She looks like she has slathered on 10 pounds of wall spackle to fill in the ruts and wrinkles.
HILLARY AT THE DEBATE THE REAL HILLARY
She was reading her answers from her notes, so as usual, she had the questions in advance. Do you think Leftist NBC wouldn’t do this “for the greater good?”
She sure uses her scratching nose/chin signal quite a bit, doesn’t she?
A lot of crazy theories out there, but this one seems to be true.
Ping!
The bitch still lost support no one wants her not even her husband.
Ping!
Stuffing ballot boxes, planting stories in the media, cutting Bernie Sanders off at the knees. Democrats never play by the rules. One doesn’t want to fall prey to every conspiracy theory, but I would not discount this.
Looks like she would do poorly at a poker table.
collusion? Perhaps but not necessarily. I don’t believe the MSM has to give questions in advance to the Clinton team. It’s not necessary. Just like I don’t think Al Qaeda or ISIS necessarily have to micromanage every suicide bombing. When people believe a shared idealogy they can act independently yet to the outside it appears to be orchestrated.
The MSM is quite predictable. Hillary’s team had no problem anticipating obvious questions and preparing for them.
tax return
birth certificate
Iraq
jobs & economy
fairness
etc etc
I believe some people may be overthinking this.
Wow, this is really good! Everyone - click on the link, watch the video!
Interesting tells....or very dry skin problems?
Damn right this is collusion. Get this out to Drudge and Rush pronto. With the reputation that Illary has it is bound to resonate among voters BIG LEAGUE
I didn’t watch the Debate.
If I had, I would be out buying a new TV today.
Trump talks about the massive National Debt and how the Government squanders Taxpayer Money and Hillary responds that we wouldn’t have it if Trump paid Federal Income Taxes?
How does she even get applause for such an idiotic statement.
My Hat is off to the FReepers who sat through that and reported it on the Debate Thread last night.
BTW - Hilary does not remind Men of their Ex Wives, she reminds them of their Ex Mother In Laws, the ones who colluded with their Ex Wives to destroy their Marriages.
That's because I think people are starting to see the bias within the press. The lies they put forth to protect her from negative comments. The coverups regarding her health issues. The acceptance of Federal Agencies, Justice Department & FBI, allowing her to escape prosecution, while anyone else would have faced prosecution, along with persecution by the press. All of these things are opening the eyes of more and more people, and I believe they do not like the realities they are witnessing.
Coupled with the obvious corruption within the government, people are silently supporting anybody but Hillary, which even includes Donald Trump now. Their fears of our government now outweigh their fears of a Trump Presidency.
Agreed. This is very good. Evokes the movie Rounders.
She looks like she has slathered on 10 pounds of wall spackle to fill in the ruts and wrinkles.
HILLARY AT THE DEBATE THE REAL HILLARY
*** TRUMP should address the American people and say this in his opening statement at the next debate:
“To all of you Americans watching tonight. As you watch this debate, take note of the following:
I am NOT here to debate BOTH the moderator AND my opponent — as was the case last time when the moderator stepped in with false corrections to what I said and argued several points with me. That’s called being tag-teamed.
That is inappropriate behavior for a moderator in a presidential debate. Candy Crowley did that to Mitt Romney in the 2012 debate with Barack Obama and he was too weak to fight her on it. Unlike Mitt Romney, I will call the moderator out on inappropriate behavior immediately. To those of you in the audience, if you notice the moderator is debating AGAINST me, please verbalize this phrase: “MODERATOR FOUL!” — because if the moderator is not following the rules, why should the audience follow the rules of not clapping or booing?
Those of you watching tonight, I’d like you to:
1. Notice how many softball questions they give my opponent compared to how many personal attack questions they direct to me. That’s because the mainstream media is in pockets of the Democratic Party, in case you hadn’t noticed. This is called “media bias.”
2. Notice how when I make a good point, the moderator tries to shift attention away from the point that was made or interrupts me — but doesn’t do the same for my opponent.
3. Notice how calculated Hillary is when she has that fake smile plastered on her face while citing far-fetched allegations about me. I’m a real person. My opponent is a phony and a fraud. Just look at all the scandals that have swirled around Hillary and her husband for the past 30 years. It’ll make your head spin. That someone with an astonishing history of dishonesty tries to pin fraudulent behavior or racism on someone like me is unacceptable and embarrassing to her.
4. When politicians don’t have a valid argument against their opponent on principles, they resort to ad-hominem attacks. I may attack her record (deleting 33,000 emails and being against protecting our borders), but I do not do ad-hom attacks, although there are so many I could do. For example, when she cited likely false allegations from a mere handful of my past employees many years ago, I could equally have cited all the nasty things her personal secret service agents have said about working for her. Or many other “hear-say stories” in her past. But that’s petty.
Those of you watching are smart enough to see the phony person that is here on the stage with me.
Let’s stick to the issues tonight.
Thank you, Donald Trump.
BTTT
If this is collusion, look deeper...
One of the biggest foreshadowings was the final question on accepting the results of the election. Holt and Clinton think any answer from Trump will be a win for them.
If he says “yes”, they can defraud the election.
If he says “no” or “maybe”, they can say he’s unstable.
Trump said “yes” (to accept) and that’s good.
This question tells us that fraud is coming. The fraud will be apparent and he’ll be right to challenge it - if/when it happens.
save