Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nuclear war 'IMMINENT' as Russia tells citizens to find out where the closest bunkers are
Sunday Express ^ | 02:09, Sat, Oct 15, 2016 | UPDATED: 09:18, Sat, Oct 15, 2016 | PATRICK CHRISTYS

Posted on 10/23/2016 10:53:30 AM PDT by COBOL2Java

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-157 next last
To: TigersEye

Call NOW! 1-800-Glen-Beck.


61 posted on 10/23/2016 12:49:27 PM PDT by OwenKellogg (Our nation is being seeded with enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Who’s in Putin’s Pocket — Clinton or Trump? (Clinton Uranium RussiaGate scandal)

The New American ^ | August 3, 2016 | William F. Jasper

"according to some calculations, the Uranium One deal, involving top Clinton donors Frank Guistra and Ian Telfer, has transferred as much as 50 percent of projected American uranium production to Kremlin control."


62 posted on 10/23/2016 12:49:48 PM PDT by ETL (Trump-PENCE 2016!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Lol! One of them this year was actually a logo from a cracker baking company. But it was really well done (scarily so) - and the company said they knew nothing about it.

It’s probably one of the hottest smuggled products between here and Alpha Centauri.


63 posted on 10/23/2016 12:50:28 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
"Who paid Bill Clinton's [multi-] million commission and $500k speaking fee for brokering the sale of 20% of America's uranium deposits to Russia?

You are speaking about a really interesting deal that ended up giving Vladimir Putin and the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States.

Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies". ..."

(Excerpt) Read more at quora.com ...

64 posted on 10/23/2016 12:50:34 PM PDT by ETL (Trump-PENCE 2016!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OwenKellogg

Money back guarantee if your prepper supplies are vaporized in transit!


65 posted on 10/23/2016 12:52:37 PM PDT by TigersEye (~Questionable Hillary thinks Putin made me post this!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: HWGruene
Good luck, you’ll need it.

It won't happen. People are required to do what they can, yes. But ultimately such an even is in the hands of God. And despite appearances, God still loves us.

66 posted on 10/23/2016 12:54:01 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
It's becoming more and more clear to me every day that the Russians are deliberately throwing out these notions/threats of war in order to get HILLARY elected, not Trump, as voters do not typically like to change course during times of overseas crises. It's a standard "Wag the Dog" scenario. This while she disingenuously huffs and puffs about Russia. Meanwhile, her husband turned over between 20 and 50% of our uranium production to the Russians!

Makes all the sense in the world that this is what they're doing as it was the Soros-supported Obama administration that has been helping to strengthen the Russians.

The O admin, not only handed Putin everything that he wanted on all-important missile defense and nukes, including the Iran nuke deal, which Putin loves and claims to have played a major role in, he (Obama) practically took apart our military. So don't so easily fall for the smoke and mirrors BS coming from the Russians, or this administration. The facts speak for themselves...

____________________________________

From the campaign trail, 2008...

Obama Pledges Cuts in Missile Defense, Space, and Nuclear Weapons Programs

February 29, 2008 :: News
MissileThreat.com

A video has surfaced of Presidential candidate Senator Barack Obama talking on his plans for strategic issues such as nuclear weapons and missile defense.

The full text from the video, as released, reads as follows:

Thanks so much for the Caucus4Priorities, for the great work you've been doing. As president, I will end misguided defense policies and stand with Caucus4Priorities in fighting special interests in Washington.

First, I'll stop spending $9 billion a month in Iraq. I'm the only major candidate who opposed this war from the beginning. And as president I will end it.[i.e. not win it]

Second, I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending.

I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems.

I will not weaponize space.

I will slow our development of future combat systems.

And I will institute an independent "Defense Priorities Board" to ensure that the Quadrennial Defense Review is not used to justify unnecessary spending.

Third, I will set a goal of a world without nuclear weapons. To seek that goal, I will not develop new nuclear weapons; I will seek a global ban on the production of fissile material; and I will negotiate with Russia to take our ICBMs off hair-trigger alert, and to achieve deep cuts in our nuclear arsenals.

You know where I stand. I've fought for open, ethical and accountable government my entire public life. I don't switch positions or make promises that can't be kept. I don't posture on defense policy and I don't take money from federal lobbyists for powerful defense contractors. As president, my sole priority for defense spending will be protecting the American people. Thanks so much.

Article: Obama Pledges Cuts in Missile Defense, Space, and Nuclear Weapons Programs:

http://web.archive.org/web/20090412030633/http://missilethreat.com/archives/id.7086/detail.asp

"MissileThreat.com is a project of The Claremont Institute devoted to understanding and promoting the requirements for the strategic defense of the United States."
__________________________________________________________

From Investor's Business Daily, Jan 2012:

Obama To Betray Missile Defense Secrets To Moscow

Investor's Business Daily ^ | January 9, 2012 | IBD staff

Appeasement: From ObamaCare to recess appointments, honoring the Constitution has not been an administration hallmark. But when it comes to betraying secrets to mollify the Russians, it becomes a document the president hides behind.

It was bad enough that the 2012 defense authorization bill signed by President Obama set America on a downward spiral of military mediocrity.

He also issued a signing statement, something he once opposed, saying that language in the bill aimed at protecting top-secret technical data on the U.S. Standard Missile-3 - linchpin of our missile defense - might impinge on his constitutional foreign-policy authority.

Section 1227 of the defense law prohibits spending any funds that would be used to give Russian officials access to sensitive missile-defense technology as part of a cooperation agreement without first sending Congress a report identifying the specific secrets, how they'd be used and steps to protect the data from compromise.

The president is required to certify that any technology shared will not be passed on to third parties such as China, North Korea or Iran, that the Russians will not use transferred secrets to develop countermeasures and that the Russians are reciprocating in sharing missile-defense technology. ..."

"In his signing statement, Obama said he would treat these legal restrictions as 'non-binding' and that 'my administration will also interpret and implement section 1244 (sic) in a manner that does not interfere with the president's constitutional authority to conduct foreign affairs and avoids the undue disclosure of sensitive diplomatic communications.'

Betraying our secrets is easy for a president who betrayed allies Poland and the Czech Republic to placate Moscow.

Poland was to host ground-based interceptors such as those we've deployed in California and Alaska, with missile-tracking radar deployed in the Czech Republic.

Obama pulled the plug when Moscow objected. Never mind, he said, we have a better approach: a four-phase plan that calls for using three versions of the Navy's Standard SM-3 interceptor missile that forms the backbone of its Aegis missile-defense system.

The fourth phase consists of a missile still on the drawing board scheduled for deployment by 2020, a version of the SM-3 called the Block IIB. It would intercept hostile missiles in the "early intercept" phase before an enemy missile could release its warheads and decoys. The Russians want the SM-3's secrets, and Obama appears to be willing to turn them over.

The president wants to save the New Start Treaty, which the Russians have threatened to abandon if we try to fully implement President Reagan's dream of defeating a nuclear missile attack.

Russia has unilaterally asserted that any qualitative or quantitative improvement in U.S. missile defenses would be grounds for withdrawal from the treaty.

Read More At Investor's Business Daily:
http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/010912-597158-obama-gives-russia-missile-defense-secrets.htm#ixzz3jXmMbVwY
___________________________________________________

March 2012...

"Obama was talking with Russian President Dmitry Medvedev when neither of them realized that their conversation was being picked up by microphones. Here is what they said:

Obama: "On all these issues, but particularly missile defense, this, this can be solved, but it's important for him to give me space."

Medvedev: "Yeah, I understand. I understand your message about space. Space for you ..."

Obama: "This is my last election. After my election, I have more flexibility."

Medvedev: "I understand. I will transmit this information to Vladimir."

"This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility." That statement tells us much about the president's mindset.

The specific mention of missile defense is worrisome enough. Mr. Obama has retreated from the missile defense plan that was negotiated with European allies during the George W. Bush administration.

Apparently, he is signaling Moscow that he intends to retreat further. The clear implication from the president's comments is that he cannot tell the American people before the election what he plans to do after the election.

In addition, there is the phrase "on all these issues," implying more is at stake than just missile defense."

Article: Obama plans double cross on missile defense
When it comes to keeping America safe, we shouldn't be too flexible:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2012/mar/29/obama-plans-double-cross-on-missile-defense/print/
__________________________________________________________

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

 photo Putin KGB - Thanks Obama 01_zpsnqylnyno.jpg


67 posted on 10/23/2016 12:54:50 PM PDT by ETL (Trump-PENCE 2016!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3

24 hours for what?


68 posted on 10/23/2016 12:54:51 PM PDT by Thibodeaux (Exile Barack, Exile the Wookie, Exile Malia, Exile Shasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine
The elites have been pushing collectivism in all its forms (socialism, communism, et al) for the past 200 years to bring about world government. The USA was created for just that purpose. Just look on the back of your one dollar bill.

Depends on which Founder you ask.

69 posted on 10/23/2016 12:56:29 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: metmom

time for US to find the nearest bunkers also.

It would be time to force Hillary, and company, into the nearest bunker and do a Hitler.


70 posted on 10/23/2016 12:59:07 PM PDT by Leep (Just say no to half dead hillary and wrong lane kaine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

Colorado right now is so dry it would burns for years.


71 posted on 10/23/2016 1:00:03 PM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: generally

I suspect he is rubbing Obama’s nose in his own piss to humiliate the worst American President in history


72 posted on 10/23/2016 1:01:11 PM PDT by Thibodeaux (Exile Barack, Exile the Wookie, Exile Malia, Exile Shasha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Thibodeaux

Putin’s way of saying “Why hack your servers when we can live in your heads rent free?” ?


73 posted on 10/23/2016 1:05:37 PM PDT by TigersEye (~Questionable Hillary thinks Putin made me post this!~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Leep

Ja, das boonker.


74 posted on 10/23/2016 1:05:53 PM PDT by JusPasenThru (Democrat mantra: Promise Everything, Deliver Nothing, Blame Others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
Dr. Strangelove: Of course, the whole point of a Doomsday Machine is lost, if you *keep* it a *secret*! Why didn't you tell the world, EH? Dr Strangelove photo: dr. strangelove url.jpg Ambassador de Sadesky: It was to be announced at the Party Congress on Monday. As you know, the Premier loves surprises.
75 posted on 10/23/2016 1:08:16 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers, all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java
Putin knows 0bama is increasingly dangerous because his "flexibility" is running out.

76 posted on 10/23/2016 1:09:05 PM PDT by BitWielder1 (I'd rather have Unequal Wealth than Equal Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COBOL2Java

Putin knows who obama is...a punk who wanted to take “his own country” America down several notches.
I suspect Putin has no respect for a pin head, professional chit disturber, who is WAY out of his league on the world stage.


77 posted on 10/23/2016 1:12:23 PM PDT by Leep (Just say no to half dead hillary and wrong lane kaine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009

Especially when you find that not only are you 20 miles from a military target but also live in a city that is a civilian target.


78 posted on 10/23/2016 1:24:22 PM PDT by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Thibodeaux

Or Putin’s ships will open fire.


79 posted on 10/23/2016 1:31:05 PM PDT by hsmomx3 (Love my Steelers!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
you eventually try to show them you aren’t.

But you ARE! You just think that if you ACT like you're not, they'll back down. But these are guys who have been pushing weenies like you around so long, they've got a pretty good idea who's the real thing and who's just a poser.

Vladimir Putin knows that blecccchhhh Obama is the wimpiest poser to ever soil the White House.

80 posted on 10/23/2016 1:32:50 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-157 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson