Posted on 10/22/2016 9:41:20 AM PDT by kevcol
I have this fun fantasy .... that Trump successfully sues all these MSM outlets and ends up owning them... then every New Years Eve, the masses watch the ball drop from Trump Tower on Trump Square in NYC.
He said after the election. If he loses, then I would sue. It costs the other party time, money, and credibility as well.
Trump just sent a shot across the bow for future accusers. If they continue to come forward, then they may face a law suit as well.
“Don’t file that lawsuit quite yet, @realDonaldTrump, more video coming that HRC was personally involved in directing what happens at rallies”
UH-OH
Great speech. This was not about suing the accusers or even about Donald himself. Exactly the opposite. He basically said “I can’t refute every individual allegation in this coordinated attack over the next two weeks, but I will eventually refute them.”
Trump gave concrete examples of the smears that have been levied against him such as ‘violence’ at his campaign rallies which has now been proven to be the work of political operatives paid by Clinton/Obama. He then said that this wasn’t about himself, but about returning government to the American people. He went on to lay out a very specific agenda, more specific than anything Hillary or any oRepublican leaders have put forward.
It was the best speech I have ever heard Trump give. For the first time, I would call it Reagan-esque.
He can use the Univision money to fund his legal pursuits.
Look, if you have $1000 in your billfold and you saw a $20 bill on the ground you would bend down to pick it up.
And reported by the New Trump Times.
I was hoping that Trump would have more important things to do after the election.
I am soflofreeper and I approve that message.
And after Trump’s expenses, I’d bet he’d donate the money to vets.
Trump just sent a shot across the bow for future accusers. If they continue to come forward, then they may face a law suit as well.
... which the MSM will spin as 'Trump is using his wealth and power to intimate other women into remaining silent'. They also get the chance to harp on the allegations again instead of the policy issues for another news cycle. They'll ignore the holes in their stories (some of which have been outright debunked) and just blather on about it to try to suppress his appeal to women voters.
He doesn’t have to lose he election, just prove reckless or intentional lying and he may get special damages because the defamation was libel (published beyond oral) not just slander (oral).
My point was, Trump does need to prove malice but I think that won’t be too hard for him.
Yes if deliberate attempt which he shouldn’t have a hard time proving because malice requires recklessness or intent.
No doubt Allred has some sort of professional insurance.
‘Motivated by politics” isn’t necessarily malice. Malice requires reckless or intent. “Motivated by politics” may help support the malice element but is not of itself sufficient to prove recklessness or intent.
I’d like to see him go after the news media who use their “freedom of the press” to willingly propagate demonstrable falsehoods intended to MIS-inform the public.
Apparently some Wikileaks emails show such collusion.
If you want to see something that is ridiculous, check out this one:
I am sure this is made up to counter the current NE story on the Clintons.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.