Posted on 09/24/2016 7:15:43 AM PDT by Hojczyk
"When you criticize her, she goes nuts. She becomes very defensive and angry, damn near throws you out of the room," Morris said. "So her staff learns not to cross her and they just do not subject her to the kind of criticism, and the kind of advice that normally candidates get.
"Morris predicted Clinton will not necessarily show anger during Monday night's presidential debate, but Republican Donald Trump could rattle her enough that she deviates from her script.
"I think she'll get uptight and I think that she'll lie and I think she'll try to sell stuff that isn't true that people will see isn't true, and I think that that's going to be the defect," Morris said.
Morris noted that Trump needs to steer clear of the offensive version of himself that he often displays on the campaign trail if he wants to fare well Monday at Hofstra University.
"And it's kind of easy to do that because he really isn't that way," Morris said.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
An Examination of the Effectiveness of the Stooge-Style Eye-Poke as a Debating Device:
I always find it quite entertaining to encounter anti-gunners who are obviously on the edge. If you find yourself debating one it pays to have something on tap that could crack 'em like an egg.A few years back I ran into a local politico who loved to yammer on endlessly about "AK-47s which can kill our kids from hundreds of yards away." I kindly pointed out that due to the poorly-designed sights and crudely-crafted ammunition commonly available for those rifles, even a competent marksman (not to mention an addled crackhead) would find it hard to nail a target as small and fast-moving as the average grade-schooler would present at even, say, 75 yards.
The lady immediately dropped her fairly calm policy-wonk mask and launched into an extremely-detailed, marathon hissy about how all gun-owners are despicable monsters who should be locked up -- BaddaBing, the truth at last! While red and shaky by the end, she unfortunately did not end up popping a critical vessel. It was a great laugh all the same.
I actually picked up on this tactic from an old friend who used to be an occasional guest on local radio. During nasty debates over various and sundry, he'd wait until a commercial break, lean over to his opponent, and whisper something like, "So, your momma didn't breast-feed you enough, or what?" and then feign surprise when the bonehead started hyperventilating just as the engineer started the countdown for the next segment.
Many of the gun-banners are so maniacally certain that they are on the side of the angels that a simple, utterly childish eye-poke can occasionally completely unhinge them. The best way to employ this tool is "live", when you can pounce on the resulting momentary brain-lock and close in for the kill. It is less useful in print situations, where a response will more than likely be composed after the initial anger passes, but can still be handy for laying the groundwork for a future encounter. Pick out something that promises to tweak off your target, and include some reference to it in all of your relevant correspondence to the press. Then, when you eventually get the chance to square off against the weasel, you can drop in a tangential reference to your past insults which will sound completely innocent to anyone else, but should yield approximately the same result as a direct attack.
Trump as regards women:
* Hires women at all levels of his organization, including executive
* Pays female employees equally to men in comparable positions
* Gives female employees paid maternity leave
* A woman designed & built Trump Tower, the first woman to do so in NYC
* Daughter Ivanka runs a significant portion of the family business
Hillary as regards women:
* Pays female staffers significantly less than male counterparts
* Takes tens of millions of dollars from countries that abuse, mutilate, torture, and murder women
* Advocates Socialist economic policies that impoverish everyone, including women of any status: married, single, with or without children
* Cheerleads for abortion on demand at any stage of pregnancy — half the murdered pre-born children are female
* Enabled and supported a serial adulterer, sexual molester, and rapist for 40+ years. Waged campaigns of denial, suppression and intimidation against her husband’s many victims.
My question to the hag.
Does a law abiding citizen of the US, who lives in the inner city, have the right to own a gun? If not why not?
Best response on this thread.
Do you know what might push hillary over the edge better than anything at the debates? If they want to bring in cuban to sit in the front row to agitate Trump. Then get someone of the same build as Seth Rich to where the American flag clothes he was pictured in.......in the front row..
and have him slump in his chair like he is dead...
Ah Huh. Let her try that. That will bring it all up again and to the front.
Trump has got this. He’s sat with high powered execs who make their living trying to squeeze concessions and money out of people using whatever tactics they possibly can. In essence Trump is walking into a board room KNOWING he’s got the best position and expecting that the entire room is going to be hostile and try to tear down that position. He’s been there, done that. Clinton has gotten deference and kowtowing all her life. That ends Monday night.
I crack up every time i see this...
I’m sure she does too....
What? What? The Queen doesn’t like it when the little people don’t kiss her butt? I never would have guessed it...
Yes, particularly narcissists.
DONALD TRUMP - BEWARE of EATING or DRINKING anything offered
to you at the DEBATES!!!
Bring your own refreshments AND WATCH THEM CLOSELY!!!
Yes, and they all ‘mistakenly’ heard Hillary say the same thing.
excellent analysis!
Bookmarked!
#26: That’s just wrong!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.