Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Failed] Colorado Anti-Fracking Ballot Measure Has ‘Potentially Forged’ Signatures
BOE Report ^ | August 29, 201611:50 AM | Michael Bastasch

Posted on 08/29/2016 12:51:05 PM PDT by snarkpup

Colorado officials identified “several potentially forged signature lines” on a failed ballot anti-fracking ballot measure pushed by environmental activists to restrict drilling inside state lines.

Officials said “No. 78,” a measure calling for a 2,500-foot setback on hydraulic fracturing, may have had forged signatures, and Colorado State Department officials “referred the questionable section to the Attorney General’s office for investigation.”

Secretary of State Wayne Williams announced Monday that “two proposed ballot measures aimed at adding more limitations on oil and natural gas drilling in Colorado failed to make the November ballot because supporters didn’t collect enough valid voter signatures.”

Both those ballot measures were pushed by environmentalists seeking a de facto ban on fracking — a process that involved pumping water, sand and some chemicals deep underground to unlock previously untapped oil and natural gas deposits.

(Excerpt) Read more at boereport.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: energy; environmentalism; fossilfuels
But enviros never give up:

Ruling On Initiatives 75 and 78 Is Not The Final Say

The way signature gathering works in Colorado is that the Secretary of State aggressively kicks out any signature that is at all questionable; and then the court reinstates some of them.

1 posted on 08/29/2016 12:51:05 PM PDT by snarkpup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: snarkpup

But... but... but... you mean it’s not “settled law”?


2 posted on 08/29/2016 1:02:07 PM PDT by Fido969 (Maybe I';ve been posting for the last 10 years, and rather than spew cr@p you could look up my posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarkpup

Those numbers say well over 20%, maybe 25%, of the signatures were hinky. That’s about what some of us saw individually back when True The Vote did their crowdsourcing of signature checking for one of the Wisconsin anti-Walker votes.

And that was just obvious signature “irregularities”, shall we say — obvious mismatches between the penmanship of the signature and the writing of the address, many signatures looking as they had been written in the same hand, scrawls that were little more than a simple curve, etc. Checking for bogus addresses, people who were not even registered, etc., would have to have been down at HQ.


3 posted on 08/29/2016 2:04:14 PM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarkpup
GASP!! GULP!! You mean ... you mean ... liberals might lie and cheat?
4 posted on 08/29/2016 3:15:22 PM PDT by tom h
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: george76

ping


5 posted on 08/30/2016 6:44:47 AM PDT by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; MileHi; dynachrome; Balata; bboop; Benito Cereno; BulletBobCo; Carley; ColoCowgirl; ...

Colorado Ping ( Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)

and :

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3463926/posts?page=14#14


6 posted on 08/30/2016 6:58:38 AM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson