Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Donald Trump Says He'd Use Stop And Frisk To End Violence In Black Communities.
Chris Snyder Fox ^ | September 21, 2016

Posted on 09/21/2016 2:18:51 PM PDT by Pinkbell

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: Pinkbell

Stop and frisk is an unreasonable practice. Put yourself in my shoes. I carry a handgun frequently. On rare occasions, I even conceal it. If I walk down a street in my town and the police ask if they can frisk me because they noticed a bulge under my shirt, the response will be some variation of NO. Absent some level of probable cause, they have no right to search me, although they could (arguably) do a Terry frisk.

Why should I or anyone else who is merely walking down the street have to deal with that BS?

The crime problem has to with scum. Usually known scum who have all sorts of prior convictions. Take those scum off the street and the problem goes away. Another alternative is to arm the living daylights out of the populace and let them work the criminality problems as tradition dictates.

Stop and frisk may pay some dividends, but it fuels a “papers please” mentality that has no place in a free society.


21 posted on 09/21/2016 4:30:44 PM PDT by RKBA Democrat (Make phone calls. Knock on doors. Write letters. Or wake to a nightmare in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: digger48
Yes, quite Constitutional, having survived several challenges by the SCOTUS.

So is same-sex marriage, if that is your criteria for constitutionality.

22 posted on 09/21/2016 5:46:36 PM PDT by Ken H (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell
How long before your grandma in a wheelchair or your young daughter is stopped and frisked - you know, to make sure there is no racial profiling?

Anyone remember TSA?

23 posted on 09/21/2016 5:50:09 PM PDT by Ken H (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

It works.


24 posted on 09/21/2016 6:04:39 PM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

Lets stick with “Reasonable and articulable suspicion.”

We have case law that is well established in these matters in Terry vs. Ohio.

However, there are places and times that need a strong and assertive police presence to suppress crime.


25 posted on 09/21/2016 6:12:36 PM PDT by Molon Labbie (Hillary- Time To Change the Bag...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pinkbell

I’m actually a little surprised at the number of people here supporting stop-and-frisk. Regardless of the effect it may have had, it’s an extremely slippery slope.

If someone is seen throwing gang signs, acting suspiciously, that’s one thing. But to just stop someone and frisk them...in the hope that something is found...that’s a problem.

What else will then become acceptable, and if you think it is, then ask yourself this, “how many laws are repealed versus laws created every year?”


26 posted on 09/22/2016 6:02:30 AM PDT by voicereason (The RNC is like the "One-night stand" you wish you could forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson