Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ClearCase_guy
Now they want Trump to pledge to unilaterally allow any shenanigans to be accepted. No matter what happens. No matter how obvious the fraud.

Two comments:

1) I was surprised that Chris Wallace popped this question at the end of a reasonably well-moderated debate. Maybe he was trying to be cute and resurrect the "pledge to support" question of the GOP primary. Maybe not.

2) The media jumping on this almost in unison isn't surprising. Maybe the whole thing was set up in advance. Certainly, Hillary's "Horrible" comment dovetailed into this in a way that doesn't seem spontaneous. Some of the presstitutes were even talking about Trump supporting "potential violence" if the election results weren't to his liking. "How un-American!"

18 posted on 10/21/2016 6:11:47 AM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Pearls Before Swine
I was surprised that Chris Wallace popped this question at the end of a reasonably well-moderated debate. Maybe he was trying to be cute and resurrect the "pledge to support" question of the GOP primary. Maybe not.

That was so obvious as to be comical.

Simply another lame "GOTCHA! question, a la "Memememegyn Kelly"

Is it really true?
Mememememegyn's viewership has tanked?

She could grow into a so-so weatherchick, I think. Just put on another 40 pounds or so.

34 posted on 10/21/2016 9:55:47 AM PDT by publius911 (IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson