Posted on 08/18/2016 8:51:26 AM PDT by plain talk
Congress may have the FBI’s documents on the Hillary Clinton email investigation – but Republicans are complaining that the way the files were handed over means only a few lawmakers can actually see them.
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, says the bureau has “improperly” limited access to the files, by mixing in classified information with the rest of the material.
The result: a cache of documents that only some can see in their entirety.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Haul Comey’s sorry a$$ out and hang him on the Mall.
Can we get some WikiLeaks help on this?
“We can’t jail all the crooks in government...there would be no government left!”
If her emails had nothing in them as a risk to the state why did she delete 30,000 of them,
Some answers are so easy unless you don’t want the right answers see media.
Maybe it is because this is actually true:
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3460589/posts
But Comet said only a couple were classified!
Oh I am sooooo shocked
Screw that - the FBI isn’t in charge of Congress, it’s the opposite. They are surely allowed to see it regardless and disperse it, unless it’s classified. The FBI doesn’t tell Congress what to do.....
EHY THE HELL is it ONLY GRASSLEY????n They sould go en blanc to the mics and camers!!
If government employees think they are extensions of the Democrat Party, then let the Democrat Party pay them.
Why are we giving tax money to people who give their loyalty to the Democrat Party and not the people of the United States?
So Hillary didn’t send or receive any classified information, but the notes and materials from the investigation can only be viewed in a SCIF and must be heavily redacted to be viewed by our elected representatives.
I’m just not feeling the “We The People” anymore....
James Comey is a traitor to the people of the United States.
His name will go down in history next to Benedict Arnold.
Another poster boy for TERM LIMITS!!!!
Inside the FBI: agents’ outrage at Hillary email decision
by Jon Rappoport
July 13, 2016
—You’re an FBI agent. You sit and watch television night after night, as a Presidential candidate who should have been brought up on felony charges, and thereby disqualified and scuttled, moves through the land and makes promises about what she’ll do as the next leader of the nation. You sit and watch, deepening your grasp on how the system actually works—
How much blood is boiling among FBI agents?
Sharyl Attkisson, former CBS News investigative reporter, has the story:
“Many people at the FBI are outraged, but cannot speak out,” one insider told me,” Attkisson writes.
We’re talking about FBI Director James Comey’s recommendation that Hillary Clinton not be prosecuted in her email scandal. This, after thousands of hours of FBI work scouring the emails connected to Hillary’s illegal private server.
Here are several other comments FBI professionals made, off the record, to Attkisson, with my remarks in parentheses ():
“It appears to me they made a deal not to record [the key FBI-Hillary] interview.”
(This failure, as I wrote, means the interview is lost forever. No stenographic transcript was executed, either. FBI agents’ notes on the interview are useless. They can never be used against Hillary as ironclad evidence in a court of law.)
“Director Comey seems to have taken on responsibilities far beyond the FBI’s purview—he assumed the duties of the Agent, US Attorney and Grand Jury.”
(Indeed he did. He functioned as FBI Director, Grand Jury, Attorney General, and appellate judge. In this last role, he knowingly misinterpreted the Federal Penal Code, which clearly states that gross negligence in the handling of classified material is a crime, regardless of intent. Hillary was, at the very least, grossly negligent. FBI Director Comey acknowledged this.)
“It appears no Grand Jury was empaneled for this investigation. This is absurd, Grand Juries are used in nearly all criminal investigations.”
“Even in the most straightforward of cases, the time span between a target interview [of Hillary] and prosecution opinion [on whether to file charges] takes weeks, not days. If a good interview were conducted [with Clinton] on Saturday, there would have been leads or other new pieces of information to verify or investigate prior to any conclusion to the case.”
(In other words, the fix was already in.)...
Read at:
There were loads of FBI lovers here a few months ago, any left?
Depends on how much the FBI is corrupt.
If congress wants US secrets they can buy them from the Clinton foundation just like every body else.
They are not going to just give them away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.