Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oh My: Is Hillary Planning to Put Loretta Lynch on The Supreme Court?
Townhall.com ^ | September 30, 2016 | Katie Pavlich

Posted on 09/30/2016 12:09:09 PM PDT by jazusamo

Oh My: Is Hillary Planning to Put Loretta Lynch on The Supreme Court?

Earlier this year when President Obama was searching for late Justice Antonin Scalia's replacement on the Supreme Court, Attorney General Loretta Lynch was reportedly on his short list of potential nominees. During the process, in which it quickly became clear whoever was nominated would not get a vote in the Senate before the election, Lynch withdrew her name from selection.

Attorney General Loretta Lynch has asked not to be nominated to the Supreme Court, a Department of Justice spokeswoman said Tuesday.

"The Attorney General determined that the limitations inherent in the nomination process would curtail her effectiveness in her current role," DOJ spokeswoman Melanie Newman said in a statement.

But now with the election just 39 days away, the rumor mill is swirling with chatter Democrat Hillary Clinton is planning to consider Lynch for the Supreme Court should she win the White House.

There’s been some speculation that Loretta Lynch, the attorney general of the Department of Justice, could be on Mrs. Clinton’s short-list. Mrs. Clinton already floated the idea to The New York Times in July, that she would like Ms. Lynch to stay on and serve in her administration.

If Clinton were to nominate Lynch to the Supreme Court, it would only bolster accusations of corruption and would put the private, secret meeting between Lynch and Bill Clinton on her private plane just days before the FBI announced a non-indictment over Hillary's email server in July, into a whole new perspective.

Supreme Court aside, if Clinton wins she is reportedly planning to keep Lynch as Attorney General.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016election; hillary; hillaryscotus; lynch; lynchscotus; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: guido911
VOTE TRUMP and stop planning for the witch....

be positive instead of negative....

jeepers people....

21 posted on 09/30/2016 12:27:13 PM PDT by cherry (<p>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Completely agree. Justice Lynch would be a minor annoyance compared to the utter political/social cancer that would be visited upon our nation under a HiLIARy presidency. Just rename the country Northern Mexico.


22 posted on 09/30/2016 12:29:31 PM PDT by scottinoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

How about this for a nightmare? Lynch, Obama, and Holder.

#blackmarxistsupremecourtjusticesmatter


23 posted on 09/30/2016 12:30:56 PM PDT by Deo volente (The islamists want to eradicate us, and will never stop. We need to eradicate them first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Ah-ha! Now we know what the infamous airplane meeting with Bill was all about!

No threats, just promises.


24 posted on 09/30/2016 12:33:43 PM PDT by FrankR (You're only enslaved to the extent of the charity that you receive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

yeah except TRUMP will win by a landslide and
LORETTA HILLARY BILL JAMES ERIC CHERYL HUMA VALLERY
and the rest of the LIBTARD scumbag criminal crew will be in court not sitting on it....
they must have nightmares


25 posted on 09/30/2016 12:42:14 PM PDT by zzwhale (no way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zzwhale

Amen to that.

Go Trump!


26 posted on 09/30/2016 12:43:53 PM PDT by jazusamo (Have YOU Donated to Free Republic? https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

The Joycelyn Elders of the Justice Dept.


27 posted on 09/30/2016 12:45:34 PM PDT by 556x45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Her or Eric Holder - maybe both.....


28 posted on 09/30/2016 12:53:13 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Intolerant in NJ

How about Webb Hubbell?

Anyway, she is going to lose the election so “at this point, what difference does it make?”


29 posted on 09/30/2016 1:07:29 PM PDT by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Pearls Before Swine

Lynch would be a “two-fer”—black and female. Plus Holder is too old...they want someone who will be on the Court for a very long time.


30 posted on 09/30/2016 1:32:58 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

They better add Steel Reinforcing


31 posted on 09/30/2016 1:48:33 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

So that’s what her and Bill did on the Plane


32 posted on 09/30/2016 1:49:53 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Whoever she puts there will with “Republican” support vote with the four Democrats there on every issue, or 97 percent of the issues. No deliberations needed


33 posted on 09/30/2016 2:16:10 PM PDT by Theodore R. (Trump-Pence, 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

If I were Hillary and won the presidency, the first person I would nominate would be Lynch.

Unlimited “Get out of jail free” card.

CWII might be right around the corner.

5.56mm


34 posted on 09/30/2016 2:22:31 PM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

I sure Hope the Senate would never go for that.


35 posted on 09/30/2016 2:24:33 PM PDT by Robert357 (D.Rather "Hoist with his own petard!" www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1223916/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Bill arranged this on the tarmac remember, keep quiet go along and this is what we will do for you


36 posted on 09/30/2016 2:26:50 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stingray51

I thought Hubbell died - sure he can still vote, but SC justice may be a bridge too far....


37 posted on 09/30/2016 4:01:27 PM PDT by Intolerant in NJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: guido911

38 posted on 09/30/2016 4:23:08 PM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? A liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nohing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Why doesn’t the media ask her who she intends to put on the court?


39 posted on 10/01/2016 4:31:07 AM PDT by nikos1121 (I am way more deplorable than you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fwdude

You’re right. They’ve already confirmed her before. Obama has been in office over 7 1/2 years and the Senate just had the fortitude to over ride his veto for the first time. They are worthless.


40 posted on 10/01/2016 4:49:33 AM PDT by Typelouder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson