Posted on 10/12/2016 6:47:16 AM PDT by PJ-Comix
This is an off-the-record cocktails with the key national reporters, especially (though not exclusively) those that are based in New York. Much of the group includes influential reporters, anchors and editors. The goals of the dinner include:
(1) Give reporters their first thoughts from team HRC in advance of the announcement
(2) Setting expectations for the announcement and launch period
(3) Framing the HRC message and framing the race
(4) Enjoy a Frida night drink before working more
YES
1. ABC - Cecilia Vega
2. ABC - David Muir
3. ABC – Diane Sawyer
4. ABC – George Stephanoplous
5. ABC - Jon Karl
6. Bloomberg – John Heillman
7. Bloomberg – Mark Halperin
8. CBS - Norah O'Donnell
9. CBS - Vicki Gordon
10. CNN - Brianna Keilar
11. CNN - David Chalian
12. CNN – Gloria Borger
13. CNN - Jeff Zeleny
14. CNN – John Berman
15. CNN – Kate Bouldan
16. CNN - Mark Preston
17. CNN - Sam Feist
18. Daily Beast - Jackie Kucinich
19. GPG - Mike Feldman
20. Huffington Post - Whitney Snyder
21. MORE - Betsy Fisher Martin
22. MSNBC – Alex Wagner
23. MSNBC - Beth Fouhy
24. MSNBC - Phil Griffin
25. MSNBC – Rachel Maddow (TBD)
26. MSNBC – Rachel Racusen
27. NBC – Savannah Gutherie
28. New Yorker - Ryan Liza
29. NYT – Amy Chozik
30. NYT - Gail Collins
31. NYT - Jonathan Martin
32. NYT – Maggie Haberman
33. NYT – Pat Healey
34. PEOPLE - Sandra Sobieraj Westfall
35. POLITICO – Glenn Thrush
36. POLITICO - Mike Allen
37. VICE - Alyssa Mastramonoco
38. VOX - Jon Allen
HRC TEAM RSVP (14)
1. John Podesta
2. Robby Mook
3. Huma Abedin
4. Marlon Marshall
5. Amanda Renteria
6. Jennifer Palmieri
7. Kristina Schake
8. Jesse Ferguson
9. Nick Merrill
10. Karen Finney
11. Jim Margolis
12. Joel Benenson
13. John Anzalone
14. Mandy Grunwald
Posdesta is rattled.
So much so he is claiming the emails have been altered.
They could have a video of her punching a puppy after snorting a line of cocaine off the ass of hooker and people would still line up to vote for the broad.
If Assange doesn't take down the Clinton dynasty he will never draw a free breath....
Also, it makes you wonder, who is up next, when they finish with Podesta’s. ? :)
Of course he could, but he won’t.
I record ABC so I can fast forward through their dump Trump reporting. Not one word on emails. Not one.
I’m still waiting on a single story about WikiLeaks to show up on the CNN.com website. Complete news blackout it seems.
This is like an advent calendar for a corrupt campaign. While I do think that it is good to stagger these releases, I wonder if this daily trickle is essentially akin to white background noise. For maximum effect, I wish they’d pick the most damning and drop them on a weekly basis leading up to the election. And the Trump campaign should be all over what she said about blacks (chronically underachieving even when given ample opportunities) in an earlier leak. This should be front and center in debates and campaign ads along with some nuggets she included about Muslims, etc.
What is this now? Like about 2% . . . I would kind of prefer that he release the most damaging - don’t know what impact they will have in the last couple of days.
He’s on Fox 10 at 5,6, and 9 with Kari Lake.
LIVE: People tweeting to Podesta. He’s getting the heat.
https://twitter.com/search?f=tweets&vertical=news&q=%40johnpodesta&src=typd
I remember a couple of weeks ago when Assange made his video announcement, some people on here were about ready to jump ship, a lot of them really disappointed that it was just an announcement of intent.
I remember he also said he would be starting this in the next 10 days. He kept his word, now it’s trickling out. A bit late maybe, but it’s coming out.
I think he knows what he’s doing, and probably saving some real gems for a couple of days before the election.
I’ve seen some people wondering why he isn’t dumping anything on Trump. Well, it seems Trump has the good sense to avoid email, so there are none. Nothing to dump. I suppose he has computers that could be hacked, and that might happen, but after all this I suspect he’s smart enough to make sure nothing incriminating is there.
Hillary and her puppets obviously didn’t have that much presence of mind...
I’ve been wondering who will be next too. Cheryl Mills? Huma? Tim Kaine? Blumenthal?
Oh man I just had a thought...what if...Hillary had everything on her server transferred to a new one and THAT one got hacked...Then it gets dumped a couple of days before the election...
No wonder she deleted them!
Bet she oinked all day monday after seeing the numbers.
Not the outrage over the stolen emails. But, when it comes to the illegally recorded and illegally released Trump tape, no comment from the LSM.
Head over the the_donald subreddit to see weaponized autism at work!
https://m.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/
One problem is that there may not be a single zinger email. It’s the emails in aggregate that are the story. It’s the pattern of corruption that they show.
It’s like someone who cusses in the heat of the moment vs. someone who drops the F-bomb in every conversation. The first person blurted out something and might regret his language. For the second person, it’s his “normal.”
Hitlery’s “normal” is corruption and collusion. If she had ONE TIME mistakenly taken money from a foreigner who was ineligible to donate to her campaign, I could overlook that. But she solicits money from foreigners on a regular basis. If she had ONE TIME asked the media to brush a minor incident under the rug, I could overlook that. But she is completely in bed with the media and coordinates with them on a regular basis. And on and on and on.
It’s the pattern, not the single smoking gun. Patterns can be a lot harder to see for the average person. Someone needs to sort out the relevant dots and connect them in order for most people to see the picture.
The Wikileaks people are pretty sharp. I’m fairly confident they have this information backed up and ready to roll out from multiple places. I’m fairly confident that trying to shut them down would be like cutting one head off the hydra : two more grow back.
I agree with you, though, that they might decide to do one massive dump to get it all out. I wonder what their game plan is and why the drip, drip, drip. Is what they release at any given time a strategic decision? Or are they checking them for things that really might endanger innocent people and releasing them after they’ve passed inspection? Is there some sort of end game?
More collusion ...
From:jpalmieri@hillaryclinton.com
To: hdr29@hrcoffice.com, jsullivan@hillaryclinton.com, john.podesta@gmail.com, ha16@hillaryclinton.com Date: 2015-07-08 16:25
Subject: NYT story on costs of policy proposals
Madame Secretary et al – I wanted to give you an update on NYT pending story on costs of policy proposals. Brian and I, with help from Jake and Neera, fought hard on this. I had pretty frank conversations with them about what an unfair story would do as a further setback in the relationship. Maggie thinks it is responsible and that we are not going to have a problem with it – it will have all the caveats that HRC has not actually proposed these policies, and has said that we will pay for any new policies. She is going to read me the story later today off the record to further assure me. I will let you all know how that goes.
Jen
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.