Posted on 10/12/2016 6:39:43 AM PDT by bryan999
RE: Blue Dress
That was already DNA tested by the FBI laboratory, and matched to Clinton with a very high degree of probability. Really we don’t need another DNA sample from the dress, or from Clinton himself, if we could just get our hands on the DNA profile that the FBI already assembled.
The problem is, I believe the actual DNA profile is still kept confidential by the FBI as part of an agreement made when Clinton agreed to supply his blood sample for comparison. They released the results of the test, but not the DNA profiles themselves:
“Kendall wrote Bittman again, agreeing that the president would provide the requested sample under several conditions. Kendall’s letter said their correspondence and the test results should be treated confidentially”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/eviblood092298.htm
Any story that focuses on the corrupt, morally bankrupt Clintons and keeps the spotlight on them is important right now.
Racist DemocRats assume the kid and his mom are liars because they are black.
CNN chief and Atheist-Progressive and his demonic cult believe ALL truth as it pertains to exposing the Clintons and 0bamas transgressions are "hoaxes."
Without exception, how exactly did Atheist Progressive-Marxists wind up totally monopolizing the Media and advancing The Lie without some kind of political balance?
Seek medicinal help. And don’t give up your fixated day gig as a kiddy-party clown.
We don’t call it the Clinton News Network for nuttin’!
Yes, there was dna on the blue dress, but Ken Starr used the dna only to prove it belonged to Clinton. It was not the full dna that could be used thereafter for paternity, fr’instance. Or so I read the other day, I think on the UK Daily Mail online. The UK Daily Mail also had a picture of the dress and said it was up for auction????
He and Webb need to take a DNA test for Chelsea.
Clinton may not be related to any uncles on the Clinton side. He’s a Blythe, but not even that, because he was born 6 months after Billy Blythe returned from WW2.
His children (would be Bill’s grandkids) are truly adorable.
JMO, but I feel this is yet another diversion.
Not to mention, the young kid pic looks more like obama to me:
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/19/nyregion/letters-by-and-about-barack-obamas-father.html
Trump needs to invite this guy to the next debate. Along with the same women at the last debate.
This is a revived issue. This has been out there since Clinton’s presidency. I personally think there’s a good likelihood it’s true.
Is it a diversion right now? I think so.
Clinton should have to own up to it sometime.
If he’s his kid, his mom and him should be compensated. And that’s by leftist standards as well as my own.
You father a kid and you take responsibility. You support him.
Clinton took a pass on that. It’s time to face the music.
Drudge would not touch the story about Cruz’s bimbos supposedly because he lacked verification
If he is running this story he must have something
But personally- what difference does it make? I care more about Hillary selling our national security to the highest bidder
At least one black person will gain something from the Clinton Foundation
LOL
I suspect of someone’s dead body.
I remember seeing it years ago. Nothing came of then, which is why it seems suspicious that it’s brought up now.
I was looking over on CNN’s site, and there’s nothing about the WikiLeaks docs.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.