Posted on 09/19/2016 10:12:17 AM PDT by TigerClaws
On a trip to New York City, London’s Muslim Mayor Sadiq Khan has said terror attacks are “part and parcel” of urban life, just hours after an Islamic terrorist bombed the city.
Mr. Khan also seized the opportunity to launch an explicit attack on the Brexit vote and rise of Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. He compared to two movements, claiming they are both driven by “scapegoating”.
“All these problems will not be solved by voting to leave the EU or voting for – I don’t want to name the candidate – a president of the USA,” he said.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Yes and recall the SOROS e-mail hack regarding “normalizing” refugee invasions into the west. WHAT A TOTAL INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL SYNDICATE!!!
The NY Mets let this SOB throw out the first pitch?
Yep, got your drift, and agree 100%!!!
If your goal is to reduce liberty, terrorism helps you to achieve that goal.
C210N wrote: "Does that mean that this Moslem mayor wants Hillary???? from the link: “I hope the best candidate wins – I’m sure she will”
And this is why we have to throw out these Muslim cockroaches from America..EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM..they are ZERO value to us here, all they do is come here, refuse to assimilate, and then kill us
by ‘she’ he means Huma
Train loads, bus loads and boat loads of Muslims, socialists and Marxists all being shipped in by air, sea and land makes the words of this London mayor correct and absolutely true.
These anti-American/anti-Western foreign fighters are taking over, and as Ashcroft just said on Cavuto, that our law enforcement is targeted is tragic.
We are at war at home, we’re fundamentally transformed, and Obama has succeeded.
Uh, no.
No thinking person will tolerate such, not when there are a lot of rocks that haven’t been turned over in looking for a solution. Like shutting the gates - at least for a while, if not pretty much forever. Like going after those who are already here who incite violence of various types. Like seizing funds from so-called “charities” that are, in reality, front organizations for terrorists.
Try that stuff first - REALLY try it, don’t just give it lip service for a couple of months and then say it failed - and THEN we can discuss learning how to live with this.
But, of course, this guy is a Moslem himself - OF COURSE he wants us to get used to it. Eff him!
He misspoke. I fixed it for him.
Mr Hahn, people who are, for one reason or another, not present, CAN’T terrorize anyone...
I hope the Mets lose every game they play the rest of the season and next season, too. ‘eff ‘em.
They not only allow this muzzie vermin to throw out the first pitch, they had him wearing a Mets uniform when he threw it!
An insult to all those who lost family on September 11, 2001.
They want us to just get used to globalism, mediocrity and terrorism. Some already have. However there are still some willig to fight for freedom.
Yes, because his (and 0bama’s) pals are going to keep doing it until we take strong measures.
Yep. bttt
Context is everything and those who say that we must get used to terrorism must be challenged to provide the context that provides the foundation for those views.
If the person means, “I think we’re stuck with terrorism even if we remain hyper-vigilant, stop immigration and deal harshly with proven collaborators,” that’s one thing. It is perhaps just a realistic assessment of what lies ahead whatever we try to do. But if they mean, “we’re going to support unlimited Muslim immigration and view terrorism as a natural consequence of slow-motion jihad so that fifty or a hundred years from now, your countries will be Muslim,” then that’s not on, and we need to move past the p.c. barrier to naming that reality and we need to get political leadership that will fight against that goal.
And if it’s just the French politician’s likely reasoning (this is too hard, I want a short work week) then boot that kind of idiot out of office also.
This Muslim mayor needs to get the message (and he won’t get it in Londonistan) that by and large, the populations of western countries don’t want any more of this and are ready to take whatever action is needed. Muslims who are not inclined to terrorism or cultural supremacy could do themselves a favor by getting off the fence and ending this ambiguous talk they like to use which is usually, “this doesn’t represent us and now we’re going to be victims of a backlash (which never really happens).”
We can live with a small minority of law-abiding people of any background but the people have the right to determine policies that will maintain cultural integrity, whether it’s on this issue or things like illegal immigration. These are our countries, we don’t have other places to go if things go wrong here, as our immigrants have had the good fortune to find. There is no North America or Europe that we can escape to, and we need to make it clear to elites that they don’t get to make these calls as if they had been elected and appointed to do so. That should be the main outcome of this presidential election, and while long overdue, it will be a good start on getting things right in the future.
Looks like London voters are just as stupid as liberal voters are in our country...
Let’s see, Londonistan’s liberal muslim mayor was against Brexit, is against Trump...
If he’s agin’ it, you best believe the correct thing is to be for it.
Yes, a globalist world, a world without borders. The unhindered freedom to cover the earth with bearded jihadi a$$holes.
How many politicians have you heard say this is un-constitutional? I have heard enough to know that Michelle Bachmann's plan to have incoming congressmen be enrolled in a constitution class didn't work.
There is no Constitutional right for anyone to immigrate here legal or otherwise.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.