Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton to be questioned under oath on origins of email server
Washington Examiner ^

Posted on 08/24/2016 10:05:03 AM PDT by bryan999

Hillary Clinton will soon face questions under oath about the reasons she set up and maintained a private email server during her four years as secretary of state.

Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, told the Washington Examiner that his group is preparing a set of written questions for Clinton as part of the Freedom of Information Act lawsuit that has already extracted hundreds of documents from the State Department.

Fitton said the questionnaire, which Clinton will be forced to complete within 30 days of receipt, will drill down on the Democratic nominee's shifting stories about why she relied on an unauthorized email network.

Clinton once said she set up the server system for convenience, in order to carry just one device for both personal and work-related communications.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clinton; emails
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last
To: bryan999

Deleting the emails is a felony charge of obstruction of justice.


21 posted on 08/24/2016 10:29:10 AM PDT by stockpirate (BEST F'ING ELECTION EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

All she will be required to do, is to make truthful statements. They may have no relevance to the questions asked.


22 posted on 08/24/2016 10:32:52 AM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DJ Frisat
She will sign a deposition after it is word smithed by the battery of lawyers on the crime family payroll probably.
23 posted on 08/24/2016 10:46:38 AM PDT by Mouton (The insurrection laws maintain the status quo now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

First off Hillary won’t be answering anything. Her crooked lawyers will. And second- what do you do in this case when you don’t get actually get answers to your questions. When you get nothing but stonewalling.


24 posted on 08/24/2016 10:49:18 AM PDT by Revel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

Will they have to subpoena Condi and Colin to refute her testimony that she was following the advice of past Secretaries of State?


25 posted on 08/24/2016 10:51:13 AM PDT by shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert357
This is a CIVIL suit. She MUST answer the questions and may NOT plead the 5th as she is not under criminal indictment.

If she FAILS to answer she can be held in contempt of court. If she lies she can then be charged with perjury.

"Ceterum censeo Hillary esse delendam."

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)

LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

26 posted on 08/24/2016 11:06:47 AM PDT by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

Forget it folks she does not have to answer until after the election so what difference does it make


27 posted on 08/24/2016 11:18:18 AM PDT by ballplayer (hvexx NKK c bmytit II iyijjhihhiyyiyiyi it iyiiy II i hi jiihi ty yhiiyihiijhijjyjiyjiiijyuiiijihyii)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LydiaLong

Yup. She had the fbi not videotape her and had dveryone there sign nda’s. Unprecedented.

JW is great and I amgld they are doing this, but they are not going to do better than the fbi, considering what they made the fbi do.


28 posted on 08/24/2016 11:26:05 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: I want the USA back

I wonder if the diazepam guy will be there to tell her to keep talking, or tell her to stop talkig.


29 posted on 08/24/2016 11:27:07 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NEMDF

I had an apple with lunch today.

My daughters name is chelsea.

My pantsuit is from Womens Warehouse.

....

I answered all your questions.


30 posted on 08/24/2016 11:28:52 AM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: LonePalm

I loaned some stock to JW back before Larry left got audited for five years.


31 posted on 08/24/2016 11:35:04 AM PDT by Little Bill (o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bryan999; All

She lies under oath over and over -

they put Martha in jail for one ‘lie’ even tho’ they manufactured the lie by intimidation of a young man, making him change his testimony) Martha did 18 months - got beat up in jail - and then spent months under house arrest with an ankle ‘bracelet”!!!!!!!

She was, after all, a dangerous criminal, selling state secrets - oh wait....

With Madame C. traitorous doer of high crimes and misdemeanors - they just say she ‘misspoke’


32 posted on 08/24/2016 11:54:37 AM PDT by maine-iac7 (A Christian is as a Christian does - "By their works...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

Clinton; It came from the vast right wing conspiracy led by Colin Powell.


33 posted on 08/24/2016 11:55:35 AM PDT by minnesota_bound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CivilWarBrewing

Also doing the job the FBI apparently can’t/won’t do. I am still wondering why just having the private servers and conducting government business on them isn’t enough to get her in major trouble with the Feds.


34 posted on 08/24/2016 11:57:11 AM PDT by Cecily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

And God knows a Clinton never would lie under oath.


35 posted on 08/24/2016 11:58:22 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Exactly. Or she will repeatedly say she does not remember but that James Comey said she told the truth to the FBI.


36 posted on 08/24/2016 12:02:36 PM PDT by NEMDF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bryan999

Before or after the election?


37 posted on 08/24/2016 12:14:45 PM PDT by DonkeyBonker (The future does not belong to Hellary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

“It doesn’t matter, we all know she is above the law.”

Not only is she above the law; but also, all she will do is lie and no one will challenge her and she will skate once again.


38 posted on 08/24/2016 1:00:04 PM PDT by kagnew (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DJ Frisat

I’m sure it’s David “Mr. Evil Himself” Kendall (He’s been the Big clinton lawyer from Whitewater to the Lewinsky affair to the present Email Server drama) who gets the 30 days to answer actually. He’ll need all 30 days (And Nights)to compare all of her past replies to these present questions too. LOL!


39 posted on 08/24/2016 1:10:14 PM PDT by Pagey (HELL is The 2nd Term of a POTUS who is a MALICIOUS DIVIDER of humans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-39 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson