Replies

There’s one problem;
MSN WEBTV stopped all service on Mon Sep 30, 2013

From: brentbbi@webtv.net
To: john.podesta@gmail.com, roy.spence@gsdm.com
Date: 2016-01-21 20:36
Subject: Hillary almost 100% negative

____________

I wondered about that since I was a webtv used back in the late 90s...Maybe he carried his email addy over? I thought when I read the actual email in full that it came from an ipad.

There were many WebTV users here on the forum even to the time it shut down.

You couldn’t carry that email address over, when MSNBC shut down WebTV, that was it! Gone!

--I wondered about that since I was a webtv used back in the late 90s...Maybe he carried his email addy over? I thought when I read the actual email in full that it came from an ipad--.

I still use an @webtv.net addy through Outlook.

Found these by googling the email address:

Brent Budowsky

Brent-Budowsky-175Brent Budowsky served as Legislative Assistant to U.S. Senator Lloyd Bentsen, responsible for commerce and intelligence matters, including one of the core drafters of the CIA Identities Law. Served as Legislative Director to Congressman Bill Alexander, then Chief Deputy Whip, House of Representatives. Currently a member of the International Advisory Council of the Intelligence Summit. Left government in 1990 for marketing and public affairs business including major corporate entertainment and talent management. He can be reached at brentbbi@webtv.net.

Source LA Progressive

Brent Budowsky Columnist

Brent Budowsky served as Legislative Assistant to U.S. Senator Lloyd Bentsen, responsible for commerce and intelligence matters, including one of the core drafters of the CIA Identities Law. Served as Legislative Director to Congressman Bill Alexander, then Chief Deputy Whip, House of Representatives. Currently a member of the International Advisory Council of the Intelligence Summit. Left government in 1990 for marketing and public affairs business including major corporate entertainment and talent management. He can be reached at brentbbi@webtv.net.

Source Huffington Post

Many more that seem current

https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=brentbbi%40webtv.net

Anyone able to verify the authenticity of the headers? And my apologies if this look wonky, just signed up and haven't quite figured out the posting/formatting here Delivered-To: john.podesta@gmail.com Received: by 10.25.24.226 with SMTP id 95csp3940173lfy; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 14:36:31 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.60.227.104 with SMTP id rz8mr36134104oec.45.1453415790083; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 14:36:30 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from BAY004-OMC3S23.hotmail.com (bay004-omc3s23.hotmail.com. [65.54.190.161]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sb9si3081207oec.5.2016.01.21.14.36.29 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 14:36:30 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of brentbbi@webtv.net designates 65.54.190.161 as permitted sender) client-ip=65.54.190.161; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of brentbbi@webtv.net designates 65.54.190.161 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=brentbbi@webtv.net Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.54.190.187]) by BAY004-OMC3S23.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Thu, 21 Jan 2016 14:36:29 -0800 Received: from CY1PR17MB0204.namprd17.prod.outlook.com (10.163.51.146) by CY1PR17MB0202.namprd17.prod.outlook.com (10.163.51.144) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.390.13; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 22:36:27 +0000 Received: from CY1PR17MB0204.namprd17.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.51.146]) by CY1PR17MB0204.namprd17.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.51.146]) with mapi id 15.01.0390.013; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 22:36:28 +0000 From: Brent Budowsky To: "john.podesta@gmail.com" , "roy.spence@gsdm.com" Subject: Hillary almost 100% negative Thread-Topic: Hillary almost 100% negative Thread-Index: AQHRVJwqrP3zWD/RIUSSFjdKr2cAtg== Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 22:36:27 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=webtv.net; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [s5zpFdamT2BFVSg/h0IF9JHPdSu5Uji5] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;CY1PR17MB0202;23:+tlCAH9w6d1cpbwB04gTBtJX8lD1C2/E8rfo98oQnz3D7IWp4HRtdXrXfe/J6CXi+QiWV4Z8Qo+FeU/k6i06lnGH1SF6JFskjiRjyXxNir75NNPsHdS0NklMW+Ef1DNS9UzXIKm0LOgts2GteN30ctAv46UsEnA0RCw2H6kk4YvyDJH18Jih811PwdZSwf0H1f1rd2X5gwvJdahZXDXSzg==;5:65518fxwOQ3JbxpJlgBtf6OB4P9VKopwwvhGwt90vAJQ7Lc2YEmqgl7wSRUOC2fIfEQigmt6j+nLXEyJcJGzIXWK/lId+kmw83JFrqi7Ls7Hnfnf/CPzX7aPR5xVa3Pu7bV4OieA2YRfO+zeDzQjXA==;24:o+v/Kr04yL33eeDDD1WWP7M+PZM6yePNQoM08pHD3Ch0Gv29B/WnYLxBgpzLTmHCMRr0AvtEckg/9Qi+8xGZe+ccpIp9KdJ6Soaitj64InA= x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR17MB0202; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 1cb50266-343c-40f9-f03a-08d322b34d48 x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(432015012)(82015046);SRVR:CY1PR17MB0202;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:CY1PR17MB0202; x-forefront-prvs: 08286A0BE2 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(7070004)(98900002);DIR:OUT;SFP:1901;SCL:1;SRVR:CY1PR17MB0202;H:CY1PR17MB0204.namprd17.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <28EA097C2F97984EA6A6721F7BD44B1D@sct-15-1-318-15-msonline-outlook-9143d.templateTenant> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: sct-15-1-318-15-msonline-outlook-9143d.templateTenant X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Jan 2016 22:36:27.8613 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: CY1PR17MB0202 Return-Path: brentbbi@webtv.net X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jan 2016 22:36:29.0569 (UTC) FILETIME=[2BB9E710:01D1549C] Almost every message being projected outward from her campaign is negative,= and a candidate with high distrust ratings should not be doing this, and m= y phone has been ringing and my email box has been full with Democrats who = like me who support her but who, like me, are appalled and losing confidenc= e. I have never seen anything like this. This campaign is devoid of positive messages, uplifting appeal, and coheren= t rationale. And bluntly, it is getting to the point where every word she utters, there = are more young people and first time participants in politics who support B= ernie who would not support her in a general election no matter how hard I = and others try to persuade them.....and whoever persuaded her that running = for Obama's third term is the way to win a general election is far removed = from American politics in 2016, and if they think she can constantly shift = her position they do not understand the depth of distrust of her and the da= mage it does.... and they do not understand in the modern communications environment she can= not be a centrist one day and a liberal the next day because images and imp= ressions are formed and locked in far earlier than in the 1970's to 1990's. This is a campaign that has never had a compelling rationale and now has lo= st its way into a sea of negativity.....the way for her to be elected is to= solve the first problem, and develop some uplifting reason for voters to s= upport her, and not to create a second problem, running a negative campaign= without a positive message and vision..... 8 point programs, no matter how worthy, do not create a purpose or a ration= ale or an inspiration......negative politics from a candidate with high neg= ative ratings attacking a candidate with positive high ratings is the polit= ical road to hell. I strongly suspect she has been sold a bill of goods from Obama consultants= who became Hillary consultants, but whoever is the cause, and whatever is = the motive, something is horribly and terribly wrong with this campaign....= .and when Dan Pfeiffer says on CNN that this is not a change election he ha= s his head nine feet up his ass.....this is a change election, dammit, and = Hillary Clinton is running as the candidate of the status quo and that is t= he worst possible place to be.....and her sycophantic adoration of Obamacar= e is absurd and totally out of touch with the reality of general election p= olitics.... This campaign is in very, very big trouble and I see zero evidence that Hil= lary Clinton either understands this, or understands why.... I hope others are being as candid with you, and the Clintons, as I am. I a= ssure you my view expressed here is very widely shared among people who con= sider themselves her friends.....Brent Sent from my iPad=