Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SpaceX’s Explosion Reverberates Across Space, Satellite and Telecom Industries
NY Times ^ | SEPT. 4, 2016 | Steve Lohr

Posted on 09/05/2016 1:34:08 PM PDT by Rockitz

The explosion of a SpaceX rocket last Thursday will have an impact across the space industry, far beyond the losses on the launchpad at Cape Canaveral.

An Israeli satellite operator’s deal to sell itself to a Chinese company is imperiled. Planned launches of communications satellites that support international mobile phone service and digital television are delayed and put in doubt. NASA’s cargo deliveries to the International Space Station will probably be disrupted.

All of them are customers of the Space Exploration Technologies Corporation, or SpaceX, whose rocket exploded in Florida. The private space launch company, led by the entrepreneur Elon Musk, has a generally solid safety record.

But last week’s setback and a failed launch last year, when its rocket carrying a NASA cargo fell apart in flight, are raising questions about SpaceX, a company that has risen rapidly by offering lower costs and promising accelerated launch schedules.

At this stage, there are more questions than answers. The key for SpaceX will be how quickly it can satisfy federal investigators, rebuild the damaged launchpad at Cape Canaveral and resume sending satellites into space. For commercial telecommunications customers, getting a satellite manufactured is time-consuming and expensive, taking two years or more and costing $200 million to $400 million each.

The launch itself is a high-risk step, but once in orbit the satellites are money spinners. The upfront investment is paid back in a few years, and they then generate hefty profits for the remainder of their useful life, which could be as much as a decade.

So once a satellite is ready to go, time on the ground — and delay — are financially painful. Among the commercial satellite operators lined up for SpaceX launches later this year are Iridium Communications, SES of Luxembourg, EchoStar and KT Corporation of South Korea.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News
KEYWORDS: elonmusk; explosion; rockets; satellites; spacex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
Elon thinks the insurance premiums were high before this? Wait until someone tries to buy an insurance policy on an upcoming SpaceX launch. Two catastrophic/total loss failures in 29 attempts. Sorry, but that ain't gonna cut it. Elon has NEVER understood risk. If his launch costs are lower, but the insurance premiums for a SpaceX launch make the net cost for his customer higher, guess where his customer is going to go? His US government customer will NOT accept this. When you are launching a $2 billion dollar payload and you're self-insured, this kinda crap is unacceptable. If they can get a reliable ULA ride on an Atlas V or Delta IV or Vulcan for a few million more, it is more than worth it. His only chance in this business was to suck up all of the business with below-cost launches and attempt to bankrupt ULA. He may yet be successful, but at what cost to his customers?
1 posted on 09/05/2016 1:34:08 PM PDT by Rockitz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

His customers can get insurance for their satellites on their own.

Musk will have to offer launch discounts to offset his customer’s increased premiums.


2 posted on 09/05/2016 1:38:09 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steely Tom

Hence, my use of the term “net cost.”


3 posted on 09/05/2016 1:41:06 PM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

We need these new space companies to get us back into space.

NASA has no interest in human space exploration. If we want humans back in space, these little start-ups are the only game in town.

It would be more productive to address what can facilitate that, than focusing on what will end it.


4 posted on 09/05/2016 1:42:22 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (He wins & we do, our nation does, the world does. It's morning in America again. You are living it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

Ah yes. Sorry.


5 posted on 09/05/2016 1:42:41 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Vote GOP: A Slower Handbasket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
“cargo fell apart in flight”
Don't cha just love good technical writing??s/


6 posted on 09/05/2016 1:44:40 PM PDT by Robe (A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
Can someone please explain to me why we can't just build the rockets from the 1960s that worked just fine to send men to the moon? Or put satellites on ICBMs for launch?
7 posted on 09/05/2016 1:54:29 PM PDT by JerryBlackwell (some animals are more equal than others)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

His only chance in this business was to suck up all of the business with below-cost launches and attempt to bankrupt ULA.

...

Is it really below cost?


8 posted on 09/05/2016 2:04:25 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
A friend of mine interviewed for a job a SpaceX.

During the interview process he discovered that the BOM for the rocket was being stored in an Excel spreadsheet.

When he suggested that this might not be the best way to manage the parts, the interview was ended.

9 posted on 09/05/2016 2:09:16 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

The government doesn’t care—and Musk is well-connected.


10 posted on 09/05/2016 2:18:18 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

We do not need humans in space.


11 posted on 09/05/2016 2:19:03 PM PDT by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
During the interview process he discovered that the BOM for the rocket was being stored in an Excel spreadsheet.

What is a BOM?

These people are way over their heads. More explosions to come.

12 posted on 09/05/2016 2:24:14 PM PDT by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
Maybe they could name the whole place "Cape Chappaquiddick" since the, ahem, Kennedy Space Flight Center is there.

...or is it named after JFK?

13 posted on 09/05/2016 2:25:14 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz

The rocket explosion, pending lawsuits and Tesla’s funding crisis all occuring at once may sunk Elon.


14 posted on 09/05/2016 2:27:10 PM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moonman62

That’s pure conjecture on my part, but we’ll see. Certainly rebuilding a launch pad is going to increase his costs going forward. I strongly suspect that below-cost pricing is the primary reason he hasn’t gone public yet.


15 posted on 09/05/2016 2:28:51 PM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear

That sounds about par for the course.


16 posted on 09/05/2016 2:30:15 PM PDT by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Bill Of Materials. It is the root “build list”, a list of all parts needed.


17 posted on 09/05/2016 2:31:54 PM PDT by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

I was under the impression that NASA does not set its own agenda. I think eight years of Trump will have NASA going places again. It’s time to go back to the moon. Young Americans need to see it happen in their own lifetimes, and it would hurt if the rest of the world could also get the message.


18 posted on 09/05/2016 2:32:12 PM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle

Humans in space may be the only place where there is peace in the future.

Take a look a this old world, and you soon realize that our exiting into space will happen for the same reason Europeans left Europe for the New World.

We do need humans in space.


19 posted on 09/05/2016 2:33:05 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (He wins & we do, our nation does, the world does. It's morning in America again. You are living it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: plain talk
BOM = Bill of Materials, i.e. the complete parts list for building the rocket.

It can be used to estimate costs, weight, scheduling, etc.

My friend was most interested in how they kept track of the overall weight of the rocket so they knew how much lift they would need to get it airborne.

They didn't seem quite as concerned as my friend.

20 posted on 09/05/2016 2:36:35 PM PDT by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson