Posted on 10/21/2016 8:56:44 AM PDT by maggief
(Excerpt) Read more at twitter.com ...
The actions of the left when the sting of truth happens.
Check the bobby cover—it’s a woman rider. Look at her hands—no beefy bobby there . . .
I didn’t see that. Do you have a link?
I think that would prove that Hillary was NOT “joking” when she asked if they couldn’t just drone Assange.
And if that’s the case - as Assange’s sources (who were obviously there at the meeting where she said it) told him - then the US public needs to know that they are considering electing somebody who would use the US military to drone attack anybody who opposes her.
Wikileaks exposed that the dems are using a shell company to try to frame Assange as a pedophile. Reddit posters found corroborating evidence also, and in response to the Reddit investigation, the head of that goup tweeted that they have control over all the drones in the world and would hit the Redditors. Right after somebody noted that on Reddit this dem operative locked his Twitter account. I commented on that in an earlier thread. That sounds a lot like Hillary, with whom he was photographed. And it doesn’t sound like a “joke” - especially if the democrat powers-that-be are trying to designate Assange as a terrorist so they CAN drone strike him as Hillary tersely suggested in the meeting, in the presence of people who then went to Assange with it...
My internet connection was not dead, but I could not open or run programs. Was my hard drive being raided? This is in Delaware, ISP is Verizon DSL. My AVG icon disappeared.
Europe heavily hit, as well as up ad down east coast. Tried using direct IP addresses fro youtube, none worked.
This is Obama’s war against his enemy. Us. I hope the pepole who stayed home on election day are happy
we should Be aware that Snowden took ‘Everything’. I’ll speculate that means Offshore Banks Accounts of hundreds of politcians, all sorts of HUMINTELL Assets, and more juicy tidbits. Thats Snowdens life Insurance Policy
Wikileaks very Likely has similar life Insurance
Thanks for the link.
Of course, as I have been posting lately, the danger of a Mrs. Clinton Presidency is not limited to her continuing to sabotage our values. She really has no grasp of how a productive economy even works.
That a woman who has been politically active, her entire adult life, among a people with the most successful history of economic achievement over their first century and a quarter, of any people on earth, under a Constitutional Government designed to protect that people from a bureaucratic pestilence, which has been the bane of most nations; that such a woman has so missed the essential point of the American achievement, is staggering in its implications.
Mrs. Clinton claimed that a Clinton Government would rebuild the "Middle Class." Was she totally unaware that the American Middle Class clearly built itself? That the American Middle Class resulted from naturally energized individuals, aspiring to achieve the good life, who risked everything to first clear a wilderness, work hard, generation to generation, to save & accumulate the attributes of the good life; with the result that by 1913--the year that a graduated income tax first became Constitutional, this Settler built Federation of newly settled States, had already surpassed every one of the great powers of Europe in industrial strength.
To "rebuild" the "Middle Class," Mrs. Clinton vowed to make the most successful Americans--those who had achieved the most--pay increased taxes; she called it "paying their 'fair' share." But it was clearly to be a tax on success--a tax to fund a raft of new programs (a cancer or pestilence of an expanded bureaucracy). She was obviously indifferent to the fact that the biggest impediment to any poor person with ambition, actually launching a small business to improve his status, is an almost incomprehensible explosion in bureaucratic regulations, most of which premised on the same flawed understanding of how people actually advance, which Mrs. Clinton displayed, last night.
Americans used to learn by experience. What were the experience based lessons of what transpired from the drafting of our written Constitution in 1787, until the passage of the income tax amendment in 1913? Are they instructive or not, for what actually works for human advancement?
The Constitution prior to 1913, absolutely interdicted a tax driven war on the accumulation of individual wealth. Article I, Section 9, which Mrs. Clinton should have remembered from Law School, provided that no direct tax on individual Americans could be applied in any way but pro-capita. (That is Warren Buffet would pay the same tax--not the same percentage tax--but the same tax as Joe the Plumber. The Founders had no desire to limit individual success. They sought only to encourage it.
Under there experience based philosophy, there were almost certainly not even 1% of the bureaucratic regulations, with which Americans seeking to improve their lot, must face today. In place of today's pursuit of grievances, real or imagined, there was universal admiration for the high achievers! And the growth rate of a people freed to achieve, was the economic phenomenon of human history.
We do not pretend to know whether it was in her indoctrination by Marxist Pied Pipers, in her late teens, or pure confusion in whatever she is struggling with today. But Mrs. Clinton is utterly clueless on how a dynamic economy works; as she is utterly unaware of the dynamic, interactive factors, that drive or stagnate any human aspiration or achievement. What is absolutely clear, even if one ignores her lack of a moral compass in her political dealings; the woman is absolutely unqualified to be President of the United States.
This is one more reason why we must win this election for Donald Trump.
William Flax
[This may be reproduced, if in full context, with or without attribution.]
Redditt was doing some interesting research into a failed attempt to entrap Assange (or kill him) by getting him to agree to do a cameo spot in a television commercial for an online dating service to air November 7th.
The premise was for Assange to agree to a $1,000,000 appearance fee and allow a video crew into the embassy to film him. They wanted a bank account number where the money would be sent and form him to acknowledge receipt of said funds by tweeting some cryptic message to @realdonaldtrump.
The whole thing got rolled back up to some CIA consulting firm with ties to Larry Summers and the Clinton campaign. The same group has also filed a claim at the United Nations that Assange engaged in some Anthony Weiner like sexting with an underage girl using their website.
Very complicated and obtuse stuff that these domestic enemies were engaged in, and that the Redditters were able to untangle. More here:
He REALLY better have a back up system ‘cause they’re gonna bring him down...
Either way, WikiLeaks WILL expose extensive political corruption.
http://www.gizmodo.co.uk/2016/10/4chans-trying-to-get-julian-assange-back-online/
From the UK. 4chan is trying to get Assange back online.
Wondering if Operation Hot Pockets explains th he police presence...
Example: The mass donning of "Black Lives Matter" shirts in Seattle, by people at least educated enough to have teaching certification! No one with enough self-confidence to employ common sense, could be so stupid. The BLM--Soros backed group--are a major threat to actually protecting millions of Black families, who need more, not less Police protection. (The Left has created many of these bizarre anomalies, with its promotion of a grievance pursuit mentality--the oldest tool of demagoguery, useful throughout the history of human corruption.)
None whatsoever.
She could saw his head off on prime time TV and the MSM would swear she never did it. And her gullible followers would believe them.
It’s just the Progressives projecting their much bragged about transparency while ensuring freedom of speech.
Update - Our engineers continue to investigate and mitigate several attacks aimed against the Dyn Managed DNS infrastructure.
Oct 21, 17:53 UTC
They might be able to just hook up a surplus rooftop dish to a Wi-Fi and point it at the embassy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.