Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: enumerated

I think the poster was saying that the campaign - not Sarah Palin, personally - ignored the press and stopped her from battling back. Sarah could only respond as far as the campaign would allow her. And they hated her from the very beginning - those two evil losers, Steve Schmidt and Nicole Wallace.

Off point, Sarah was the most talented politician I’ve seen post Reagan. She had the media instincts of Princess Diana - a media genius. Palin also had a down-home quality that was massively appealing to not only the middle of the country but to this city girl!


76 posted on 08/22/2016 3:55:23 PM PDT by miss marmelstein (Richard the Third: With my own people alone I should like to drive away the Muslims)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: miss marmelstein

I guess I was not clear and there is some misunderstanding regarding what I meant by ignoring the press.

I guess there are two kinds of “ignoring”. The one I meant is when the media starts trolling about how Trump has to be more presidential, how his “tone” may have worked in the primary with uneducated white males, but now blah blah blah. This is concern trolling and is what I’m saying should be ignored.

I guess another kind of “ignoring” would be letting the leftist media push a narrative and not fighting back against it. That kind of ignoring is NOT what I meant.

Sorry everyone for being unclear.


79 posted on 08/22/2016 11:05:14 PM PDT by enumerated
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson