenting her gimmicky
Red Reset Button with an incorrect translation to Russia in front of the entire world.

But she claims she is the person best qualified to run the USA and decide if/when we will use nuclear weapons.


13 posted on 10/25/2016 5:40:48 AM PDT by Iron Munro (If Illegals voted Rebublican 50 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: realcleanguy

Im starting to think maybe the $100 bill nuke conspiracy isn’t so crazy..


14 posted on 10/25/2016 5:49:45 AM PDT by CygnusXI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

Sad to say but I believe Hillary and the rest of the ultra left here in America wouldn’t be adverse to starting a nuclear confrontation if they thought it would give them an excuse to set up an extra-constitutional, strong arm government and rebuild the country the way they want it.

They would love nothing more than an opportunity to use the power of the government to eliminate us pesky Bitter Clingers and implement their leftist agenda by force.

Think about Hillary’s history, countenance and demeanor.
It’s apparent that like Obama, she would be more comfortable governing as a dictator than as the president of a constitutional Republic.


15 posted on 10/25/2016 5:54:15 AM PDT by Iron Munro (If Illegals voted Rebublican 50 Million Democrats Would Be Screaming "Build The Wall!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

Actually, there is a bit of positive advice that could be offered to Mr. Putin. That is, there is one thing he has done in several ways, that always seems to work spectacularly well: to support Orthodox Christianity.

He just amazed everyone by holding an Orthodox conclave in Moscow, which brought numerous churches together for the first time in hundreds of years. He is also very friendly with the Russian Orthodox church, who have become intensely loyal to him.

And he has also seen fit to purge Russia of the “fruitcake” pseudo-religions that are generally respected or at least tolerated in the rest of the world.

So the best advice to him is to make Moscow a world capital of Christianity, in its Orthodox and conservative form, rejecting modernist, liberal churches and their perversions of doctrine, as well as abhorring “trendy” changes in faith called for by the anti-religious, secular forces of the world. And to hell with ecumenism with non-Christian beliefs.


16 posted on 10/25/2016 6:14:59 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Friday, January 20, 2017. Reparations end.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Actually, what frightens me about Hitlery is her unbridled temper and penchant for violent reaction. If she gets sufficiently pissed off or thinks Putin’s making her look week and ineffective, I don’t think she would hesitate to order a launch.

“I’m all for nuclear disarmament... You go first.”


17 posted on 10/25/2016 6:16:16 AM PDT by ManHunter (You can run, but you'll only die tired... Army snipers: Reach out and touch someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Strategy

I’d love to see the Russkis shove Clintoon’s DELETE button up her ass.


18 posted on 10/25/2016 6:16:29 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Clintoon will be the "historical" first unindicted felon to sit in the Oval Office. Be proud!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ManHunter

Reagan used to have a saying, “Trust but Verify”. It is my firm belief that his administration is the only one that has ever done this since. This includes both Republican and Democrat Presidents. We have been disarming (nuclear) and haven’t verified shit about what the Russians actually do versus what they say they do.


19 posted on 10/25/2016 6:20:08 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: trebb
Just more "wag the dog", smoke and mirrors BS on behalf of BOTH Russia and Obama-Clinton in an attempt to get voters to rally around the current admin. ie, Hillary. Because, fact is, the Obama-Clinton admin handed Putin everything he wanted on all-important missile defense and nukes, including the Iran nuke deal which Putin loves and claims to have had a major role in.

Who’s in Putin’s Pocket — Clinton or Trump? (Clinton Uranium RussiaGate scandal)

The New American ^ | August 3, 2016 | William F. Jasper

"according to some calculations, the Uranium One deal, involving top Clinton donors Frank Guistra and Ian Telfer, has transferred as much as 50 percent of projected American uranium production to Kremlin control."

***********************************************

RUSSIAGATE

Who paid Bill Clinton's $2.5 million commission & $500,000 speaking fee (US uranium to Russia)

qura.com ^ | July 27, 2016 | Sierra Spaulding

Who paid Bill Clinton's $2.5 million commission and $500k speaking fee for brokering the sale of 20% of America's uranium deposits to Russia?

You are speaking about a really interesting deal that ended up giving Vladimir Putin and the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.

Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. ..."
_________________________________________________

From Real Clear Politics, Sept 10, 2015...

"In a 2014 New Yorker interview, Obama said his goal was to create a 'new equilibrium' in the Middle East.

In the short run, at least, his signature diplomatic undertaking can be counted on to bring more violence to this volatile region.

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, as the [Obama-Putin Iran deal] agreement is formally known, provides the world's leading state sponsor of terrorism an infusion of somewhere in the neighborhood of $100 billion of unfrozen assets and a great deal more of continuing revenues as businesses and governments around the world rush to profit from oil-and-gas-rich Iran's reintegration into the world economy.

The agreement relaxes the international isolation of the Islamic Republic and ratifies Tehran's status as a nuclear threshold state. And it relieves restrictions on Iran's acquisition of weapons, including ballistic missiles. ..."

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2015/09/10/iran_deal_throws_sparks_on_mideast_tinderbox_128034.html
___________________________________________________

Re: The Obama-Putin Iran Deal...

Aug 2015

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
___________________________________________________

 photo Putin KGB - Thanks Obama 01_zpsnqylnyno.jpg

20 posted on 10/25/2016 6:26:57 AM PDT by ETL (Trump-PENCE 2016!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson