Posted on 09/03/2016 7:16:13 AM PDT by drewh
Ahh the old lessor of two evils defense. Cool.
One of them came back down after a meeting, and the makeup on her nose and chin was gone.
How on Earth could something like that happen in a meeting between a man and a woman in a private office? I just don’t have a clue about such a thing but then I guess I ain’t too smart.
I disagree on both points.
Fox News will never be a propaganda outlet for Trump in the same way, say, the Clinton News Network works for Hillary.
But it is overwhelmingly Trump-friendly.
And I don't think he needs more than that.
So, you are a master-troll?
Just because you keep saying that does not make it true. I didn't see one friendly comment about Trump today on FNC, but I saw plenty of digs on Trump, even Ben Carson was asked if he was dumb.
This would make Fox no different than CNN, MSNBC, CBS...
This is FREEREPUBLIC...NOT STORMFRONT!
The vast majority of people you named are NOT "Jews" at all; they are stinking LIBERALS and THAT and THAT ALONE is their religion. They are SECULAR JEWS, who don't practice the fiath of their ancestors.
And your anti-Semetic screeds are not only disgusting, but untrue, akin to blood libel and you should run away and join ISIS or HAMMAS, since you have more in common with THEM, than you do with the beliefs that this site stands for.
“”Never watch the Wallace, Kelly and Baier garbage and they spin everything.””
NEVER? So your opinions are based on what?
For years I’ve heard people say, “I can’t stand Rush Limbaugh.”
Question: “Have you ever listened to him?”
Answer: “NO!”
Good answer Windy, I was going there until I saw your post.
Apparently we’ve got a few Rip Van Winkles here. Some folks seem to have slept straight through the primary.
*
Is there not something odd that Murdoch and Soros, both from other ends of the planet, are so influential in choosing who can/should run for POTUS?
Leni
Obviously must be two Fox News channels.
The one I watch is totally Trump-friendly, aside from some "Fair & Balanced" commentators.
In this particular example, I'd call asking Dr. Carson about Trump's IQ (even if that really happened!) is a total softball, since nobody is better qualified to speak of Trump's high IQ than a recognized genius brain surgeon.
Seriously, what the h*ll is your real problem, FRiend?
Lakeshark: "Good answer Windy, I was going there until I saw your post."
Sorry, FRiends, but Cruz won eleven deeply red-state primaries from Texas, Idaho & Alaska to Maine, based on the idea that he was the real, genuine conservative in the race.
In November those ten states will almost certainly vote for Trump over Hillary because Trump is the most conservative candidate left in the race.
So your ideas, that "lyin' Ted" is a fraud, were not generally accepted by many red-state conservatives at the time, and certainly does not need to be re-litigated now.
Trump is our man, for God's sake, so it's time for you people to get over Ted Cruz.
I think it’s more likely that Murdoch is afraid that Trump might be elected, so he is trying to make nice in an effort to stay off Trump’s #!*% list.
I once believed that too. When I originally changed from preferring Cruz to preferring Trump it was because I thought Trump was the better candidate for our time, not because I was upset at Cruz.
Then I saw him shed his principles, starting in Chicago when he ran to the cameras and blamed Trump for the violence perpetrated by the left. I watched as he curried favor with the very people he claimed to oppose, those who had worked against him, shedding skin after skin in order to gain some mythical edge he would never have.
Last, and most important, IF he were a genuine conservative, he would NOT have pulled his pouty, destructive, disunification stunt at the convention. Anyone who would do that thinks it's about himself, if he cared a whit for his "conservative principles" he would have unified and gone all in to give a beat down to the person and party that will destroy anything conservative if they win.
Frankly, I think he made a back deal with the Clinton/Soros machine, they fed his ego concerning his greatness, and they've promised him lots of crumbs in their kingdom.
He's become a sick shadow of a conservative, and has simply ruined his own career. Screw him and his pettiness, he's a fraud.
No, I posted to defend Fox News against ridiculous charges that it is somehow "anti-Trump".
It's not.
In the course of which I mentioned in passing that I had voted for Cruz as the most genuinely conservative candidate.
Well, that passing mention attracted a swarm of hornets the likes of which I've seldom seen.
Suddenly it's not just that "Lyin' Ted" is a fraud, but also that Trump himself is the most conservative candidate ever.
Well, I can't and won't defend Cruz for his recent behavior, especially refusing a full-throated endorsement of Trump, but the fact remains, as I pointed out above that Cruz won 11 primaries in solid-red states, based on the idea that he was the most conservative candidate with a chance to win.
Where Trump was strongest is precisely those states (such as my own Pennsylvania) which seldom, if ever, vote for Republican presidential candidates.
That alone should tell you something.
Bottom line: Trump will almost certainly carry in the general those 11 states which Cruz won in the primaries.
Whether Trump can carry in the general many states Trump won in primaries is yet to be determined.
I hope so, and a few pollsters (i.e., Patrick Caddell) are saying this will be a game-changing election.
I hope he's right, but most of the polls still show Hillary in more-or-less a cake-walk.
Further, I can't forget in 2012 a well known former Democrat who kept telling us the polls were wrong and Romney would win.
We'll see...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.