Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton Aide Cheryl Mills Got Partial Immunity in Email Investigation
nbcnews.com ^ | 9/23/2016 | Halimah Abdullah

Posted on 09/23/2016 2:01:23 PM PDT by rktman

The Justice Department has granted Cheryl Mills, a former chief of staff for Hillary Clinton, a limited immunity deal in the FBI's investigation into the use of the former secretary of state's private email server, the chairman of the House Oversight Committee said on Friday.

Chafffetz told the Associated Press that Mills allowed the FBI to access her laptop in the agency's now-closed investigation into Clinton's use of the private email server on the condition that findings couldn't be used against her. Two other staffers, John Bentel, then-director of the State Department's Office of Information Resources Management, and Clinton aide Heather Samuelson were also offered limited immunity deals.

(Excerpt) Read more at nbcnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: benghazi; bentel; blackivy; cheats; cherylmills; clintonrico; comeyrico; fbirico; getouttajailfreecard; heathersamuelson; hsbcrico; immunity; johnbentel; liars; limitedimmunity; lynchrico; petercomeyrico; samuelson; symbionpower; treason; treasonrico
In a report by 'Halimah Abdullah'. LOL! Of course she gets a pass. Is isis/isil/is/daesh also granting her immunity? Man this circus is getting YUGE!
1 posted on 09/23/2016 2:01:23 PM PDT by rktman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
By Robert Gehl, Federalist Papers
Cheryl Mills doesn’t know either (189 times)

She doesn’t recall, she doesn’t recollect. She’s not sure. She just doesn’t know. Hillary Clinton’s counsel and chief of staff doesn’t know a lot of things. She can’t remember testimony she gave. She isn’t sure if she spoke to anyone – she doesn’t remember Hillary’s email address, she doesn’t even know who might know anything. During seven hours of testimony before Judicial Watch, Cheryl Mills said “I don’t know” or some variation of ignorance at least 189 times.

Mills is clearly adept at finding ways to proclaim her ignorance. She was Bill Clinton’s counsel during the impeachment proceedings in the 1990s and has been a close advisor for both Bill and Hillary Clinton for decades.

Breitbart compiled a list of the near-200 times Mills declared how little she knows.

READ HERE http://thefederalistpapers.org/us/what-cheryl-mills-doesnt-know-could-last-seven-hours-wait-it-does

2 posted on 09/23/2016 2:07:38 PM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

So Cheryl Mills got immunity. That’s just a piece of trivia, a curiosity. The key phrase in this article: “the agency’s now-closed investigation”.

Case closed. No indictments. No nothing.


3 posted on 09/23/2016 2:08:00 PM PDT by Leaning Right (Why am I holding this lantern? I am looking for the next Reagan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Print up some more “Get of jail free” cards.


4 posted on 09/23/2016 2:08:03 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Sounds like Cheryl is running the FBI SHOW!!! SHE TELLS the FBI, I’ll give you the computer but you can’t hold anything against me??? OMG!! Mills is inside the RING on ALL these scandals.....she is just as dirty as the Clintons.


5 posted on 09/23/2016 2:08:34 PM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The protected muzzie class......


6 posted on 09/23/2016 2:09:18 PM PDT by Doogle (( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

And where lies the truth? There is no objective truth any more. I call it digital anarchy.


7 posted on 09/23/2016 2:11:33 PM PDT by refermech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
Meet the mastermind behind Clinton’s massive email coverup
New York Post ^ | September 4, 2016 | Paul Sperry / FR Posted by bushwon

EXCERPT--Newly released FBI documents detailing theinvest igation of Hillary’s State dept emails reveal the aide who would likely follow her into the White House as chief counsel was central to a cover-up of evidence sought by investigators.

Yet despite signs, Clinton’s former chief of staff Cheryl Mills obstructed efforts by investigators to obtain Clinton’s emails, the FBI invited Mills to attend Hillary’s interview at FBI headquarters as one of her lawyers.

“It’s absolutely outrageous,” J/W President Tom Fitton said. “The FBI saw massive document destruction and clear intent to withhold material evidence,” he added, “and they just ignored that obstruction, and even let her sit in on the interview.”

The smoking gun is on page 16 of the FBI’s 47-page report. It details how Mills ultimately made the determinations about which emails should be preserved before she and Clinton decided to delete the rest as “personal.” Clinton conducted both government and personal business using a personal email account — clintonemail.com — tied to an unsecured server set up in the basement of her New York home.

The FBI makes clear the procedure Mills used to sort out the emails was suspicious. Mills was the one who ordered the server host to move the emails from the server to a laptop where she could screen them. She told investigators she could “not recall” if emails with non-gov addresses were included in the transfer. It’s unlikely they were, because an aide who helped her search told the FBI she only screened for emails sent to or from Clinton with .gov and .mil — not .com — addresses.--SNIP-- (Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...

8 posted on 09/23/2016 2:12:56 PM PDT by Liz (SAFE PLACE? liberal's mind. Nothing's there. Nothing penetrates it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Leaning Right

Rigged...............


9 posted on 09/23/2016 2:16:09 PM PDT by wardamneagle (C)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: refermech

There is a lot of digital anarchy in general, but in this particular case, there’s plenty of evidence that Hillary broke the law, aided and abetted by her assistants.

Maybe the anarchy here is the cognitive dissonance between the expectation that law enforcement authorities will do their job, side-by-side with their blatant facilitating of law-breaking.


10 posted on 09/23/2016 2:22:36 PM PDT by MUDDOG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MUDDOG

Immunity from this (In)justice department in this instance is so that she can’t be prosecuted for her crimes once these anti-Free-America, America-hating bums are thrown from office. What a pathetic joke.


11 posted on 09/23/2016 2:24:26 PM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rktman

The FBI is being so bogus and making up reasons to give all of hillary’s staff immunity.

They NEVER had to trade immunity in exchange for looking into her computer. No one else in USA ever gets that deal.!

A search warrant is all they needed, and if she refused, it would have been instant jail time for her.


12 posted on 09/23/2016 2:58:08 PM PDT by Future Useless Eater (Clinton Foundation - Trading "Regime Change" and Uranium for donations since 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Prosecutors are the most morally bankrupt and ethically corrupt people on the planet.

This Trick is used frequently to BURY INCRIMINATING EVIDENCE, so is the Grand Jury. They take bits and pieces, not enough to sustain an Indictment, to a Grand Jury then it remains SECRET because it is Grand Jury Testimony without an Indictment.

The same is done with Immunity Deals, Bits and Pieces are testified to and BURIED when NO CHARGES are FILED.

REAL SCUMBAGS.


13 posted on 09/23/2016 3:33:46 PM PDT by eyeamok (destruction of government records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

I read on another thread that Comey decided not to indict Hillary in the Whitewater deal, so the grand jury evidence on her is still secret. I’m sure the lovely Cheryl Mills was in on that deal as well.


14 posted on 09/23/2016 4:59:32 PM PDT by JohnnyP (A minuscule percent of donations are distributed as aid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rktman

Former Secretary of State’s Top IT Official Pleads 5th Amendment More Than 90 Times
Cybercast News Service ^ | October 28, 2016 | 12:41 PM EDT
| Michael W. Chapman
Posted by Olog-hai
The former top IT official to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, pleaded the 5th Amendment against self-incrimination — 90 times — in a federal court-ordered deposition on Oct. 24.
John Bentel, the former Director of Information Resource Management of the Executive Secretariat, the office that handles information technology for the Office of the Secretary of State, was ordered by U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan to answer questions under oath to the lawyers at the government watchdog group Judicial Watch.
In his Aug. 19 order, Judge Sullivan wrote, “The Court is persuaded that Mr. Bentel should be deposed because the record in this case appears to contradict his sworn testimony before the [House Select] Benghazi Committee…. Specifically, Mr. Bentel testified that he was not aware that Secretary Clinton’s email account was housed on a private server until media reports in 2015…. However, several emails indicate Mr. Bentel knew about the private server as early as 2009.” …
(Excerpt) Read more at cnsnews.com ...


15 posted on 12/09/2018 9:52:45 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa
👹. Just catching up? This is from 2+ years ago and I forgot all about it. 😹👍🏼🍿🍻
16 posted on 12/09/2018 10:03:02 PM PST by rktman ( #My2nd! Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson