This whole kerfuffle really says a lot about Democrat intentions. Gore, Kerry, and Clinton are all on record complaining about election results not being fair. Bush was “selected” not “elected”. It’s well-established.
Now they want Trump to pledge to unilaterally allow any shenanigans to be accepted. No matter what happens. No matter how obvious the fraud. Trump has to say upfront that he will not “cause trouble”.
Pretty blatant on the Dem’s part. Their plan is clear. But Trump is throwing a monkey wrench in the works by saying “I’ll look at the situation”.
It wasn’t supposed to go down like that.
Two comments:
1) I was surprised that Chris Wallace popped this question at the end of a reasonably well-moderated debate. Maybe he was trying to be cute and resurrect the "pledge to support" question of the GOP primary. Maybe not.
2) The media jumping on this almost in unison isn't surprising. Maybe the whole thing was set up in advance. Certainly, Hillary's "Horrible" comment dovetailed into this in a way that doesn't seem spontaneous. Some of the presstitutes were even talking about Trump supporting "potential violence" if the election results weren't to his liking. "How un-American!"