US: CLINTON CALENDARS WON'T BE RELEASED UNTIL AFTER ELECTION

ASSOCIATED PRESS ^ | August26, 2016 7:32 PM | BY TED BRIDIS

[Swordmaker]

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Seven months after a federal judge ordered the State Department to begin releasing monthly batches of the detailed daily schedules showing meetings by Hillary Clinton during her time as secretary of state, the government told The Associated Press it won't finish the job before Election Day.

The department has so far released about half of the schedules. Its lawyers said in a phone conference with the AP's lawyers that the department now expects to release the last of the detailed schedules around Dec. 30, weeks before the next president is inaugurated.

The AP's lawyers late Friday formally asked the State Department to hasten that effort so that the department could provide all Clinton's minute-by-minute schedules by Oct. 15. The agency did not immediately respond.

[Fungi]

That rag will print anything to sell a copy, the more outrageous, the better.

[Whenifhow]

On your first point about Huma and calendar,

There have been several threads posted stating in the title there were things missing on the calendars.
Scroll Dow on this list.
Search > title > calendar

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/search?m=all;o=time;q=quick;s=Calendar

At the end of this video, Rich Grinnell says that Clinton is in control of her calendar, not the state dept.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=Dw7GBTFRzKk

[gubamyster]

Thanks for the link & additional info. That’s what I was referring to - Huma put the schedules in the burn bags to illegally destroy them.

[blackdog]

Inch by inch. Step by step, Drip by drip. The Romanian solution is coming. What a vile piece of garbage that woman and her army of $hit stirring grubbers are!

[Swordmaker]

Now what do they have to hide?

Correlations. . . between the dates of donations to the Clinton Foundation and when the donors finally got access to Hillary to talk about their agendas and then when Hillary changed long standing US Policies that benefited those donors.

Clinton Cash, is an hour and a half long movie that shows many of the connections that can already be made without access to those calendars. Can you imagine what could be connected WITH access to them?

Here is a map to some of those connections:

SOURCE—RadarOnLine

WARNING! I had sent this PDF to around 30 people on my Conservatives email list. . . and I went to find the link where it came from so I could post it here, and as I opened the sent email I watched it, it was instantly PULLED from my SENT EMAIL files! It disappeared from every one of my devices as each one attempted to access that email from the SERVICE PROVIDER'S FOLDER! FRiends, this is enemy action!

[1_Rain_Drop]

Are you using hillary’s server?

[BigEdLB]

If Wikileaks & Assamge is worth their salt, that schedule will be on the top of the release.

[Chad N. Freud]

Not surprising in the least. What happened to you can (or will) happen to all of us.

Hillary Campaign Issues CHILLING Threat to Conservative Websites… This Is SICK

http://conservativetribune.com/ ^ | 8/20/16 | Staff

Posted on ‎8‎/‎20‎/‎2016‎ ‎9‎:‎58‎:‎25‎ ‎PM by V K Lee

Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton’s campaign has issued a threat to a major conservative website that should have all conservatives — and anyone that believes in the First Amendment — very concerned.

The Daily Caller reported that Clinton’s campaign sent out a fundraising email with a serious threat to conservative news site Breitbart News. The email essentially said that the site has no “right to exist,” and threatened that if Clinton is elected, she will work to take down Breitbart, sites like it, and presumably their readers.

The email, which was sent Thursday and signed by deputy communications director Christina Reynolds, goes on to claim that the “regular conservative media” is fine, but that Breitbart is different.

“We’ve had a conservative media in this country for a while. I don’t always like what they have to say, but I respect their role and their right to exist,” Reynolds wrote.

The email goes on to malign Breitbart and references what likely sparked the email, Breitbart News Executive Chairman, Stephen K. Bannon, being appointed as chief executive of GOP presidential nominee Donald Trump’s campaign:

“Breitbart is something different. They make Fox News look like a Democratic Party pamphlet. They’re a different breed altogether — not just conservative but radical, bigoted, anti-Muslim, anti-Semitic conspiracy peddlers who never have been and never should be anywhere near the levers of power in this country,” the email states.

Based apparently on Reynolds’ ill-educated assumptions about Breitbart and on her inability to deal with anyone that disagrees with her, Reynold’s goes on to threaten “these people,” referring presumably to Breitbart and by association those who read it:

“It goes without saying that we have to beat these people. But I want to beat them so decisively that their kind never rises again.”

-- http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3461435/posts

[eeriegeno]

Some people are stuck on stupid or ignorant sadly. There are millions out there who will vote for this woman , and yet the media will keep telling them lies.

Ms Clinton has a (D) after her name. The (D)'s provide and extend welfare, SNAP, HEAP, WIC, HUD housing, etc. to a hundred million people, more or less. Those people will not bite the hand that feeds them. They will vote for the (D), even if that (D) has horns. 50+% of the Catholics, who are supposedly opposed to abortion, will vote for the (D), who is pro abortion, because they are both socialists. The majority of the blacks will vote for the (D) even though the (D)'s fought against racial equality for over a hundred years. Yes, sadly, ignorant people will elect a (D) this election; ignorant people who get their news from Saturday Night Live and the alphabet networks....

[BigEdLB]

Here is what you need to do. Pull it up. Screen print. Copy to paint. Save as .png. Upload to a photo sharing program. Photobucket or Flickr. Then link it.

[odawg]

The witch can’t complain anymore about Trump not releasing his tax returns.

[teletech]

Has ANYONE seen this level of corruption in their lifetime? I certainly haven’t. The cover up continues!

[TnTnTn]

Why are we even bothering to have an election?

[trebb]

Maybe Trump’s folks should play a conjecture/guessing game and supply some possibilities and ask folks to pick what they think is most likely....

[Pearls Before Swine]

How hard can this be? Can’t Judicial Watch petition the judge for sanctions on this slow-rolling of evidence production?

[Tallguy]

Ahhhh, the old “slow roll” non-compliance/compliance.