Should we treat bank robbers the same way, shop lifters?
Just ignore them, as we have no obligation to society or the rule of law?
Or am I missing something in what you’re saying?
>
Should we treat bank robbers the same way, shop lifters?
Just ignore them, as we have no obligation to society or the rule of law?
Or am I missing something in what you’re saying?
>
Oh, I said *nothing* about ignoring the obvious.
Unfort., govt isn’t doing its job on multiple fronts (be that State > Fed); calling the cops\ICE+ just begets a revolving door effect (”Oh, you *promise* to come back to trail? Well, we’ll let you out until then.”). And, no We shouldn’t stop doing our due diligence.
That doesn’t mean govt gets (nor has the authority) to saddle BIZ with the attempt to clean up the mess for ‘em (while they wash their hands of the matter). And, if biz doesn’t do a ‘good enough job’, get fined out the wazoo.
You get govt out of the things it shallNOT be doing (welfare, sanctuary cities, etc.) and back to that which it SHALL (protecting Citizen Rights\border) and the illegal problem mostly disappears.
I’m all for a wall, if need be. But, it should be the FINAL task in a long laundry list, instead of burdening (or crushing) everyone else.