To: Mr. Douglas
“We dont need permits for anything, even a house.”
—
That comment made me do a double-take.
I live in Eastern MA-—regulation hell.
A friend of mine had a stone patio in front of a house she had lived in for 30 years.
She wanted to tear up the patio and build a deck over the same area.
The city said no because it was a “structure” and there wasn’t enough set-back from the property line.
She fought it-—and lost.
.
51 posted on
10/06/2016 12:31:27 PM PDT by
Mears
To: Mears
It’s one of the reasons I moved here. That, and the annual property taxes on my 20 acre property adjacent to my original 12 acres - including two streams, a 40 x 60 barn and a natural well, are the price of a loaded family sized pizza.
54 posted on
10/06/2016 12:34:34 PM PDT by
Mr. Douglas
(Today is your life. What are you going to do with it?)
To: Mears
"She wanted to tear up the patio and build a deck over the same area."
I live just north of Seattle, and the same thing happened to an adult home in my neighborhood. They built a ground level wooden deck in their front yard, so the residents could sit outdoors in nice weather, and the city made them tear it down for some reason. It appeared to be well off the property line.
A few years earlier, the city allowed the property behind me to be subdivided, and the back wall of one of the houses is only about six feet from my property line. The previous house was about fifty feet from the property line. Go figure.
77 posted on
10/06/2016 12:46:20 PM PDT by
Steve_Seattle
("Above all, shake your bum at Burton.")
To: Mears
That's how it is here in central PA too. you can build a deck without a BUILDING permit, if none of it is more than 20” above ground. You still have to have a zoning permit though, so they know you are only putting it where you are allowed. Plus, it gives them a record of everything. The state is creating a state-wide GIS map, so they can know where everything is on their property, because that's how they interpret being a Commonwealth - it's all really theirs and we are just allowed to use it, when they approve.
153 posted on
10/06/2016 2:06:57 PM PDT by
Kay Ludlow
(Government actions ALWAYS have unintended consequences...)
To: Mears
My dad was a builder out west in the post-WWII boom who gave up on it after the regulations ate into his profits. Not just regs. but the *time* spent to gain permissions could be used to make money elsewhere. He explained that the sameness in buildings is caused by these regs. To maintain profitability, developers stick to one paint color and shape. Truly sad esthetically.
282 posted on
10/07/2016 6:14:27 AM PDT by
The Westerner
("Giving Away the Internet or Any Part of It Is Sheer Lunacy" Jim Robinson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson