Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson

Who “won” the debate is irrelevant. Clinton performed better, and was more polished. Trump missed some opportunities to undermine her, and will probably prepare more next time. But neither undermined their own campaign, nor did either “knock out” their opponent.

Clinton still comes across as an establishment insider, recycling the same policies. My wife used the word “condescending” to describe her.

I would be surprised if this debate strongly impacts the polling trends one way or another. Trump has gained because people do not like, no do they trust Mrs. Clinton.

Just my $0.02.


62 posted on 09/26/2016 8:25:06 PM PDT by drop 50 and fire for effect ("Work relentlessly, accomplish much, remain in the background, and be more than you seem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: drop 50 and fire for effect

I tend to agree with your perspective. Clinton got under Trump’s skin and he came across as unpolished, defensive and somewhat arrogant.

That said, Clinton came across as incredibly smug. The image of her smirking, smiling and laughing was a horrible one. Truly horrible!

If this was a boxing match, she would win on points because her offense was better than his defense. She mostly ignored his offense, like a polished politician.

However, this is not a boxing match nor a POTUS race that we have seen before. A true outsider is running. If people want change, they will find Trump’s lack of polish refreshing. If they want the same old, same old, they will fall for Clinton’s typical politician performance.


120 posted on 09/26/2016 8:52:23 PM PDT by neocon1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson