Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

PENTAGON OFFICIALS FURIOUS AFTER CLINTON ANNOUNCES US RESPONSE TIME FOR NUCLEAR LAUNCH DURING DEBATE
Liberty News ^ | 10/20/16 | JENNA LEIGH RICHARDSON

Posted on 10/20/2016 8:38:09 AM PDT by BagCamAddict

Following Wednesday’s presidential debate Pentagon officials found themselves completely dumbfounded as to why former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton would feel it appropriate to announce U.S. Special Access Program intel on national television.

According to sources within the Department of Defense speaking under anonymity, Clinton likely violated at least two Dept. of Defense SAP protocols during the debate by announcing on live television the United States Government’s response time for a nuclear launch.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clinton; debate; hillarynuclearleak; nuclearresponsetime; responsetime; trump; trumphillarydebate3
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-259 next last
To: nralife
Snopes is missing something very important. It is one thing for a blogger to claim something. I've seen TS information on the web - as something some people believe. But it is vastly different for someone with direct knowledge to confirm it! After all, anyone can guess at anything. There may be 150 guesses floating around. But no one knows because there is no confirmation.

I once asked why XXX was considered classified. I was told, "People can suspect or guess anything they want, but this document would be US government proof of their guess."

A former Secretary of State just said X is the real number. Of course, she is so stupid that she might not really know the answer...

181 posted on 10/20/2016 10:19:55 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of infants, ruled by their emotion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
"While Secretary Clinton was extremely negligent in revealing our nuclear response time, she didn't intend to do anything wrong. No reasonable prosecutor would pursue this."


182 posted on 10/20/2016 10:20:42 AM PDT by Deo volente (Our Independence Day is at hand, and it arrives on November 8th.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro

How do you know she wasn’t paid to release this information worldwide?


183 posted on 10/20/2016 10:21:37 AM PDT by cyclotic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

“Why am I Bringing this up?”
Why did/would you capitalize the word, “bringing”?
;^}


184 posted on 10/20/2016 10:22:23 AM PDT by GOYAKLA ( Pick-up the pace, I'm eighty-one!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: BagCamAddict
Thx to youtube and social media, the opportunity to call her out is still at hand...and it can and will be done by someone with more experience in national security than Trump.

The Trump campaign will see to it.

185 posted on 10/20/2016 10:22:45 AM PDT by RoosterRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

Follow the money.


186 posted on 10/20/2016 10:25:22 AM PDT by DPMD (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BagCamAddict

But...but... but, she’s the smartest woman in the world??!!


187 posted on 10/20/2016 10:29:19 AM PDT by SMARTY ("What is freedom? To have the will to be responsible for one's self. "M. Stirner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BagCamAddict

Even though Traitorhillary betrayed the United States last night in the debate, and should be tried and convicted for her crime, discussing whatever extremely classified information she revealed would still be a violation of U.S. laws on classified information.


188 posted on 10/20/2016 10:46:26 AM PDT by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: timestax
 photo 30c6e6fb-2b1b-4ed2-ba3c-f75a6c0f0b2f_zpsogy1utwj.jpg

189 posted on 10/20/2016 10:48:20 AM PDT by timestax (American Media = Domestic Enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Pride in the USA
It should be. But I looked at the source for the article (who?), then checked google to see who else was reporting it. No MSM. Then checked snopes and see that they've already issued some cockeyed "debunking" of it.

See? It didn't happen. And if it did happen, it wasn't important. Now can we all get back to what's really important, please? Have you seen Gloria Alldred's latest woman that Trump groped?

190 posted on 10/20/2016 10:58:49 AM PDT by lonevoice (diagonally parked in a parallel universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: caww

did you capture this from video? link?


191 posted on 10/20/2016 11:00:23 AM PDT by smileyface (Things looking up in blue PA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse

So in other words there are no consequences for a presidential candidate who put 300 + million lives at risk by leaking US nuclear secrets.


192 posted on 10/20/2016 11:05:04 AM PDT by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: caww

"The balloons, Huma! I see the balloons! Red, blue, white!"

"That's nice, Hillary. Let's go to the van. The doctor's got your special juice."

"Mmmm! Yummy yummy juice!"


193 posted on 10/20/2016 11:06:15 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled. - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: BagCamAddict

She put it on her twitter account too


194 posted on 10/20/2016 11:23:49 AM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Pig

It’s legit. I heard it, it’s on the debate video and she bragged about it on her twitter account.


195 posted on 10/20/2016 11:27:19 AM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: BagCamAddict

Maybe they went over Pentagon rules at the same meeting they covered protecting classified information.


196 posted on 10/20/2016 11:28:39 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lonevoice; smileyface

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/788916533573591040


197 posted on 10/20/2016 11:29:32 AM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

Comment #198 Removed by Moderator

To: lonevoice; Little Pig; BagCamAddict; All; 444Flyer; Nachum

The launch times were posted again on her twitter account last night!

https://mobile.twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/788916533573591040

Then she makes some sort of remark about Trump & 4 minutes which I didn’t understand

https://mobile.twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/788917471399014402


199 posted on 10/20/2016 11:35:51 AM PDT by HollyB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: HollyB

I don’t think anyone’s claiming that she didn’t say it. We all heard her say it.


200 posted on 10/20/2016 11:36:10 AM PDT by lonevoice (diagonally parked in a parallel universe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 161-180181-200201-220 ... 241-259 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson