Posted on 10/03/2016 10:18:32 AM PDT by ColdOne
Sen. Claire McCaskill (D., Mo.) on Sunday excused Hillary Clintons negative comments towards the women with whom Bill Clinton allegedly had extramarital affairs because what she has done for women and children outweighs those statements.
Fox News host Chris Wallace and McCaskill discussed Donald Trumps latest attack against Hillary Clinton regarding her husbands past sex scandals.
I think his point with regard to the sex scandals isnt what Bill Clinton did, its more what Hillary Clinton did and whether she really is a champion of women because, the fact is, over the course of these years, she has gone after a number of women about allegations that turned out to be true, Wallace said to McCaskill.
(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...
The moral equivalence with this one defies logic!
Sure Claire. Oh, by the way, have you been fitted for you burka yet? You’ll be needing it for next Ramadan.
What the Hell has she done for anyone outside of herself and her donors?
And just what has she done ‘for women’?.............
Why?
Because he is a liberal an is down for the cause.
Nothing is more important than The Progressive Goals.
Nothing.
What the ‘H’ has ‘H’ done for women? Can’t think of a thing from this side of the Acer 24”.
I heard the same sort of thing about Ted Kennedy when he died.. liberals are sick people
Agreed. I wonder if she’s had a conversation with the woman who was the victim of the child rapist Hillary defended all that time ago?
So Claire in essence what you are saying is that it is ok that Hillary vilified and smeared all of Bill’s victims so they could keep in power, and by keeping in power Hillary was able to generally help other women?
Even to the destruction of America.
Two things (first one completely off subject):
Every time I see “Free Beacon,” I think of “FREE BACON!” and it makes me smile!
Secondly, I could swear that comment that McCaskill made was referring to Donald Trump—does she not see the irony?
“What DONALD TRUMP Has Done for Women Outweighs His Negative Comments About Them.”
Claire is on tape stating she would NOT want Bill Clinton near her daughter.
Played on morning Fox show interview. Claire claims she ‘mispoke’ back then.
I bet it really makes those millennial women voters want to flock to the polls to vote for Hildabeast....Sarcasm....sort of?
Well, she has never done anything for me!! I stayed home to raise three kids in the 90’s. Oh, she is not into those who chose to stay home, bake cookies types.
As Anita Hill said, when asked about Bill’s predatory history, ‘well, you really have to consider his voting record’. Sexually assaulting must be ok as long as he votes the right way........by any means necessary......moral equivalence personified.
Presuming that’s true about H, why doesn’t Trump get the same consideration?
Bravo Sierra
Other than women who wanted to kill their babies, what has she done for women?
We know she has enabled her rapist husband.
That is the primary progressive goal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.