Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Single men will get the right to start a family under new definition of infertility
UK Telegraph ^ | October 20, 2016 | Henry Bodkin

Posted on 10/20/2016 11:53:15 AM PDT by C19fan

Single men and women without medical issues will be classed as “infertile” if they do not have children but want to become a parent, the World Health Organisation is to announce.

In a move which dramatically changes the definition of infertility, the WHO will declare that it should no longer be regarded as simply a medical condition.

The authors of the new global standards said the revised definition gave every individual “the right to reproduce”.

(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: homosexualagenda; infertility; lgbt; looneyleft; reproduction; sex; who
A practical effect of this Leftist positive rights moon battery is the state might be required to pay for surrogacy. A single man can go to the gov't and say he wants to be a father. So the state foots the bill to pay for a willing surrogate.
1 posted on 10/20/2016 11:53:15 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Without the true God in your life, mankind’s logic is revealed as madness.


2 posted on 10/20/2016 11:56:18 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

There’s an old saying that “two wrongs don’t make a right.”


3 posted on 10/20/2016 12:07:07 PM PDT by Pearls Before Swine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Another way to give small boys to the pedophile homo’s.

WHO isn’t fooling anyone.


4 posted on 10/20/2016 12:07:30 PM PDT by MichaelCorleone (Jesus Christ is not a religion. He's the Truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

That’s nice. I am so glad all other problems were solved


5 posted on 10/20/2016 12:13:31 PM PDT by Mr. K (Trump is running against EVERYONE. The Democrats, The Media, and the establishment GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan; Tax-chick
I guess the taxpayers will have to recruit and pay a reproductive concubine for the gay or single man. If a willing one cannot be had even for pay, will they start drafting women for the job?

No word here about whether this new "right" to have a baby solo, collides with a baby's right to have an identified, committed-for-the-long-term (= married) mother and father.

That right doesn't exist, you say?

///Sigh///

Apparently children have no needs that have to be recognized, no rights which a reproductive consumer adult is bound to respect.

`

`

6 posted on 10/20/2016 12:27:26 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o ("Satisfying the immediate desires of adults requires indifference to the suffering of children.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

So, a single man has some unalienable right to reproduce???

Okay, so we’re saying, he doesn’t need to think about finding a girl to marry???? Really????

The way the biology works, a single woman can decide to have a child on her own. But having trouble getting my arms around the concept of how a single man is going to have a biological child, if that’s his desire, without the mother involved.

I am what the liberals call “hetero normative” and “binary” in my thinking. I’m so stilted in my thinking, that I think about children having a mother and a father, a mother being a female and the father being a male. And that I am thinking that this is somehow “normal”, hence my “hetero normative” thinking.

Send me to re-education camp right now.

I’m so confused by this business. And I’m just hung up on the man/woman/mother/father/two sexes thing. We haven’t even gotten yet to the 56 different gender identities found on Facebook and other media.......


7 posted on 10/20/2016 1:11:27 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Communists use the usurpation and degradation of language to further their unnatural ideology.


8 posted on 10/20/2016 2:10:15 PM PDT by YogicCowboy ("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

So the state foots the bill to pay for a willing surrogate.

Or perhaps a not so willing surrogate!
Are you not willing to support the State citizeness?


9 posted on 10/20/2016 2:13:31 PM PDT by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan
A practical effect of this Leftist positive rights moon battery is the state might be required to pay for surrogacy. A single man can go to the gov't and say he wants to be a father. So the state foots the bill to pay for a willing surrogate.

I'll go even further with this insanity. If (not likely) a willing surrogate can't be found, someone will be CONSCRIPTED into providing the service involuntarily. After all, if it's a "right," then others cannot hinder it by non-participation.

Thanks, queers.

10 posted on 10/20/2016 2:20:32 PM PDT by fwdude (If we keep insisting on the lesser of two evils, that is exactly what they will give us from now on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

Will they have a right to buy children at a fixed “fair” price, or will they have to bid on the open market? If we call this “reproductive prostitution,” are we being hateful? What if we call it “slavery”?


11 posted on 10/20/2016 2:50:03 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Pardon me, are you Aaron Burr, sir?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

This is just so evil.

“The coming Chthulu presidency will be heralded by a worldwide wave of madness,” as some wag said.


12 posted on 10/20/2016 3:05:52 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Pardon me, are you Aaron Burr, sir?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

13 posted on 10/20/2016 3:08:39 PM PDT by Daffynition (*Donald Trump represents the WILL of the PEOPLE.*~ Don King 09.24.16)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: C19fan

Another Gaystapo attack on the family. Guess they need to have it eliminated so children won’t be exposed to ANYTHING G-dly.


14 posted on 10/20/2016 8:35:58 PM PDT by NetAddicted (Just looking)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson