Posted on 10/20/2016 6:31:26 AM PDT by COUNTrecount
“It’s been a year and now we’ve finished our last debate and I’m feeling relieved and very grateful,” Clinton said.
“But I just wanted to come back and say hello. Some of you have been on the trail the whole time. No more debates.
“No more naps,” she said as her face cringed.
After taking a couple questions, she was asked about the Project Veritas videos appearing to show Democratic National Committee operatives bragging about triggering violence at Donald Trump rallies.
“I know nothing about this. I can’t deal with every one of his conspiracy theories but I hope you all have something to eat, something to drink on the way back to New York!” she told the reporters.
Three minutes after her Q & A started, it was over.
What a weird thing to say. Does that mean she is going to start going to rallies again, with those huge crowds she draws?
342 White House visits but it’s all just a conspiracy theory, huh..?
sure!
Some media availability 3 minutes, and no real input on the bombshell video that makes fools of all of them.
Clintonesque signal. I have your back, you should have been the ones doing this type of investigative work, but I will never expose that fact.
Like the Russians its all a conspiracy against me... go print that...
“Weird affect”
Which one this time....flat, angry, snoozy/souced, or howdy-doody?
If Hillary wins I will be convinced that the system is rigged and will quit bothering to vote after voting in every election, state, local and national since 1978.
I think it was Mark Twain who said if voting mattered they wouldn’t let us do it.
“Weird affect”
Which one this time....flat, angry, snoozy/souced, or howdy-doody?
#####################
Bemused zombie.
“No, it was weird enough to justify caps. She is almost talking in her sleep. Gets energized a tiny bit when the orchestrated violence disclosures came up.”
I’m sorry. I should have been clearer. I simply meant to correct your use of “affect” rather than “effect.”
I shall lay down my grammar police badge for the rest of the day, I promise. :).
To me, that is just another indicator that this $hit is rigged.
AND, that she is totally unfit for command.
She has a 1.5 hour debate after sleeping for a week and acts like she just ran a marathon. Yeah she’s definitely fit to be the POTUS
Quick Huma change her batteries
“She has a 1.5 hour debate after sleeping for a week and acts like she just ran a marathon. Yeah she’s definitely fit to be the POTUS”
I take very slight consolation in what the job will do to her, should she get it. Both W and Obama entered the office looking fit and healthy, and both look like winos in suits now.
She already has the wino bag lady look. If she gets into the Sullied House, she will probably leave it feet first.
She thinks about sleeping, eating and drinking. Basic functions. Things campaign related are dismissed.
So. Who’s going to be running the show if Hillary! gets erected? Obviously, she’s not.
Trump doesnt look so bad
In Dumbocrat world, video = “theory”.
BTW, I saw a clip of a CNN panel discussion where they tried their best to discredit O’Keefe; kept calling him a “CONVICTED criminal”:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KGPAmXqvHU0
Of course they never stated what his supposed crime was.
The crime, it turns out, was what used to be called “investigative journalism”:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_O%27Keefe#Criminal_conviction_.282010.29
Nobody remembers 60 Minutes, Dateline, 20/20, Michael Moore, or anybody else doing the same types of things or sometimes much worse.
I guess it’s just a matter of who you dare to investigate, which was the protective intent of the First Amendment in the first place.
BTW, I saw a clip of a CNN panel discussion where they tried their best to discredit O’Keefe; kept calling him a “CONVICTED criminal”:
Bob Creamer, Democrat author of this conspiracy, is also a “criminal” and visited the White House 342 times. 42 of those visits with Obama supposedly.
By the way, here’s a perfect example of the MSM getting away with the “crime” that O’Keefe was CONVICTED of. And this was just 2016; doesn’t include any of their past escapades.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/04/60-minutes-hidden-camera-nrcc-222526
The biggest difference? It was Republicans they were investigating, not Democrats.
Yes. She doesn’t have a drinking problem. She never spills a drop!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.