-nobody-saw-me-do-it(p)-you-can(a)t-prove-anything.jpg)
Posted on 09/08/2016 9:17:19 AM PDT by Rennes Templar
While Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump each generated headlines about comments made Wednesday night at a candidates’ forum, the buzz Thursday morning was more about a report claiming Clinton relied on a “micro” earbud as she fielded questions about national security — a claim her campaign vigorously denied.
The website True Pundit quoted unnamed New York police sources saying Clinton was wearing an “inductive earpiece” during the NBC forum hosted by Matt Lauer. The website described the unit as the kind of tech used by stage actors in need of prompting to recite forgotten lines.
Two senior campaign aides, though, told Fox News the report is absolutely not true.
The frenzied Internet speculation was a throwback to accusations George W. Bush faced after debates in the 2004 campaign that he was wearing a device that may or may not have been used to feed him answers – after photos appeared to show a bulge under the back of his suit jacket.
Bush officials rejected the speculation at the time, and Clinton officials now are doing the same.
In both cases, the candidates had to contend with suspicious-looking photographs. True Pundit published a zoomed-in image of Clinton’s left ear showing a shiny reflection purported to be a stealth communications device.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Really Mooook? So what was in her ear?
Having now seen video of the “earpiece” and not just the still photos it appears the “earpiece” is just some weird lighting thing. Nothing to see here.
The bigger news is that the lying criminal actually said the no Americans were killed in Libya.
Four Americans heroes slaughtered on 9/11/12 in Benghazi would disagree.
“Two senior campaign aides, though, told Fox News the report is absolutely not true.”
They continued: “What appears to be a “bud” is just a tumor.”
The military has transceivers which can be implanted in a tooth. She will just need to upgrade her technology.
Clinton camp denies claims she withheld any e-mails
Intercept the channel and introduce seizure inducing frequencies right when critical answers about lying are required.
My personal opinion is that Trump should avoid this and let the media buzz run its course. It’s pure speculation absent additional evidence and it most importantly brings attention to the general lack of trust for Hillary.
It is funny though. I remember when they said Bush was wearing one because of the bulge from his bullet-proof vest. What comes around goes around.........
Who are you going to believe? Hillary’s surrogates or your lying eyes?
“The bigger news is that the lying criminal actually said the no Americans were killed in Libya.”
They told her in the earpiece four Americans were killed but she misunderstood.
Better yet, just smuggle a dog whistle (the real kind) and you could make her to start barking at just the right moment.
Either that is an Earpiece, or some really shinny inner ears...which is even more disgusting.
When Mister Trump and Pence speak of a “rigged” election, this graphic and obvious example of cheating at a debate-like-forum provides palpable support.
One damned lie after another. I SAW it on LIVE TV, it is all over YouTube and Twitter, the Wikileaks email confirms she has one, Liars!!!
“a claim her campaign vigorously denied.”
She absolutely didn’t “rely” on it; she merely “benefited from it. Alternatively, it was categorically not a micro-earbud, it was a nano-earbud.
LOL
Lyin eyes ?!?! For reelz ?
My money was on them saying it was a hearing aid.
Sorry, if her campaign says she didn’t, she did.
Change the Charge to “any kind of ear device and watch them weasel again. Horseshit
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.