YUUGE! TRUMP VICTORY!
Immediate reaction was that it was a draw. Both were rather awkward. Scored it a draw.
Next morning, the one residual left over for me the next morning is that Hillary Clinton is eager to start a nuclear war. Her cannot be exposed to the public without doing something extremely skin-crawling creepy. Going to rescore as a Trump win, on that basis - not an earned win.
Which she may well have read.
I’m surprised and relieved.
I thought it was mostly a draw but this is great news.
I don’t care how we get the win, I want to win.
cuz otherwise she’s going to kill all of us
Despite all the smoke and mirrors, the perfectly tailored suit, the expensively coiffed hair, the super rehearsed answers, I think Hitlery came across as the biggest BS artist on two feet. Hopefully the rest of the country saw that as well.
HUUUUUUUUUUUGE TRUMP TRUMP TRUMP!!
I bet Hillary, Ryan, little Marco and Bill are making plans for a different kind of future - Hillary and Bill for flight to Dubai and little Marco and Ryan for political oblivion.
Go General Fynn!!!!
Ol’ Shrillery better watch out with this open borders stuff. Because Ted Cruz thinks he and the missus have first dibs on the Big Mahaff and Mahaffette of MexAmeriCana. Goldman Sachs promised it, for him screwing over Trump!
Trump will win Leegly and bigly.
It was an excellent victory for Trump.
Every word out of that *itches mouth, including the “ands,” “ifs,” and “buts,” was a flat-out lie.
I wonder is Obama is rallying the UN blue helmets and DHS brownshirts in case of a Trump victory. It would be GREAT to hear Trump say, “”Why are you whining? We kept you voter fraud schemes to a minimum so the true victor could emerge” while holding up pics of all the Smartec voting machines being removed shortly before the polling opened. Would love to seems stompyfeet fo off and cry to Daddy Warbucks Soros while Trump had an inbound trace on the call with Spec Ops team ready to capture him on the spot for extradition for war crimes and a litany of other crimes.
I wonder if Obama is rallying the UN blue helmets and DHS brownshirts in case of a Trump victory. It would be GREAT to hear Trump say, “”Why are you whining? We kept your voter fraud schemes to a minimum so the true victor could emerge” while holding up pics of all the Smartec voting machines being removed shortly before the polling opened. Would love to seems stompyfeet go off and cry to Daddy Warbucks Soros while Trump had an inbound trace on the call with Spec Ops team ready to capture him on the spot for extradition for war crimes and a litany of other crimes.
“[Hillary] wants like a United States of North America not a United States of America.”
Lest we forget: http://www.cfr.org/canada/building-north-american-community/p8102
Heidi Cruz - CFR “Task Force” Member
Harry Truman once said that you could not get rich in politics unless you were a crook. The Clintons have amassed over $250 million during their years in politics, and want even more. Corrupt Hillary is a lying sick old crook, who accepts bribes and betrays our country. Everything she says and does, or causes to be said or done, must be viewed with the utmost suspicion. Her promises are worthless, unless they enrich her in some way. Her husband is a rapist and a pedophile whom she has actively enabled
That a woman who has been politically active, all her entire adult life, among a people with the most successful history of economic achievement over their first century and a quarter, of any people on earth, under a Constitutional Government designed to protect that people from a bureaucratic pestilence, which has been the bain of most nations; that such a woman has so missed the essential point of the American achievement, is staggering in its implications.
Mrs. Clinton claimed that a Clinton Government woujld rebuild the "Middle Class." Was she tottally unaware that the American Middle Class clearly built itself? That the American Middle Class resulted from naturally energized individuals, aspiring to achieve the good life, who risked everything to first clear a wilderness, work hard, generation to generation, to save & accumulate the attributes of the good life; with the result that by 1913--the year that a graduated income tax first became Constitutional, this Settler built Federation of newly settled States, had already surpassed every one of the great powers of Europe in industrial strength.
To "rebuild" the "Middle Class," Mrs. Clinton vowed to make the most successful Americans--those who had achieved the most-- pay increased taxes; she called it "paying their 'fair' share." But it was clearly to be a tax on success--a tax to fund a raft of new programs (a cancer or pestilence of an expanded bureaucracy). She was obviously indifferent to the fact that the biggest impediment to any poor person with ambition, actually launching a small business to improve his status, is an almost incomprehensible explosion in bureaucratic regulations, most of which premised on the same flawed understanding of how people actually advance, which Mrs. Clinton displayed, last night.
Americans used to learn by experience. What were the experience based lessons of what transpired from the drafting of our written Constitution in 1787, until the passage of the income tax amendment in 1913? Are they instructive or not, for what actually works for human advancement?
The Constitution prior to 1913, absolutely interdicted a tax driven war on the accumulation of individual wealth. Article I, Section 9, which Mrs. Clinton should have remembered from Law School, provided that no direct tax on individual Americans could be applied in any way but pro-capita. (That is Warren Buffet would pay the same tax--not the same percentage tax--but the same tax as Joe the Plumber. The Founders had no desire to limit individual success. They sought only to encourage it.
Under there experience based philosophy, there were almost certainly not even 1% of the bureaucratic regulations, with which Americans seeking to improve their lot, must face today. In place of today's pursuit of grievances, real or imagined, there was universal admiration for the high achievers! And the growth rate of a people freed to achieve, was the economic phenomenon of human history.
We do not pretend to know whether it was in her indoctrination by Marxist Pied Pipers, in her late teens, or pure confusion in whatever she is struggling with today. But Mrs. Clinton is utterly clueless on how a dynamic economy works; as she is utterly unaware of the dynamic, interactive factors, that drive or stagnate any human aspiration or achievement. What is absolutely clear, even if one ignores her lack of a moral compass in her political dealings; the woman is absolutely unqualified to be President of the United States.
This is one more reason why we must win this election for Donald Trump.
William Flax
[This may be reproduced, if in full context, with or without attribution.]
That a woman who has been politically active, all her entire adult life, among a people with the most successful history of economic achievement over their first century and a quarter, of any people on earth, under a Constitutional Government designed to protect that people from a bureaucratic pestilence, which has been the bain of most nations; that such a woman has so missed the essential point of the American achievement, is staggering in its implications.
Mrs. Clinton claimed that a Clinton Government woujld rebuild the "Middle Class." Was she tottally unaware that the American Middle Class clearly built itself? That the American Middle Class resulted from naturally energized individuals, aspiring to achieve the good life, who risked everything to first clear a wilderness, work hard, generation to generation, to save & accumulate the attributes of the good life; with the result that by 1913--the year that a graduated income tax first became Constitutional, this Settler built Federation of newly settled States, had already surpassed every one of the great powers of Europe in industrial strength.
To "rebuild" the "Middle Class," Mrs. Clinton vowed to make the most successful Americans--those who had achieved the most-- pay increased taxes; she called it "paying their 'fair' share." But it was clearly to be a tax on success--a tax to fund a raft of new programs (a cancer or pestilence of an expanded bureaucracy). She was obviously indifferent to the fact that the biggest impediment to any poor person with ambition, actually launching a small business to improve his status, is an almost incomprehensible explosion in bureaucratic regulations, most of which premised on the same flawed understanding of how people actually advance, which Mrs. Clinton displayed, last night.
Americans used to learn by experience. What were the experience based lessons of what transpired from the drafting of our written Constitution in 1787, until the passage of the income tax amendment in 1913? Are they instructive or not, for what actually works for human advancement?
The Constitution prior to 1913, absolutely interdicted a tax driven war on the accumulation of individual wealth. Article I, Section 9, which Mrs. Clinton should have remembered from Law School, provided that no direct tax on individual Americans could be applied in any way but pro-capita. (That is Warren Buffet would pay the same tax--not the same percentage tax--but the same tax as Joe the Plumber. The Founders had no desire to limit individual success. They sought only to encourage it.
Under there experience based philosophy, there were almost certainly not even 1% of the bureaucratic regulations, with which Americans seeking to improve their lot, must face today. In place of today's pursuit of grievances, real or imagined, there was universal admiration for the high achievers! And the growth rate of a people freed to achieve, was the economic phenomenon of human history.
We do not pretend to know whether it was in her indoctrination by Marxist Pied Pipers, in her late teens, or pure confusion in whatever she is struggling with today. But Mrs. Clinton is utterly clueless on how a dynamic economy works; as she is utterly unaware of the dynamic, interactive factors, that drive or stagnate any human aspiration or achievement. What is absolutely clear, even if one ignores her lack of a moral compass in her political dealings; the woman is absolutely unqualified to be President of the United States.
This is one more reason why we must win this election for Donald Trump.
William Flax
[This may be reproduced, if in full context, with or without attribution.]