Click The Pics To View Full Size  |
These false polls serve several purposes. Besides intimidating opposition voters and bolstering voters in their corner, the polls add a feeling of legitimacy to their win when the commit fraud. “See, it was close, anyway.”
Much better than trying to explain how they won when the polls showed it to be impossible.
People need to wake up and take this electronic vote counting fraud seriously or it will be over before we know it!
Trump ~ 65%
hIllary ~ 27%
Consider Brexit too.
The MSM is in the tank for hillary. If Trump was ahead in the polls, do you think they would report it?? Hell no.
To answer my above premise, I think that Trump is doing much much better than what the polls are indicating.
psy-ops is the first tool in the leftist arsenal, to denigrate and wear down resolve and hope. This is outright lying, but what problem do Dems have with that?
The EPIC Brexit polling failure offers further proof that political polls are not intended to discern public opinion but to influenece it. They just think we are too stupid to realize it!
From a piece in American Thinker after the Brexit vote:
For the weak-minded among us who continue to believe in polling data, the Brexit vote shows – yet again – what a biased absurdity the polls have become.
But delusions and obfuscation runs deep in the mainstream trenches.
Nate Cohn at the New York Times writes that “[i]t was not a cataclysmic polling failure[.] ... [I]t’s hard to argue that this was a big polling failure.”
Sure it wasn’t. Once you are done rolling around on the floor in laughter at claims that this wasn’t a massive polling failure, read on.
To review, the Brexit side won by 4%, 52% to 48%.
Not a single one of the well known polling aggregators/predictors picked Brexit in their last-minute final projections.
Elections Etc. had the Remain side up by 6.6%, 53.3% to 46.7%.
Number Cruncher Politics had the Remain side up by 6%, 53% to 47%.
What UK Thinks: EU had the Remain side up by 4%, 52% to 48%.
The Financial Times had the Remain side up by 2%, 48% to 46%.
Britain Elects had the Remain side up by 1.6%, 50.8% to 49.2%.
HuffPost Pollster had the Remain side up by 0.5%, 45.8% to 45.3%.
The Economist’s poll tracker had the race tied at 44% apiece.
Thus, we had a systematic bias in the aggregated polling data that ranged from 4% to almost 11%.
Individual polls leading up to the vote were publishing ridiculous results. In the week prior to the vote, 9 of the 13 polls predicted a victory for Remain ranging from 1% up to 10%. Just three polls had Leave in the lead, but just by 1% to 3% – i.e., still below the actual margin of victory – and one poll had a tie. Not a single individual poll got the result correct, or overpredicted a Leave win.
A.B.Stoddard said similar a month ago regarding stories and polls. I haven’t seen her on Fox since.
In 2012 I believed the unskewed polls. I was waiting for the Romney landslide. I never expected Zero to win. It was very traumatic to me.
Now I cant but help worry over the polls.
I can't imagine that things were any more acrimonious in 1860 . . .
| Click The Pics To View Full Size |
make this go viral
Who ya gonna believe - the lying, skewed polls or your eyes - He’s still bringing in tens of thousands - filling arenas
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zCb_lmE1SJ0
At some point soon the polls have to reflect reality if the pollsters want to have any future credibility.
And don’t be too sure about a Trump landslide. Not all the polls are cooked. It will come down to the better GOTV effort.