Posted on 10/23/2016 8:43:03 PM PDT by conservativepoet
We all knew the corrupt media polls were BS. Now thanks to Wikileaks we know our assumptions were correct. The media was working with Hillary Clinton to release bogus weighted polls that show Hillary ahead of Trump.
And then step two was to declare the election over.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
“...we have lots of freepers and conservatives and patriots who absolutely despise Trump...”
Sad but so true. These folks will be posting FUD all day, every day till Nov 8th. We need to confront them.
Vote Trump 2016
Soros said that he expects Trump to win the popular vote by a landslide but to lose the electoral vote. To me that says that they will use the same scheme that got Obama his second term: cheat in the heavily-democrat precincts of critical toss-up states. Either that, or bribe electors to vote against their popular vote winner.
I only read the headline, but it said that Trump’s people say they’re losing. I presume that would be in the electoral votes. Poll-watchers will be critical. And especially to get video footage of suspected foul play, such as poll-watchers being kicked out and boxes of ballots being brought in.
It is from Wikileaks and actually has too much specificity and the ring of truth to suspect it other than authentic.
What is wishful thinking about it? Do you really doubt at this point that they have the eager media complicity they need for their schemes?
The "smell"? It's a f_©#ing playbook. "Off-the-record" dinners held at F. Chuck Todd's manse, or more memorably the Bobo on the stairs with Soros sitting at the bottom steps...
btt to follow
I wish I saved a pic of Hillary I saw here with the caption “America’s Ex-Wife”.
Classic!
F Hillary and being demoralized.
I’m like Théoden in “The Return of the King”: I’ll ride into battle even if I know there is no hope.
I’m voting against Hillary even if the polls said she was ahead by 50 pts.
Broken Glass!
Faux News has been showing it all morning.
To CNN: If every foreign government has easy access to these secrets, then this is public record.
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/26551
‘I also want to get your Atlas folks to recommend oversamples for our polling before we start in February. By market, regions, etc. I want to get this all compiled into one set of recommendations so we can maximize what we get out of our media polling. -Tom’
ABC arrived at their result by oversampling democrats by +9. What ABC thinks is that 9% more rats will vote in the election than republicans. Now given the support for Trump vs rats (7 million less votes in primary for Hillary then Obama), is their evidence that the +9 is true? The MSM runs with this number so as to demoralize us. As the election nears, they will use more realistic numbers so as to save their reputations once the election is over. Don’t let them demoralize us and vote.
The Arizona poll had a +37 democrat oversample to give Hillary a +5. Who believes 37% more democrats than republicans will vote for her in AZ? Ridiculous.
My concern is not so much clicking on tabs, but that the document in THIS article IS NOT THE SAME DOCUMENT IN THE WIKILEAKS.
I’m really not seeing what that is such a difficult concept here.
TWO. SEPARATE. DOCUMENTS. ONE. LEGIT. ONE. QUESTIONABLE.
Good summary.
“Folks need to step away from the TV—it will be toxic waste for the next two weeks.”
The collective intelligence level of the nation would rise drastically if such were to happen. The results would be almost immediate.
What reads like a fake?
How do you know it’s fake?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.