Hillary Clinton: We Cannot End Terrorism Without Gun Control

Breitbart ^ | 23 Sep 2016 | AWR Hawkins

[ez]

Illary was using her “trucker” voice when she made this speech.

[TADSLOS]

It tells me one of two things is manifest: Either the system is so rigged that she can say anything and still be elected, or, the population is so diluted that gun control is a winning political strategy

Both.

[Lazamataz]

Well that just spoiled my day.

[Dick Bachert]

Because Trump’s KICKING YOUR “YUGE” ASS??? This is not rocket surgery!

[TADSLOS]

Reality bites my FRiend. Let’s just hope and pray Trump is elected. Keep your powder dry.

[Lazamataz]

We are so screwed.

[papertyger]

“Guns” are the Democrat’s “illegal immigration.”

We keep telling them what we want, and they studiously offer solutions we both know won’t accomplish what we’re asking for.

Then they act like there’s something wrong with us for not giving them our vote.....

[TADSLOS]

We have several die hard Clinton supporters in our retiree neighborhood. It really is breathtaking listening to an aging liberal try to explain why Clinton is eminently qualified to be President. I really don’t know whether to laugh in their face or just shake my head in disgust.

[hal ogen]

Laugh in their face.

[papertyger]

2ND amendment all that stands between us and total slavery

In the past, I'd have considered such a statement nothing but goofy hysterics. But when you consider the entire Washington hierarchy, with the willing assistance of the press, has spent literally YEARS publicly trying to convince us "immigration reform" is what we're screaming for when we've been clearly telling them to close the GD border...there's not much I'd put past them.

[from occupied ga]

She knows. She has no interest in citizen safety. After all her armed guards will protect her at your expense. Her push for total civilian disarmament (otherwise known as "common sense" gun laws) is for the purpose of inflicting a totalitarian police state on the USA that would make the DDR look like America in the 1790s.

You can't spend other peoples' life savings if the have a chance to defend their property. You can't get your precious black lives matter thugs to intimidate people if there's a chance they'll get shot. Likewise the precious JBTs might not make it home from rounding up gun owners if citizens can defend themselves.

[smokingfrog]

Well, I'm just a simple man, but I think she's wrong.

[Mr. Mojo]

Backwards, a usual.

We cannot STOP terrorism without the right to keep and bear arms.

[Rapscallion]

Doesn't stripping yourself of defensive weapons make you more vulnerable to terrorism?

Seems like we would be laying down our defenses in the face of a murderous enemy. Only a fool would propose that! (or the enemy himself/herself)